Caring for Babies: A Study of Ontario Maternal-Newborn Hospitals on the Implementation of Parent-targeted Education (ONesiE)
Caring for Babies: A Study of Ontario Maternal-Newborn Hospitals on the Implementation of Parent-targeted Education (ONesiE)
Newborn infants have blood work procedures for newborn screening and bilirubin testing in their first days of life that cause pain, distress and physiological changes. Breastfeeding (BF), skin to skin care (SSC), or giving small amounts of sweet solutions (sucrose or glucose) with or without a pacifier, effectively and safely reduce pain and distress in newborn infants during painful procedures. However, studies of neonatal pain management practices in Ontario and throughout Canada demonstrate inconsistent use of these strategies. There is a clear need for developing and testing acceptable parent-targeted interventions, alongside health care provider (HCP)-targeted knowledge translation (KT) interventions, to support parents' involvement in comforting their infants during painful procedures. To address this knowledge to action (KTA) gap, Denise Harrison's Be Sweet to Babies team developed the BSweet2Babies video, which demonstrates the effectiveness of BF, SSC, and sucrose during infant bloodwork and how parents can use and advocate for these pain management strategies.
This project addresses a knowledge to practice gap that is highly relevant to all babies and their families. Thus, this study has the potential to advance health care of all babies and contribute to the science of KT by evaluating the implementation of a parent-targeted and mediated KT strategy in diverse hospital settings.
Hospitals were eligible for inclusion if they (1) provide Level 1 or Level 2 maternal/newborn care contributing data to the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario (BORN) Information Systems (BIS); (2) have a birth volume of at least 50 per year; (3) have <85% use of pain management (BF,SSC, sucrose) during newborn screening or bilirubin sampling, as per BIS data; and (4) have < 50% missing data for the pain management data element in the BIS. Participating hospitals will receive a tablet and will offer all parents the 5 minute BSweet2Babies video before newborn bloodwork. BORN Information System (BIS) data will subsequently be analyzed to evaluate the use of BF, SSC and sweet solutions.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: Newborn infants have blood work procedures for newborn screening and bilirubin testing in their first days of life that cause pain, distress and physiological changes. Breastfeeding (BF), skin to skin care (SSC), or giving small amounts of sweet solutions (sucrose or glucose) with or without a pacifier, effectively and safely reduce pain and distress in newborn infants during painful procedures. However, studies of neonatal pain management practices in Ontario and throughout Canada demonstrate inconsistent use of these strategies. There is a clear need for developing and testing acceptable parent-targeted interventions, alongside health care provider-targeted knowledge translation (KT) interventions, to support parents' involvement in comforting their infants during painful procedures. To address this knowledge to action (KTA) gap, Denise Harrison's Be Sweet to Babies team developed the BSweet2Babies video, which demonstrates the effectiveness of BF, SSC, and sucrose during infant bloodwork and how parents can use and advocate for these pain management strategies.
Objectives: To conduct a process evaluation to understand during the 6-month intervention period; (1) to what extent did HCPs implement the BSweet2Babies video in their setting; (2) What were the barriers and facilitators encountered in implementing the BSweet2Babies video; (3) What were the barriers and facilitators encountered in implementing the evidence shown in the BSweet2babies video (i.e. breastfeeding, skin-to-skin care, sucrose).
Study design and methods: Sequential exploratory mixed methods study. The mixed methods implementation study includes process evaluation, exploration of facilitators and barriers to implementation of the video and uptake of the demonstrated recommended pain management of BF, SSC or sucrose during initial blood sampling by heel prick.
Data Analysis: Directed content analysis will be used to analyse the qualitative data (i.e. monthly phone calls and bi-monthly community of practice teleconferences). Interview data will be transcribed verbatim with consent. A deductive and inductive approach will be used to code the qualitative data with codes developed apriori based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Any concepts that do not fit within the framework will be assigned a new code.
Process evaluation will be described and summarized according to the process evaluation of complex intervention guide.
BORN Ontario data analysts in consultation with CoI Taljaard will conduct analysis using descriptive statistics to compare characteristics of participating sites and births including unit type (Level 1 compared to Level 2), birth volume, infant sex, and parity. In addition, BIS pain data will be reported as baseline and following the 6- month implementation period.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion criteria for hospitals include:
- Hospitals providing Level 1 and Level 2 maternal/newborn care contributing data to the BIS
- A birth volume of at least 50 per year
Hospitals will be excluded if they:
- >85% use of pain management (BF, SSC, sucrose) during newborn screening
- >50% missing data for the pain management data element in the BIS. element.
- two hospitals that were used as pilot sites will be excluded
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Enrolled
Participating hospitals will offer the video to all parents on their MBU during the 6 month intervention period (using the preferred delivery methods of the hospital and the parents). The video will be available via multiple means to facilitate optimal parental exposure in diverse settings. This will ensure flexibility of the delivery of the intervention, based on preferences of the nominated nurse leaders and their HCP team, families and available resources. All participating maternal/newborn centres will receive the following tools via the designated nurse unit leader of enrolled sites:
|
The video portrays three babies having blood tests while being i) BF, ii) held SSC with the mother, and iii) receiving sucrose.
The calming effects of these strategies are powerfully portrayed.
Voice-over in user-friendly language explains how parents can help their babies by partnering with clinicians to use these strategies.
As per the definition of patient-targeted and mediated interventions, this video is: i) patient (parent)-targeted, as it actively engages parents to improve their knowledge, positively affect their experience (during newborn screening), change their behavior and their baby's outcomes; ii) patient-mediated, as the video enables parents to change health professional behavior.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Process Evaluation
Time Frame: 7 months.
|
Directed content analysis will be used to analyze data from monthly interview, bi-monthly teleconferences and end of intervention surveys
|
7 months.
|
|
BORN BIS Pain Data
Time Frame: Six months prior to study launch date.
|
Number of effective pain treatment used during newborn screening.
|
Six months prior to study launch date.
|
|
BORN BIS Pain Data
Time Frame: Six months following completion of the intervention.
|
Number of effective pain treatment used during newborn screening.
|
Six months following completion of the intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Denise Harrison, RN, PhD, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHEO REB# 17/01CTO
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
NCT00866164Approved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
NCT07190807RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg Pain
-
NCT03727373CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, Cancer
-
NCT03597737CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Oncology
-
NCT07454083Not yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
NCT01576978CompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
NCT07274293CompletedCervical Pain | Pain Management | Lumbar Pain | Muscular | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck)
-
NCT07144033Not yet recruitingPain, Acute | Chronic Post Operative Pain | Pain, Chronic
-
NCT05616702RecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back Pain
-
NCT04727749CompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable
Clinical Trials on Parent-targeted BSweet2Babies video
-
NCT03294590CompletedHealth Behavior | Caries, Dental
-
NCT01606891CompletedChildhood Obesity
-
NCT06184243RecruitingSocial Skills | Parents | Development Delay
-
NCT06801366RecruitingObstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
-
NCT04544501CompletedHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
-
NCT06535139RecruitingPapillomavirus Vaccines
-
NCT05130606RecruitingHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
-
NCT07230743RecruitingAnxiety | Induction of Anesthesia | Anxiety Preoperative | Technology Use | Child Anxiety | Anesthesia Care | Anxiety After Surgery