Chronic Effects Using Light-Emitting Diode Therapy (LEDT) During a Resistance Exercise Protocol for Asthmatic Patients

April 9, 2017 updated by: Ivan Peres Costa, University of Nove de Julho

Chronic Effects Using Light-Emitting Diode Therapy (LEDT) During a Resistance Exercise Protocol for Moderate to Severe Asthmatic Patients: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of LED phototherapy associated with a resistance training protocol on the peripheral muscle function of moderate to severe asthmatic patients ..

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This research project will be prospective, analytical and of the randomized controlled clinical trial type, with blind evaluator. The sample type will be consecutive from Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo. We will study 30 adults of both sexes with moderate to severe asthma between the ages of 20 and 70, based on the sample calculation of the outcomes of this study.

Adult individuals 20 years of age or older with a diagnosis of moderate to severe asthma of both sexes, attended at the Ambulatory of Difficult Asthma Control of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo.

Exclusion terms include subjects diagnosed as having heart disease associated with pulmonary disease, musculoskeletal pathology that may interfere with assessment or exercise, pulmonary hypertension, calcium absorption deficiency, BMI ≥ 30 or difficulty learning.

The subjects will initially be pre-evaluated by performing pulmonary function tests, peripheral muscle strength (1-RM), functional capacity tests, physical activity questionnaires and clinical control of asthma and cardiopulmonary exercise test. After the evaluation, patients will be randomized into two resistance training groups, one of them associated with active LED phototherapy and another LED phototherapy placebo.

The resistance exercise protocol will be performed on the muscles: Pectoral, Large Dorsal, Brachial Biceps, Brachial Triceps, Quadriceps and Tibial Ischia. The intensity will be from 40 to 70% obtained in the 1-RM test with two to three sets of ten repetitions.

The load increase will be performed weekly (5%) according to patient tolerance. After 12 weeks all subjects were reevaluated and the last reevaluation occurred at the end of the training program. Patients will only effectively begin participating in this study after explaining the terms of the survey and by accepting written consent from the ICF.

The mean (in kg) of the resistance training protocol for lower limbs in knee extension of group 1 was 33 ± 13 kg and the mean of group 2 was 46 ± 11 kg. The sample calculation was based on the load of the quadriceps muscle, α = 0.05 and β = 95%, determining a minimum of fourteen individuals for each group. An additional 10% was added to compensate for possible losses during the protocol. Thus a minimum of fifteen individuals will be required for the study.

Linear regression models will be used to evaluate the effect of the LED on the results (absolute change and percentage) and a sensitivity analysis with the values of the results in the revaluation, adjusted by the initial value of each result. The possible correlations between the variables can be evaluated using Pearson's correlation. The level of significance adopted will be p <0.5. The analyzes were performed with SPSS 20 software.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05415-012
        • Ivan Peres Costa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a medical outpatient setting less than six months; With a stable clinical picture during three months, ie without exacerbations and with optimized drug therapy.

Signed an informed consent form (TCLE) accepting participation in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of heart disease associated with lung disease, musculoskeletal disease that may interfere with assessment or exercise, pulmonary hypertension, calcium absorption deficiency, BMI ≥ 30, or difficulty learning.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: photobiomodulation by active LEDT
The subjects will be initially pre-evaluated by performing pulmonary function tests, peripheral muscle strength tests, functional capacity tests, physical activity questionnaires and clinical control of asthma, and cardiopulmonary exercise test. After the evaluation, patients will be randomized into two resistance training groups, one of them being associated to the intervention with active photobiomodulation by LEDT to increase peripheral muscle function post resistance training.
Device: Light-Emitting Diode Therapy (LEDT)
Light-emitting diode, has effects similar to the photobiomodulation by low-level laser intensity.
Other Names:
  • photobiomodulation by LEDT
Placebo Comparator: photobiomodulation by Placebo LEDT
The subjects will be initially pre-evaluated by performing pulmonary function tests, peripheral muscle strength tests, functional capacity tests, physical activity questionnaires and clinical control of asthma, and cardiopulmonary exercise test. After the evaluation, patients will be randomized into two resistance training groups, one of them being associated to the intervention with placebo LEDT photobiomodulation to increase peripheral muscle function post resistance training.
Device: Light-Emitting Diode Therapy (LEDT)
Light-emitting diode, has effects similar to the photobiomodulation by low-level laser intensity.
Other Names:
  • photobiomodulation by LEDT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pectoral Muscular Strength by 1RM.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the pectoral muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Major Dorsal Muscular Strength by 1RM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the major dorsal muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Femoral Quadriceps Muscular Strength by 1RM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the femoral quadriceps muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Brachial Triceps Muscular Strength by 1RM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the brachial triceps muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Brachial Biceps Muscular Strength by 1RM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the brachial biceps muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Tibial Ischia Muscular Strength by 1RM
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.
Muscle strength will be assessed in the tibial ischia muscle group, using the maximal repetition (1RM) test to quantify the resistance training load (between 60 and 80%).
Change from Baseline Peripheral muscular Strength up to 24 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Capacity by Cardiopulmonary exercise test.
Time Frame: Change from baseline measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test up to 24 weeks.
The cardiopulmonary test will be performed in an electricomagnetic braking cycle ergometer connected to a system composed of gas analysis module attached to a module flow/wave analyzer and a microcomputer BreezeCardiO2 System. (medical Graphics Corporation - MGC, St. Paul, Mo, USA).
Change from baseline measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test up to 24 weeks.
Functional Capacity by Incremental Shuytle Walk Test.
Time Frame: Change from baseline measured by Incremental Shuttle Walk Test distance up to 24 weeks.
The incremental shuttle walk test was performed based on the original test description. The patient walk from side to side in a space of 10 meters identified by two cones inserted 0.5 from each end to avoid such sudden changes in speed. The participant was instructed to walk from cone to cone in one. A single point that the participant must keep pace and a triple beep indicates the beginning of a new level, the height at which the participant has increased the pace. The test comprised 12 levels, each lasting one minute. The speed of the first level was 1.8 Km/h, with an increase of 0.17 m/s every minute until reaching a top speed of 8.53 Km/h. The test was stopped when the participant was unable to reach the cone before the next beep.
Change from baseline measured by Incremental Shuttle Walk Test distance up to 24 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nove de Julho

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fabiano Politti
LUCIANA MARIA MALOSA SAMPAIO

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Luciana MM Sampaio, PhD, University of Nove de Julho

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ERAMG-LED-PL-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared with other researchers since there is no third party interest in the data collected.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Resistance Training

Clinical Trials on Light-Emitting Diode Therapy (LEDT)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings