Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: Standardisation of Treatment Protocol

March 24, 2019 updated by: Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece

Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment Patients With Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction: Standardisation of Treatment Protocol

The present study aims to identify the efficacy saturation effect of low intensity extracorporeal shockwave treatment (LI-ESWT) using Aries ED device in men with mild-moderate and severe vasculogenic ED, who have previously responded to oral PDE5-Is. The efficacy and safety of 4 different session frequency protocols will be compared.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, 4 parallel arms, clinical trial with an 18-month recruitment period. All patients will be PDE5I users/responders. After 1 month wash-out period, ED patients will be screened, in order to randomize 96 men with vasculogenic ED, an International Index of Erectile Function ED (IIEF-ED) domain score between 6-25 and abnormal penile triplex-based hemodynamic parameters (peak flow velocity <35cm/sec) in the last 6 months. Additionally, they will be asked to complete the SEP diaries. Patients will be randomized to receive shockwave treatments (12 sessions for all subjects), either twice a week (total of 6 weeks) or three times a week (total of 4 weeks) at energy level 4 or 7, without treatment interval.

Study visits and duration

Visit 1 (day 0): the basic work-up will take place, including medical and sexual history, as well as necessary lab tests, if needed. One month wash-out period will follow. During this period, all subjects will be asked to avoid any drug related to ED (PDE5i) and have at least 2-4 attempts for intercourse. Furthermore, patients will undergo triplex ultrasonography, unless they have already done so in the last 6 months.Also penile dimensions in both flaccid and erect state will be measured.

Visit 2 (day 28 + 3 days): all patients will complete the IIEF-ED domain and will be randomized to one of the four parallel study groups, using an online program. Groups A and C will receive treatment twice per week, at energy level 4 and 7 respectively. Groups B and D will receive treatment three times per week, at energy level 4 and 7 respectively. PDE5i use is prohibited throughout the study.

Treatment Visits: There will be 12 active treatment visits for all 4 Groups. Patients will receive LI-ESWT, according to the study protocol. Interval between 2 treatments will be 3+1 days for Groups A and C (twice/week) whereas 1+1 day for Groups B and D (three times/week). At visit 6 and 12 a penile ultrasonography will be conducted in order to check for potential adverse events related to the treatment.

Follow-up visits 1 - 3 (4, 12 ,24 and 48 weeks post treatment): Patients will complete the IIEF-ED questionnaire and return the completed SEP diaries for the last 4 weeks prior to every visit. Visit data will also be recorded (protocol compliance, adverse events). At Week 12, triplex will be performed by the standard protocol. For Week 4 there is a + 3 days visit window, whereas for weeks 12, 24 and 48 there is a + 2 weeks visit window.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
96

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54621
        • G.Gennimatas Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Consent to participate
  2. Age >18
  3. Presence of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction for at least 6 months
  4. Positive response to PDE5i
  5. IIEF-ED score > 6 and IIEF score < 26 after wash out of PDE5i
  6. Abnormal penile triplex-based hemodynamic parameters (peak flow velocity <35cm/sec)
  7. Stable heterosexual relationship for more than 3 months
  8. Sexually active and agree to suspend all ED therapy for the duration of study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any cause of ED other than vascular related
  2. Previous radiation therapy to pelvis
  3. History of radical prostatectomy
  4. Clinically significant chronic haematological disease
  5. Cardiovascular conditions that prevent sexual activity
  6. Peyronie's Disease or penile curvature
  7. History of heart attack, stroke or any life- threatening arrhythmia within the prior 6 month
  8. Anti-androgens oral or injectables androgens
  9. Untreated Hypogonadism as demonstrated by abnormal testosterone levels
  10. Malignancy within the past 5 years
  11. Any unstable medical, psychiatric condition or spinal cord injury
  12. Anatomical or neurological abnormalities in the treatment area
  13. Use of any treatment for ED within 7 days of screening ( oral medications, vacuum devices, constrictive devices, injections or urethral suppositories)
  14. Known allergy to ultrasound gel

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A
Patients will receive 2 sessions of LI-ESWT per week for a 6 week period with energy level 4 (12 sessions totally)
Device: Aries ED device
The Dornier Aries-ED device will be used for the purpose of the study. LI-ESWT will be applied to the penile shaft 3 areas, and the 2 crura (two sites)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group B
Patients will receive 3 sessions of LI-ESWT per week for a 4 week period with energy level 4 (12 sessions totally)
Device: Aries ED device
The Dornier Aries-ED device will be used for the purpose of the study. LI-ESWT will be applied to the penile shaft 3 areas, and the 2 crura (two sites)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group C
Patients will receive 2 sessions of LI-ESWT per week for a 6 week period with energy level 7 (12 sessions totally)
Device: Aries ED device
The Dornier Aries-ED device will be used for the purpose of the study. LI-ESWT will be applied to the penile shaft 3 areas, and the 2 crura (two sites)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group D
Patients will receive 3 sessions of LI-ESWT per week for a 4 week period with energy level 7 (12 sessions totally)
Device: Aries ED device
The Dornier Aries-ED device will be used for the purpose of the study. LI-ESWT will be applied to the penile shaft 3 areas, and the 2 crura (two sites)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percent of subjects who achieve clinically important difference (MCID) in the EF domain score of the IIEF
Time Frame: baseline and 6 month follow up visit

MCID is defined according to baseline ED severity as:

  • Improvement by 2 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with mild ED ( EF scores 17-25) at baseline.
  • Improvement by 5 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED(EF scores 11-16) at baseline
  • Improvement by 7 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with severe ED (EF scores 0-10) at baseline
baseline and 6 month follow up visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mean peak systolic velocity (PSV)
Time Frame: baseline and 3 month follow up visit
Mean peak systolic velocity will be measured by penile triplex ultrasonography by the same investigator.
baseline and 3 month follow up visit
Change in the EF domain score of the IIEF
Time Frame: baseline, 6 month follow up visit and 12 month follow up visit
EF domain of the IIEF questionnaire will be completed
baseline, 6 month follow up visit and 12 month follow up visit
Change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score
Time Frame: baseline, 6 month follow up visit and 12 month follow up visit
The percent of subjects who answer ''YES'' in question 3 of SEP questionnaire will be reported
baseline, 6 month follow up visit and 12 month follow up visit
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time Frame: 54 weeks (Group A and Group C), 52 weeks (Group B and Group D)
Potential treatment related adverse events after the first LI-ESWT session and during the 12 month follow up period will be reported
54 weeks (Group A and Group C), 52 weeks (Group B and Group D)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 30, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 6, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13771/2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Erectile Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Aries ED device

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings