The Effects of a Group-based Gaze Training Intervention for Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Group-based, Gaze Training Intervention for Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cheshire
-
Crewe, Cheshire, United Kingdom, CW1 5DU
- Manchester Metropolitan University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Prior diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder or suspected to have DCD
- Scores below the 5th percentile on the MABC-2 (Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2)
- Be of normal intelligence (assessed through parent/teacher feedback)
- No neurological disorder
- Normal of corrected-to-normal vision
Exclusion Criteria:
- Score over 5th Percentile on the MABC-2
- Suffers from a neurological disorder
- Below average intelligence
- Any visual impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Technical Training Group
15 children diagnosed with DCD
|
Children will watch an instructional video focused on movement related instructions regarding the throwing and catching task.
|
|
Experimental: Quiet Eye Training Group
15 children diagnosed with DCD
|
Children will watch the same video as the TT group but will also receive instructions designed to optimise their quiet eye durations.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Catching Success
Time Frame: From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
How many balls the participants catch out of 50 attempts
|
From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
|
Changes in the qualitative catching performance scale score
Time Frame: From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
The qualitative catching performance scale consisted of an 11-point scale whereby catch attempts were given a score between '0' (Makes no move towards the ball as it comes back) and '10' (The catch is made exclusively with the palms and fingers).
|
From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
|
Changes in Quiet Eye durations
Time Frame: From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
Changes in participants eye-movements
|
From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes 3D Movement Kinematics
Time Frame: From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
Changes in joint angles related to the throwing movement
|
From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
|
Changes in Muscular Activity (EMG)
Time Frame: From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
Changes in muscular activity related to the throwing task
|
From Baseline to after a 4 week training period, and after 6-week delayed retention test
|
|
Parental Perceptions of Motor Skill Improvements
Time Frame: End of the study (approximately 12 weeks after baseline testing)
|
Parent feedback will be gathered using a short answer questionnaire.
|
End of the study (approximately 12 weeks after baseline testing)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Omid Alizadehkhaiyat, PhD, Liverpool Hope University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Miles CA, Wood G, Vine SJ, Vickers JN, Wilson MR. Quiet eye training facilitates visuomotor coordination in children with developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 May;40:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
- Wood G, Miles CA, Coyles G, Alizadehkhaiyat O, Vine SJ, Vickers JN, Wilson MR. A randomized controlled trial of a group-based gaze training intervention for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171782. eCollection 2017.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15/NW/0279
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.