Ultrasound Imaging Technique in Detecting Breast Microcalcifications in Patients Undergoing Biopsy for a Breast Abnormality
Breast Microcalcifications Identified With MicroPure as a Marker for Malignancy Compared to Grayscale Ultrasound and Mammography (Using Biopsy as the Reference Standard)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate MicroPure relative to grayscale ultrasound imaging for the identification of microcalcifications with mammography as the reference standard.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Evaluate MicroPure compared to grayscale ultrasound imaging and mammography for the characterization of breast abnormalities associated with microcalcifications using biopsy results as the reference standard (sensitivity and specificity will be calculated).
II. Evaluate MicroPure relative to specimen x-ray imaging for the identification of breast microcalcifications with pathology as the reference standard.
III. Estimate the improvements in patient care that may be achievable if MicroPure guided core needle biopsy procedures can replace some surgical excisions for the evaluation of breast abnormalities.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Give written informed consent
- Be scheduled for a sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle biopsy or surgical excision for the evaluation of a breast lesion or abnormality containing microcalcifications seen on mammography
Exclusion Criteria:
- Is clinically unstable, severely ill, or moribund
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Diagnostic (standard ultrasound, MicroPure, biopsy)
Patients undergo grayscale and MicroPure ultrasound imaging followed by sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle biopsy or surgical resection.
Surgical specimens are then x-rayed.
|
Undergo standard ultrasound
Other Names:
Undergo MicoPure ultrasound
Undergo breast biopsy or surgical resection
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard).
The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant.
A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard).
The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant.
A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of microcalcifications determined by pathology findings
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The results of the three imaging methods will be compared to the pathology findings using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon for the assessment of breast lesions.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12D.17
- JT 1962 (Other Identifier: JeffTrial Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.