Exercise Prior to Oesophagectomy (ExPO)

November 8, 2016 updated by: University of East Anglia

A Pre-operative Personalised Exercise Programme to Improve Physical Fitness and Reduce Post-operative Cardiopulmonary Complications After Oesophagectomy in Patients With Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

The purpose of this feasibility study is to determine whether a structured exercise programme prior to oesophagectomy has: acceptable adherence, is safe, and improves physiological measures of physical fitness above standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The number of patients with oesophageal cancer is rising dramatically in the UK. Curative cancer surgery (oesophagectomy) is offered to around 40% of affected patients. However, oesophagectomy is a major operation with a high risk of complications. Around 1 in 3 patients will suffer such a complication after surgery, mostly due to heart or lung problems. Most complications are not due to the surgery itself, but related to the patient's physical fitness before their operation. Studies in other surgeries, but not oesophagectomy, have shown that complications may be reduced by improving a patient's physical fitness before their operation. The ExPO team has developed a pre-operative Personalised Exercise Programme (my-PEP), specifically for patients undergoing oesophagectomy. my-PEP has 4 main components: three are exercise modalities (aerobic exercise, breathing exercises and muscle strengthening); the fourth is where a participant's potential barriers to exercise are assessed and behavioural change techniques (BCTs) are suggested to improve exercise engagement in the trial. In total, 32 patients who are due to undergo oesophagectomy at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital will be recruited and then randomly divided into 2 arms of 16 each. One arm will receive my-PEP in the standard 3-4 months prior to surgery, the other will receive standard care advice to exercise at home. The research objectives are to obtain feasibility data on whether my-PEP is acceptable, adhered to and safe, and whether it improves patient fitness above standard care. Follow up will be 90 days after surgery to obtain a preliminary imprecise estimate of whether my-PEP reduces complications. If the ExPO trial shows promise in these areas, this will inform and justify a future large multi-centre trial to definitively answer whether my-PEP can reduce complications after oesophagectomy. If so, my-PEP could potentially change and improve the pre-operative management of oesophageal cancer patients across the NHS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Norfolk
      • Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom, NR4 7TJ
        • Recruiting
        • University of East Anglia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) who are scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent oesophagectomy.
  • Must have histological evidence of OAC
  • Must be capable of giving informed consent and complying with trial procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Patients with concomitant illness or disability that makes them unsuitable for an exercise programme, as determined by a clinician (e.g. severe musculoskeletal or neurological disease, unstable angina, severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled dysrhythmias and uncompensated heart failure).
  • WHO performance status 3 (capable of only limited self-care, confined to a bed or chair more that 50% of waking hours) or greater.
  • Grade 5 (too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when undressing) on MRC dyspnoea scale.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Control
Standard care
Behavioral: Home Exercise Programme (HEP)
Written advice on exercise at home
Experimental: Intervention
A pre-operative personalised exercise programme (my-PEP).
Behavioral: Pre-operative Exercise Programme (my-PEP)
A pre-operative personalised exercise programme (my-PEP) consisting of: 1) actions to promote exercise, using behavioural change techniques (BCTs), 2) home inspiratory muscle training (IMT), 3) a home exercise programme (HEP) - which is also current standard care, 4) a 4 week hospital-supervised aerobic and muscle strengthening programme (Hos-PEP) .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: 0 months
The number of participants recruited from all eligible patients
0 months
Drop-out rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of patients that drop-out from trial
12 months
Decline rate
Time Frame: 0 months
Number of patients that decline to participate in the trial
0 months
Change in physical activity levels
Time Frame: 0 and 4 months
Measured with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
0 and 4 months
Change in attitudes to exercise
Time Frame: 0 and 4 months
Measured with Determinates of Physical Activity Questionnaire (DPAQ)
0 and 4 months
Trial Adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Physical activity diary used to assess adherence
12 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of adverse events during the trial assessed using CTCAE
12 months
Change in physiological fitness
Time Frame: 0 and 4 months
Assessed with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test on a bicycle ergometer
0 and 4 months
Change in respiratory muscle strength
Time Frame: 0 and 4 months
Assessed with mean inspiratory pressure testing in cmH20
0 and 4 months
Post-operative cardiopulmonary complications
Time Frame: 90-days post surgery
Cardiopulmonary complication rates as per ECCG definition.
90-days post surgery
Post-operative non-cardiopulmonary complications
Time Frame: 90-days post surgery
Inpatient, 30-day and 90-day non-cardiopulmonary complication rates as per ECCG definition.
90-days post surgery
Post-operative length of stay
Time Frame: 90-days post surgery
Duration of post-operative stay in days
90-days post surgery
Post-operative mortality
Time Frame: 90-days post surgery
Number of post-operative deaths
90-days post surgery
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: 0, 4, 7 months
Assessed using QLQ C30 and OG25
0, 4, 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of East Anglia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 206608

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings