Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study) (SPLENIQ)
Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study) Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes of Treatment for Splenic Injury After Trauma
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome after conservative therapy, embolization (proximal versus distal) or surgery in patients with traumatic splenic injury. Secondary aims: (I) to examine therapy-related complications, (II) to establish the necessity of additional therapies, (III) the assessment of splenic function related to splenic morphology (MR imaging) after embolization and (IV) to find the prognostic factors for failure of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with splenic injuries. Finally, with the acquired data from this study a patient-oriented protocol will be provided for the management of traumatic splenic injury.
HYPOTHESIS:
The investigators expect that NOM is superior to surgery with regard to QOL, clinical outcome and splenic function. Embolization will need more additional therapies. Splenic morphology is related to splenic immune function. Expected prognostic factors are age above 40, ISS >25 and a splenic injury grade of 3 or higher.
STUDY DESIGN:
A combination of a retrospective and a prospective multicentre cohort study. This protocol involves the prospective part of the study.
STUDY POPULATION/DATASET:
Patients who enter the participating hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 with splenic injury will be asked to participate. The follow-up period will be one year with regard to QOL, clinical symptoms and imaging.
INTERVENTION:
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. The patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) will undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome is QOL. Secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms and imaging.
SAMPLE SIZE:
Approximately 100 patients will be included per year during the inclusion phase.
DATA ANALYSIS:
With regard to the prospective data linear modelling will be performed.
COLLABORATION/CONNECTION:
Tilburg University, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam, Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht, Amphia hospital Breda, Leiden University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Medical Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Nijmegen, Isala Zwolle.
TIME SCHEDULE:
Year 1: literature search and conducting the retrospective study and analyses. Years 1-3: inclusion prospective study and follow-up of patients. Year 4: finishing follow-up data collection and analysing.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gelderland
-
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
- Radboud University Medical Center
-
-
Noord-Brabant
-
Breda, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 4800 RL
- Amphia Hospital
-
Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, 5000 LC
- Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital
-
-
Noord-Holland
-
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HV
- VU University Medical Center
-
-
Overijssel
-
Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands, 7512 KZ
- Medical spectrum Twente
-
Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands, 8025 AB
- Isala
-
-
Zuid-Holland
-
Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3300 AK
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital
-
Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
- Leiden University Medical Center
-
Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3000 CA
- Erasmus MC
-
Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3007 AC
- Maasstad Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma (confirmed by FAST and/or CT)
- The patient underwent NOM/SAE/splenectomy for the management of traumatic splenic injury
- The treatment took place in the period from March 2017 to December 2018 at one of the five selected hospitals
- 18 years or older.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Patients who died during or after treatment are (of course) excluded for questionnaires and MRI, not for clinical outcomes
Exclusion for MRI only:
- Patients treated with SAE: patients who do not want to or are not able to undergo an MRI abdomen (for example pregnant women or other contraindications for MRI). Patients excluded for MRI still need to fill out the questionnaires. Also, their clinical outcomes will be processed in the database.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Non-Operative Management (NOM)/Observational
Patients "treated" observationally for (traumatic) spleen injury.
|
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points.
|
|
Splenic Artery Embolization
Patients treated with splenic artery embolization for (traumatic) spleen injury.
|
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points.
Patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization will also undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
|
|
Surgery
Patients treated surgically for (traumatic) spleen injury.
|
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life: baseline (within 1 week after treatment)
Time Frame: One week after treatment
|
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires
|
One week after treatment
|
|
Quality of life: 1 month follow-up
Time Frame: One month after treatment
|
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
|
One month after treatment
|
|
Quality of life: 3 months follow-up
Time Frame: Three months after treatment
|
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
|
Three months after treatment
|
|
Quality of life: 6 months follow-up
Time Frame: Six months after treatment
|
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
|
Six months after treatment
|
|
Quality of life: one year follow-up
Time Frame: One year after treatment
|
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
|
One year after treatment
|
|
Change in health status: SF-12
Time Frame: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
|
SF-12 questionnaire
|
One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
|
|
Change in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
|
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
|
One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: One year follow-up
|
Data obtained from the patient records (e.g.
complications, need for re-intervention, hospital stay, return to daily activities)
|
One year follow-up
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: One year follow-up
|
The overall cost-effectiveness will be assessed with the iPCQ and iMCQ questionnaires, completed at different time points
|
One year follow-up
|
|
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one month after treatment)
Time Frame: One month after embolization
|
Splenic morphological characteristics (e.g.
volume, necrosis, splenosis, calcifications or chronic infarction morphology)
|
One month after embolization
|
|
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one year after treatment)
Time Frame: One year after embolization
|
Splenic morphological characteristics (e.g.volume, necrosis, splenosis, calcifications or chronic infarction morphology)
|
One year after embolization
|
|
Splenic Artery Embolization characteristics
Time Frame: One year follow-up
|
Difference between proximal versus distal embolization
|
One year follow-up
|
|
Prognostic factors for failure of Non-Operative Management
Time Frame: One year follow-up
|
A recent study suggests that there are prognostic factors for failure of NOM in the treatment of adults with (blunt) splenic injury.
Strong evidence exists for: age of 40 years or above, Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25 or greater and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury grade of 3 or greater.
|
One year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jolanda de Vries, Prof. dr., Project leader (ETZ Tilburg, Tilburg University)
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NL54542.028.16 / P1609
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
NCT07378215RecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-Life
-
NCT04239183UnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
NCT02901639UnknownImproving Quality of Life
-
NCT04761367CompletedImprove Quality of Life
-
NCT05722249CompletedProfessional Quality of Life
-
NCT06014671CompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life of
-
NCT06262334RecruitingHealth Related Quality of Life
-
NCT01155076CompletedHealth-related Quality of Life
-
NCT01784497CompletedHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Questionnaires
-
NCT00712569Completed
-
NCT07578272Not yet recruiting
-
NCT04893070Completed
-
NCT06290115Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05587595RecruitingIntensive Care Unit Syndrome | Pediatric Post-intensive Care Syndrome
-
NCT06831240Not yet recruitingStroke | Amputation | Spinal Cord Injury | Caregivers | Wheelchair Users | Wheelchair Service Providers
-
NCT02957565CompletedAdvanced Cancer | Malignant Neoplasms of Independent (Primary) Multiple Sites
-
NCT02928731Completed
-
NCT05755347CompletedBreast Cancer | Metastasis
-
NCT00579917CompletedLeukemia | Multiple Myeloma | Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma | Hodgkin's Disease