Pharmacokinetics of BPV Following Bilateral US-guided TAP Block for C-section

December 26, 2016 updated by: Ben marzouk Sofiene, University Tunis El Manar

Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine Following Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Cesarean Section

The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) is an effective method of postoperative pain management after cesarean section (C-section). Up to now, there are no data available about bupivacaine (BPV) plasma levels after TAP block in adults. In the current study, the investigators aimed to assess BPV pharmacokinetic parameters after ultrasound-guided TAP block using BPV in parturients undergoing C-section and to report its effects on corrected QT interval.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators led a prospective observational study in pregnant women undergoing elective C-section under spinal anesthesia (SA) using 10 mg of hyperbaric BPV. After surgery, they received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block with 50 mg of BPV in each side. Venous blood samples were collected immediately before and at 10, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 720 and 1440 minutes after both TAP blocks. The investigators used high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to measure BPV total plasma concentrations. Mean BPV area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from 0 to 24 hours according to the linear trapezoidal rule. Mean peak of total BPV plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach the peak (Tmax) were recorded. Electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings were also repeated at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours to investigate the effect of BPV on corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Data were computed using SPSS 20®. Quantitative data were expressed as means ± SD. Qualitative data were expressed as percentages.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

After obtaining approval by the institute ethics committee and having written informed consent signed on the day of surgery, 17 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II pregnant women aged between 20 and 40 years scheduled for elective C-section with Pfannenstiel incision, under SA, were enrolled in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

ASA physical status I-II pregnant women scheduled for elective C-section with Pfannenstiel incision under Spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status > II,
  • known allergy to local anesthetics,
  • body mass index (BMI) more than 40 kg/m²,
  • coagulation disorders,
  • neurologic or neuromuscular disease,
  • significant liver or renal dysfunction,
  • electrolyte disturbances,
  • heart arrhythmias,
  • corrected QT (QTc) interval> 0.47s
  • patients taking drugs that may prolong QT interval.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Total venous plasma concentration of BPV
Time Frame: Immediately before and at 10, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 720 and 1440 minutes after both TAP blocks.
Immediately before and at 10, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 720 and 1440 minutes after both TAP blocks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
corrected QT interval
Time Frame: at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after TAP blocks
at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after TAP blocks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Tunis El Manar

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 30, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 26, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UTEM BPV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings