Patients With Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (EPP-AFG-VVC)

October 17, 2018 updated by: Silvana Maria Quintana, University of Sao Paulo

Randomized Clinical Trial of a Mucoadhesive Gel Containing EPP-AF in Patients Diagnosed With Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

The present study aims to evaluate the safety of two mucoadhesive gels containing a propolis standardized extract identified as EPP-AF, with 1 and 2% of propolis. The efficacy studies with both propolis gels will be performed in comparison with clotrimazole cream in patients presenting vulvovaginal candidiasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vaginal candidiasis is the second infection of the genital tract after bacterial vaginosis. Up to 75% of women will have at least one episode in their lives, but the clinical manifestations can be very variable. Around 10 to 20% will be asymptomatic and 5 to 10% will have the recurrent candidiasis that means 4 or more episodes in a year. The predominant symptoms are pruritus in 89% and burning during urination and sexual intercourse in 66%. The therapeutic regimen for acute fungal infections by C. albicans should consider the intensity of the clinical symptoms, recurrence, patient preference for the route of administration and consequent adherence to treatment, presence of pregnancy and the possibility of side effects. In general, the schemes include anti-fungal substances of the azoles type. Intravaginal administration of drugs requires the development of formulations suited to the area and adherence to the treatment can be increased if mucoadhesive formulations are obtained which avoid discomfort and provide adequate release of the active compounds. In this sense, the present project had the objective of developing a mucoadhesive gel containing Propolis Standardized (EPP-AF®) for the treatment of vaginal candidiasis, especially since preclinical efficacy and safety data demonstrated the clinical potential of the product. So the present proposal aims at the clinical study evaluate the efficacy of two formulations with 1 and 2% of propolis in comparison with clotrimazole cream treatment (patients affected by Candidiasis) and also evaluate the safety of both propolis gels in healthy volunteers. The efficacy protocol of the test product in patients with vaginal candidiasis will be performed in an open-label, randomized, three-arm, clinical trial with active clotrimazole-based control. Patients will be recruited (T0) and evaluated at 10 and 30 days after initiation of treatment, and the primary outcome will be the clinical cure rate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Sao Paulo
      • Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 14049-900
        • Recruiting
        • Clinical Hospital of Sao Paulo University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Have performed the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of vulvovaginitis by Candida

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cPatients with recurrent candidiasis;
  • History of hepatic, renal, hematological, cardiovascular diseases and with decompensated diabetes mellitus (glycemia above 200) and obesity with BMI above 35);
  • Diagnosis of vulvovaginitis by another agent;
  • Make use of chronic antimicrobials (informed by the patient)
  • Be pregnant
  • Allergy to some component of medications given

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: EPP-AF Gel 1%
Group of patients that will be treated with EPP-AF mucoadhesive gel 1%, during 7 day, 1x/day.
Drug: EPP-AF Gel 1%
Administration intravaginal of EPP-AG Gel 1%, 1x/day, 7 days
Other Names:
  • Drug 1
Experimental: Clotrimazole cream
Group of patients that will be treated with clotrimazole cream, during 7 day, 1x/day.
Drug: Clotrimazole
Administration intravaginal of clotrimazol, 1x/day, 7 days
Other Names:
  • Active Comparator
Experimental: EPP-AF Gel 2%
Group of patients that will be treated with EPP-AF mucoadhesive gel 2%, during 7 day, 1x/day.
Drug: EPP-AF Gel 2%
Administration intravaginal of EPP-AG Gel 1%, 1x/day, 7 days
Other Names:
  • Drug 2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical cure
Time Frame: 10 days

Participants will be evaluated on the tenth day after insertion in the study (on the third day after the termination of the vaginal cream). The clinical cure will be evaluated by means of a questionnaire and specular examination. The possibilities will be:

  1. Candidacy Resolution
  2. No resolution of candidiasis

The questionnaire will be:

Pruritus: yes or no Burning: yes or no Dysuria: yes or no Edema of the genital area: yes or no Running: yes or no

The specular examination will evaluate:

Presence of hyperemia: yes or no Edema of the genital area: yes or no Presence of cracks: yes or no Pathological vaginal contents: yes or no The positive response to any of the questions or signs / symptoms will be considered as clinical failure
10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
microbiology cure
Time Frame: 10 days

Participants will be evaluated on the tenth day after insertion in the study (on the third day after the termination of the vaginal cream). The patient's clinical complaint will be evaluated and the specular examination will be performed. In this evaluation will be collected the following exams:

Vaginal pH measurement:

Normal 3.5 to 4.5 Abnormal> 4.5

Bacterioscopy with KOH10%:

Normal: absence of pseudohifas or other pathogenic elements Abnormal: presence of pseudohifas

Culture for candida albicans:

Normal: Negative Abnormal: positive

PCR for candida:

Normal negative Abnormal: positive

The possibilities will be:

  1. Candidacy Resolution
  2. No resolution of candidiasis It will be considered microbiological cure when all laboratory tests are considered normal
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Sao Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: silvana m quintana, phd, Sao Paulo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 03.12.0056.00
  • 2013/50496-2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: FAPESP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings