Effect of Simethicone on Screening Colonoscopy

June 3, 2019 updated by: Antonio Mendoza-Ladd, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

The Effect Of Adding High Dose Simethicone To A Standard Polyethylene Glycol Preparation On Adenoma Detection Rate During Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

This study is evaluating the effect of adding a high dose of simethicone to the standard polyethylene glycol preparation for screening colonoscopy in the quality of the preparation , adenoma detection rate and withdrawal times.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A proper bowel preparation is key to a thorough and safe colonoscopy. Several factors affect the mucosal visualization during colonoscopy, and consequently the quality of such evaluation. Undoubtedly, this can have unfavorable implications like missed lesions. One of the most commonly encountered scenarios is the presence of multiple bubbles that interfere with mucosal visualization. When this occurs, simethicone (an antifoam agent used to reduce bloating when ingested orally) is injected through the colonoscope to eliminate the bubbles and get a clear view of the mucosa. A few studies have used oral simethicone in conjunction with oral preparation agents (PEG, magnesium citrate, sodium phosphate) in an attempt to improve the quality of the preparation. Unfortunately these studies have not used the exact same preparation agent with and without simethicone, making it difficult to draw conclusions on its efficacy. However, it is important to understand that simethicone is not intended to decrease the amount of stool in the colon, and it's purpose is to decrease the amount of bubbles interfering with the visualization of the mucosa provided that there is no stool present . Furthermore, it is unclear if adding simethicone to a standard bowel preparation makes a significant difference in key aspects of screening colonoscopy such as adenoma detection rate or withdrawal times. This prospective randomized controlled, observer blinded study at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in El Paso, aims at studying the effect of simethicone on the overall colon preparation as well as on adenoma detection rate and withdrawal times.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
268

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • El Paso, Texas, United States, 79905
        • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients between the ages of 30-80 scheduled for screening colonoscopy.
  2. Male and female patients
  3. Ambulatory patients
  4. Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous colonic surgery
  2. Patient with mental/physical condition that impairs oral ingestion of preparation
  3. Allergy or hypersensitivity to simethicone
  4. Patients with limited mobility (bedridden patients)
  5. Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction
  6. Patients with gastroparesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Simethicone solution + Polyethylenglycol
This arm of the study will include the patients assigned to take simethicone solution with their colon preparations ( 4L Polyethyleneglycol)
Drug: Simethicone Solution
Patients will be assigned randomly to take Simethicone Solution plus polyethylenglycol
Other Names:
  • mylicon
Active Comparator: Polyethylenglycol
This arm of the study will include the patients assigned to take a regular bowel preparation (4L Polyethylenglycol)
Other: Polyethylenglycol
Patients in this arm will be randomly assigned to take polyethylenglycol as their regular bowel preparation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma Detection Rate
Time Frame: 25 minutes
The number of adenomatous polyps removed at colonoscopy
25 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Withdrawal Times
Time Frame: 6-10 minutes
Amount spent withdrawing the scope during the colonoscopy
6-10 minutes
Colon Preparation
Time Frame: 25 minutes

Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS): scale that rates the quality of the colon preparation based on the amount of stool present. 0:solid stool that cannot be cleared; 1:areas not well seen due to residual stool and/or opaque liquid; 2:small fragments of stool and/or opaque liquid, but mucosa seen well; 3:no residual stool or opaque liquid seen. Score determined by adding the score of each individual segment of the colon (right side, transverse and left side). Scores range from 0 to 3 in each segment, therefore, a total composite score ranges from 0 (poor) to 9 (excellent).

Bubble Score (BS): scale that rates the amount of bubbles present in the colon. 0:no or minimal bubbles; 1:bubbles covering up to half the luminal diameter; 2:bubbles covering the circumference of the lumen; 3:bubbles filling the entire lumen. Score determined the same way as BBPS score but in this case a total score of 0 is excellent and 9 is poor.
25 minutes
Intraprocedural Use of Simethicone
Time Frame: 6-10 minutes
The number of colonoscopies during which the endoscopist requested simethicone to be flushed through the endoscope.
6-10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio H Mendoza-Ladd, MD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E17034

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenoma Colon

Clinical Trials on Simethicone Solution

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings