MgSO4 as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine vs Neostigmine in TAP Block in Cesarean Section

March 28, 2026 updated by: Alfarouk Ayman Farouk Omar, Assiut University

Comparative Evaluation of Magnesium Sulphate Versus Neostigmine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block as Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Section

The aim of this study is to compare the duration of analgesia obtained by addition of Neostigmine versus MgSO4 as adjuvants to bupivacaine in TAP block in patients undergoing Cesarean Section and to evaluate postoperative analgesic requirements, side effects and level of patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most operations in the world. Effective postoperative analgesia after it is very important because it encourages breast feeding and facilitates early ambulation and recovery. Postoperative analgesia is too important to prevent unwanted side effects such as venous thromboembolism, respiratory complications and increased hospital stay.Post Caesarean discomfort and pain is expected; so, the analgesic regimen should assure safe and efficient sedation. Commonly, opioids and NSAIDs are used for post caesarean pain relief. While dose dependent respiratory depression is the most discomforting side effect, other insignificant side effects such as gastrointestinal upset, pruritus and urinary retention can be annoying during the first hours of puerperium. The transversus abdominus plane (TAP) block has been used for postoperative pain relief in different abdominal surgeries as part of the multimodal anesthetic approach.It creates satisfactory somatic anesthesia with no visceral blockade. Its widespread use in abdominal surgeries is due to its technical simplicity and trustworthy analgesia .This block implies administering local anesthetic between the internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle, which is marked by the lumbar Petit triangle. The primary drawback of single-shot regional blocks is their short duration of action when administered with local anesthetic alone. Several adjuvants, including opioids, alpha 2 agonists,Neostigmine, N-methylD-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, and other drugs, have been utilized to extend the duration of blocks . Opioids are by far the most often used adjuvants, but they accompany a host of unpleasant side effects, such as respiratory depression, drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting. In some studies, using alpha 2 agonists such as Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine has been related to drowsiness and bradycardia .

MgSO4 is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. It acts by non-competitive antagonism blocking the voltage-dependent ion channels.

The potential of neostigmine as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve block is through its action to increase acetylcholine at muscarinic junctions of peripheral nerves. 500 mcg neostigmine was used as adjuvant to local anesthetic in an axillary brachial plexus block leads to decreased pain and less use of analgesics in the first 24 hours postoperatively with no incidence of adverse effects

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asyut, Egypt
        • Women's Health Hospital, Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 19 to 40 years old
  • Singleton pregnencies with a gestational age of at least 37 weeks
  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical state I , II
  • patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery via Pfannenstiel incision with exteriorization of the uterus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal
  • Age < 19 or > 40 years
  • Height<150 cm, weight < 60 kg, body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m2.
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (Coagulopathy, increased intracranial pressure, or local skin infection).
  • Cardio-respiratory conditions
  • Convulsions
  • Inability to comprehend or participate in the pain scoring system.
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Known allergy to any drugs used in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group M "bupivacaine + normal saline + MgSO4"
will receive 25 ml volume on each side ( 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5 ml of normal saline containing 250 mg of MgSO4 )
.an intravenous (IV) access will be secured . Standard ASA monitoring will be instituted which include(SpO2), ECG and (NIBP) . At the end of surgery , a bilateral USG-guided TAP block will be carried out under strict aseptic precautions, and 20 mL of study solution was injected into each side. After draping the abdominal region between the 12th rib and anterior superior iliac crest with the umbilicus in the center, the external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle , and their fascia will be located beneath the skin and subcutaneous tissue using a linear high-frequency probe 6-13 Megahertz of the SonoSite Micromax machine. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be advanced using the in-plane technique at the anterior axillary line, and the precise position of the needle tip between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscle will be visualized. To expand the plane, 2 mL of normal saline will be administered.
25ml volume on each side (20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5ml of normal saline containing 250 mg of MgSO4) to keep the total volume the same in both group
Active Comparator: Group D "bupivacaine + normal saline + Neostigmine"
will receive 25 ml volume on each side ( 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5 ml of normal saline containing 500 mcg of Neostigmine
.an intravenous (IV) access will be secured . Standard ASA monitoring will be instituted which include(SpO2), ECG and (NIBP) . At the end of surgery , a bilateral USG-guided TAP block will be carried out under strict aseptic precautions, and 20 mL of study solution was injected into each side. After draping the abdominal region between the 12th rib and anterior superior iliac crest with the umbilicus in the center, the external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, transversus abdominis muscle , and their fascia will be located beneath the skin and subcutaneous tissue using a linear high-frequency probe 6-13 Megahertz of the SonoSite Micromax machine. A 22-gauge spinal needle will be advanced using the in-plane technique at the anterior axillary line, and the precise position of the needle tip between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscle will be visualized. To expand the plane, 2 mL of normal saline will be administered.

25ml volume on each side (20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5ml of normal saline containing 500 mcg neostigmine.

A 22-gauge spinal needle will be advanced using the in-plane technique at the anterior axillary line, and the precise position of the needle tip between the internal oblique and transverse abdominis muscle will be visualized. To expand the plane, 2 mL of normal saline will be administered. Following the affirmation of a hypoechoic region on the USG image, the study solutions will be injected as per group allocation. Postoperatively,both groups of patients received an injection of paracetamol 1gm intravenously every 8th hourly as a part of multimodal analgesia and the patients will be evaluated for pain, nausea or vomiting in the post anaesthesia care unit at time 0 (time of completion of TAP block), 2, 4, 6,12 and 24 h by an investigator blinded to the group assignment. Whenever the NRS >4, Nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg IV will be administered as a rescue analgesic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparasion of Postoperative NRS score for 24 hours between the two groups
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
NRS Score: used to assess pain intensity (13). It is one of the most commonly used pain scales in medicine. The NRS consists of a numeric version of the visual analog scale. It is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range. It is labeled from zero to ten, with zero being an example of someone with no pain and ten being the worst pain possible (Figure 2). This scale can be administered verbally. Rescue analgesia will be nalbuphine 0.1 mg/kg IV when the NRS ≥ 4.
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative hemodynamic parameters
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Hemodynamic parameters including HR
24 hours postoperative
time required for the first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
the time at wich the patient demand analgesia will be record for each patient
24 hours postoperative
total amount of rescue analgesic consumption duringfirst 24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
total amount of rescue analgesic consumption duringfirst 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperative
patient satisfacation score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative

five-point likert scale: to evaluate the patient satisfacation regarding the

to evaluate the patients' satisfaction regarding the whole procedure at the end of the postoperative 24 hours. It ranged from (1=very satisfied, 2=satisfied, 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4=dissatisfied, 5=very dissatisfied)

24 hours postoperative
PONV intensity by postoperatively:
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative

The number of attacks of nausea for 24 h will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h and will be recorded as yes/no.

  • The number of attacks of vomiting for 24 h will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h postoperatively and will be recorded as yes/no.
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Zain Alabdin Zaree Hassan, Assiut University
  • Study Director: Nashwa Farouk Abdel Hafez, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in cesarean section

Subscribe