Auricular Acupuncture vs. Sham Procedure for Pain Control After Knee Arthroplasty (AA_K-TEP)

April 10, 2017 updated by: University Medicine Greifswald

Auricular Acupuncture (AA) vs. Sham AA Procedure for Pain Control After Elective Knee Arthroplasty - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim of the study To investigate whether auricular acupuncture (AA) will reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in comparison with sham AA in patients after elective knee arthroplasty

Design Prospective randomized controlled blinded clinical trial

Participants:

  • Patients < 80 und > 50 years old
  • scheduled for knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia with < 120 minutes duration
  • Without previous opioid medication
  • Able to give informed consent

Outcome measures

  • Postoperative analgesic requirement
  • Incidence of side effects
  • Physiological parameters

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III scheduled for elective knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia
  2. Surgery time does not exceed 120 minutes
  3. Patients without previous opioid medication
  4. Patients ranged 50-80 years old
  5. Patients who have given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recidivist alcoholics
  2. Local auricular skin infection
  3. Age < 50 and > 80 years
  4. Surgery time more than 120 minutes
  5. Intraoperative complications (bleeding, required blood transfusion more than 6 units of packed cells, cardiovascular instability, required catecholamines)
  6. Patients who consumed opioid medication at least 6 months before surgery
  7. Patients with prosthetic or damaged cardiac valves, intracardiac and intravascular shunts, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and mitral valve prolaps (risk of bacterial endocarditis according to guidelines of AHA)
  8. Patients who are unable to understand the consent form
  9. History of psychiatric disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Auricular acupuncture
Auricular acupuncture (AA) with indwelling fixed needles at specific AA points
Auricular acupuncture with indwelling fixed needles at specific AA points
Sham Comparator: Sham auricular acupuncture
Sham auricular acupuncture with indwelling fixed needles at non- AA points
Sham auricular acupuncture (AA) with indwelling fixed needles applied at non-AA points

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative requirement of analgesic tilidine (measured in mg)
Time Frame: Six days following surgery
Requirement of opioid analgesic tilidin
Six days following surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects of analgesics
Time Frame: Six days following surgery
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
Six days following surgery
heart rate
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
heart rate
12 hours after surgery
blood pressure
Time Frame: 12 hours following surgery
blood pressure
12 hours following surgery
Patients' satisfaction with the treatment of postoperative pain using NRS-5 (where 1=excellent; 5=very bad)
Time Frame: 12 hours following surgery
12 hours following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BB 102/11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Auricular acupuncture

Search Similar Trials