Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study for The Safety of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With a Camera Holder Versus With a Camera Operator
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled study. The primary outcome based on non-inferior study design(α=0.05, power (1-β)=0.90); comparing a complications rate between Solo-SILC group and conventional cholecystectomy group (Ca-SILC).
Total of 272 patients who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to two groups according to a computer-generated table of random numbers Solo-SILC group using a laparoscopic camera holder (n=136) or Ca-SILC group in which a camera operator joins (n=136). .
Demographics (i.e., age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to open surgery or additional port will be recorded. Outcome including pain, hernia, complication rates, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, operator's workload will be investigated
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: YoungRok Choi, M.D.
- Phone Number: +821093212477
- Email: choiyoungrok@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ho-Jeong Jeong, R.N.
- Phone Number: +821095267743
- Email: r1441@snubh.org
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- all patient need laparoscopic cholecystectomy (check the possibility of routine application of Solo-SILC in clinical practice)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mirizzi syndrome
- unstable vital sign
- no compliance
- no consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Solo-SILC
Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC
|
Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Ca-SILC
No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
|
conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complication rate in Solo-Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)
Time Frame: average 2 weeks
|
intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications in Solo-SILC comparing with that in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
average 2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
complications in both groups
Time Frame: average 2 weeks
|
intraoperative and postoperative complications
|
average 2 weeks
|
|
Conversion rate
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
intraoperative conversion rate to open or additional port surgery
|
intraoperative
|
|
Incisional hernia
Time Frame: average 6 months
|
Umbilical incisional hernia incidence
|
average 6 months
|
|
Wound, back, and shoulder pain
Time Frame: postoperative 6 hr, 24 hr, 2 weeks after the operation
|
Access the patient's pain using the visual analog scale
|
postoperative 6 hr, 24 hr, 2 weeks after the operation
|
|
Postoperative adverse symptoms after SILC
Time Frame: average 2weeks after discharge
|
Diet change, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea
|
average 2weeks after discharge
|
|
number of participant with abnormal laboratory values
Time Frame: average 2weeks after discharge
|
postoperative laboratory findings on visiting outpatient's clinic
|
average 2weeks after discharge
|
|
Operator's workload
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
Access a operator's workload just after solo surgery comparing to Ca-SILC group using NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) score
|
intraoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Soyeon Ahn, Ph.D., Medical Research Collaboration Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 May;84(5):695. No abstract available.
- Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
- Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.
- Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
- Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
- Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, Manukyan MN, Simsek S, Kebudi A, Mercan S. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Dec;85(6):275-82. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
- Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Furst A. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
- Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, Hashimoto M. Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.944.
- Chuang SH, Chen PH, Chang CM, Lin CS. Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7743-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.
- Sinha R, Yadav AS. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Oct;10(4):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.141502.
- Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, Slayton SA. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
- Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SILC_HoOp
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
-
NCT03258177CompletedCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic | Appendectomy, Laparoscopic | Cholecystectomy, Robotic
-
NCT03143426CompletedComplication Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Conversion Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy
-
NCT04888117CompletedLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Robotic-assisted Cholecystectomy
-
NCT07027540Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06895200RecruitingCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
-
NCT06736496Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07437599Active, not recruiting
-
NCT06470360CompletedLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
-
NCT05755815CompletedLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Clinical Trials on Solo surgery
-
NCT07029997Not yet recruitingOtitis Media | Middle Ear Infections
-
NCT05741333Active, not recruitingOtitis Media | Ear Infection
-
NCT01055951CompletedType 1 Diabetes | Insulin Pump Users
-
NCT07482852Not yet recruiting
-
NCT03224364UnknownAppendicitis | Laparoscopic
-
NCT02978989UnknownCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
-
NCT01404338Completed
-
NCT05867641Recruiting
-
NCT07430605Not yet recruitingChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
-
NCT03722160UnknownOtitis Media | Ear Infection