High Volume Simethicone VCE Clinical Trial

January 7, 2020 updated by: Michael Sai Lai Sey, MD, Lawson Health Research Institute

A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of High Volume Simethicone to Improve Visualization During Capsule Endoscopy

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a procedure where a small camera is swallowed to examine the small bowel. Although the procedure is useful for diagnosing small bowel diseases, air bubbles can obscure the recorded images. Simethicone is a medication that can be used to disperse the air bubbles. However, prior studies using this medication have shown only a modest benefit. In our study, we would like to investigate whether increasing the amount of medication will improve the recorded images further.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

While VCE has become an important diagnostic tool for clinical practice, optimal preparation for VCE has yet to be determined.(13) The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends bowel preparation but does not provide further details.(2) The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American College of Gastroenterology, and American Gastroenterological Association make no specific recommendation. Many studies have addressed this knowledge gap, testing various regimens of purgatives.(14-18) A meta-analysis found that polyethylene glycol provided adequate visual quality in 68% of patients compared to 48% with fasting alone, while diagnostic yield climbed from 36% to 46%.(4) In contrast, oral preparation for colonoscopy produces adequate visualization in greater than 90% of patients.(19)

Intraluminal debris, bile, and air bubbles impair the visibility of small bowel mucosa during VCE. Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent, has been used with mixed success to improve image quality. Three studies investigated the addition of simethicone (30 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg) to overnight fast, PEG, or mannitol demonstrated improvement in visualization with high preparation scores favouring the addition of simethicone.(7-9) In contrast, Wei and colleagues (10) compared simethicone (300 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and found that although simethicone improved visualization, adequate visualization was achieved in only 63% of patients. Similarly, Ge et al. (11) compared simethicone (300 mg) against fasting alone and found improvement in visualization with simethicone but this was limited to the proximal half of the small bowel and adequate visualization was limited to 55% of cases. Lastly, Rosa et al. (12) compared simethicone (100 mg) + PEG with PEG alone and did not find a difference in visualization score.

A potential reason for inconsistent improvement in small bowel visualization may be due to an inadequate volume of simethicone being delivered into the small bowel, especially the distal portions. Prior volumes of simethicone were small (<200 ml) and may have pooled in the stomach and become diluted by gastric juices before being delivered into the duodenum. Our hypothesis is that high volume simethicone may overcome this problem and improve small bowel cleansing to facilitate improved visualization during VCE.

STUDY DESIGN:

This is a double blind randomized clinical trial evaluating high volume simethicone (750 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) versus standard volume simethicone (200 ml at 1.5 mg/ml) for CE. Randomization will be performed in blocks of varying sizes through a web based interface, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), to ensure concealed allocation. Patients, physicians, and outcome assessors will be blinded to randomization allocation.

INTERVENTION:

All patients will take a standard small bowel preparation consisting of the following starting the day before the procedure: clear fluids starting at lunch, two liters of PEG at 8 PM, and fasting starting at midnight. Patients arrive in the endoscopy unit at 6:45 AM the following morning. Randomization is performed via REDCap and simethicone given as follows: those randomized to high volume simethicone will drink a 750 ml solution (1125 mg simethicone diluted in 750 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) and those randomized to standard volume simethicone will drink a 200 ml solution (300 mg simethicone diluted in 200 ml of water, 1.5 mg/ml) in identical non-transparent lidded cups sealed with tamper tape prepared by the hospital's Clinical Trials Pharmacy and administered to the patient by the research nurse. Regardless of randomization results, the solution will be consumed over a 5 minute period and the patient instructed to resume fasting for 30 minutes before swallowing the capsule. Adherence will be assessed by collection of the cups after ingestion.

After swallowing the capsule, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit, encouraged to remain active for the day, allowed to have clear fluids in 2 hours, a light meal in 4 hours, and to return the CE recorder to the endoscopy unit at 5 PM. Once the CE recorder is returned, the patient is discharged from the endoscopy unit and has completed the study. Subjects will be called by the study nurse 7 days later to assess for adverse events.

CE will be performed with the Given Imaging SB3 capsule and reviewed with the accompanying software, RAPID v8.3. Videos will be reviewed in a blinded fashion without knowledge of randomization results using the Park score.(41)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

159

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Sciences Centre- Victoria Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients undergoing small bowel video capsule endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with a contraindication to VCE (small bowel strictures, oropharyngeal dysphagia, pregnancy, patients who are not surgical candidates)
  2. Endoscopic insertion of video capsule endoscope
  3. Inpatient procedures for active GI bleeding
  4. Patients with fluid restriction or who are unable to drink up to 900 ml of fluid within 10 minutes prior to the VCE

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High volume simethicone
High volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).
High volume simethicone is defined as 1125 mg simethicone in 750 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).
Active Comparator: Standard volume simethicone
Standard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).
Standard volume simethicone is defined as 300 mg simethicone in 200 ml of water (1.5 mg/ml).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visualization quality
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
Visualization quality will be scored in a blinded fashion using a validated score developed by Park et al. (World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(7):875-80.) Representative images from the small bowel will be serially selected at five-minute intervals. Each image is evaluated for two parameters: the proportion of visualized mucosa (VM) and degree of obscuration (DO) by bubbles, debris etc. The proportion of visualized mucosa is scored on a three- point scale: > 75% = 3, 50% to 75% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, <25% = 0. The degree of obscuration is also scored in a three point scale: < 5 % = 3, 5% to 25% = 2, 25% to 50% = 1, > 50 % = 0. Mean scores for each parameter are obtained by dividing the sum of all images scored by the number of images. Finally the average of the two parameters is calculated. Both the whole, proximal, and distal small bowel will be scored separately. The first half of the small bowel will be considered proximal while the second half will be considered distal.
Once during review of capsule images

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visualized mucosa sub-score
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
The 'Visualized Mucosa' sub-score of the visualization quality score described above.
Once during review of capsule images
Degree of obscuration sub-score
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
The 'Degree of Obstruction' sub-score of the visualization quality score described above.
Once during review of capsule images
Diagnostic Yield
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images

A.The study will be considered 'diagnostic' if a clinically relevant lesion is found.

B. The lesion may be clinically related to the referral indication or incidental.

C. Lesions will be classified into: angioectasia, ulceration, stricture, polyp, mass, or other.

Once during review of capsule images
Study Completion Rate
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
Study will be considered complete if the capsule passes into the cecum.
Once during review of capsule images
Gastric Emptying Time
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
Defined as the time from the first gastric image until the first duodenal image.
Once during review of capsule images
Small Bowel Transit Time
Time Frame: Once during review of capsule images
Defined as the time from the first duodenum image until the first cecal image
Once during review of capsule images
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Once 7 days after the procedure.
Adverse events will be defined as new abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, bloating, and other between 0-7 days after the procedure that is different than pre-existing symptoms.
Once 7 days after the procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael SL Sey, MD, London Health Sciences Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Small Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on High Volume Simethicone

3
Subscribe