Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Delamanid in Combination With Optimized Multidrug Background Regimen (OBR) for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Children With MDR-TB With and Without HIV

A Phase I/II Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Delamanid in Combination With Optimized Multidrug Background Regimen (OBR) for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Children With MDR-TB With and Without HIV

This Phase I/II study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the anti-tuberculosis (TB) drug delamanid (DLM) in combination with an optimized multidrug background regimen (OBR) for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in children with MDR-TB with and without HIV.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the anti-TB drug DLM in combination with OBR for MDR-TB in children with MDR-TB with and without HIV.

Participants were enrolled in one of four age cohorts: 12 to less than 18 years, 6 to less than 12 years, 3 to less than 6 years, or 0 to less than 3 years. All participants were to receive DLM doses according to their age group and weight for 24 weeks.

Study visits occurred at study entry; Weeks 2 and 4; every 4 weeks through Week 40; and at Weeks 48, 60, 72, and 96. Visits included physical examinations; blood, urine, and sputum collection; chest x-rays; electrocardiograms (ECGs); hearing tests; medical history reviews; adherence assessments; and acceptability questionnaires.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411001
        • Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College (BJMC) CRS
    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
        • Sizwe CRS
    • North West
      • Klerksdorp, North West, South Africa, 2574
        • PHRU Matlosana CRS
    • Western Cape
      • Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7505
        • Desmond Tutu TB Centre - Stellenbosch University (DTTC-SU) CRS
      • Moshi, Tanzania
        • Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Parent (or legal guardian) willing and able to provide written informed consent for child study participation. Additionally, for children whose assent is required per site institutional review board/ethics committee (IRB/EC) policies and procedures, child willing and able to provide written assent for his or her study participation.

  • HIV status determined by testing requirements in the protocol (see the protocol for more information on this criterion)
  • If living with HIV: Initiated the standard of care antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen at least two weeks prior to enrollment (note: regimens including efavirenz [EFV], nevirapine [NVP], a boosted protease inhibitor [PI], or integrase strand transfer inhibitor [INSTI] are allowed)
  • Confirmed or probable MDR-TB classified as follows:

    • Confirmed MDR-TB (or rifampicin mono-resistant TB [RMR-TB], pre-extensively drug-resistant [XDR] or XDR-TB):

      *Intra-thoracic (pulmonary) TB based on chest radiograph consistent with TB, and/or any of the following forms of extrathoracic TB:

      1. Peripheral TB lymphadenitis
      2. Pleural effusion or fibrotic pleural lesions
      3. Stage 1 TB meningitis
      4. Miliary and abdominal TB
      5. Other non-disseminated forms of TB disease (see also exclusion criterion below)

        AND

        • Microbiological confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from any clinical specimen by either culture or molecular methods (including Xpert MTB/RIF)

        AND

        *Drug-resistance demonstrated by genotypic (molecular) or phenotypic methods, with any of the following resistance patterns:

        *MDR-TB (resistance to both rifampicin and isoniazid (INH))

        • RMR-TB or where additional INH resistance has not been confirmed (i.e., isolated Xpert MTB/RIF rifampicin resistance)
        • Pre-XDR-TB (MDR-TB plus resistance to any fluoroquinolone)
        • XDR-TB (MDR-TB plus resistance to both a fluoroquinolone and at least one additional Group A drug, i.e., bedaquiline or linezolid) Note: RMR-TB, MDR-TB, pre-XDR-TB and XDR-TB are therefore collectively referred to as "MDR-TB" for the purposes of the protocol
    • Probable MDR-TB (or RMR, pre-XDR or XDR-TB), with inclusion of intrathoracic and/or extrathoracic TB as listed below:

      *A presumptive diagnosis of intrathoracic (pulmonary) TB based on well-documented clinical symptoms or signs of TB AND chest radiograph consistent with TB, and/or any of the following forms of extrathoracic TB:

      1. Peripheral TB lymphadenitis
      2. Pleural effusion or fibrotic pleural lesions
      3. Stage 1 TB meningitis
      4. Miliary and abdominal TB,
      5. Other non-disseminated forms of TB disease (see also exclusion criterion below)

        AND

        • One of the following:
        • Exposure to a confirmed MDR-TB source case$ (RMR-TB, pre-XDR-TB, XDR-TB)
        • Documented failure to respond to a first-line regimen, and where adherence was well documented.

        AND

        • The clinical decision has been made to treat for MDR-TB

        $Confirmed MDR-TB source cases defined as a case with intrathoracic TB with or without extrathoracic TB, with microbiological confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from any clinical specimen by either culture or molecular methods (including Xpert MTB/RIF), and with drug-resistance demonstrated by genotypic (molecular) or phenotypic methods, with any of the resistance patterns described above.

  • Albumin level greater than 2.8 g/dL within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Potassium greater than or equal to 3.4 and less than 5.6 mmol/L; magnesium greater than 0.59 mmol/L within 30 days prior to enrollment. Note: Electrolytes can be repleted and a recheck may be performed to meet eligibility criteria. The latest result should be used for eligibility determination.
  • BMI Z-score greater than -3 for children greater than or equal to 5 years of age; weight for length/height Z-score greater than -3 for children less than 5 years of age (using latest World Health Organization scores), at screening
  • Weight greater than or equal to 3 kg, at screening
  • Has initiated an appropriate optimized background regimen (OBR) MDR-TB treatment regimen as per routine treatment decision, at least two weeks but not more than eight weeks prior to enrollment, and in the opinion of the site investigator, is tolerating the regimen well at enrollment. Note: An appropriate OBR MDR-TB treatment regimen is defined as including components based on the sensitivities of the infecting isolate, if known, and past treatment history, if known. This regimen should also follow the OBR MBR-TB treatment guidelines as described in the protocol.
  • If male and engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy of the female partner: Agrees to use a barrier method of contraception (i.e. male condom) throughout the first 28 weeks on study (i.e., until four weeks after discontinuation of DLM).
  • If female and of reproductive potential, defined as having reached menarche and not having undergone a documented sterilization procedure (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or salpingectomy): Negative pregnancy test at screening within 14 days prior to enrollment.
  • If female, of reproductive potential (as defined in the protocol), and engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy: Agrees to avoid pregnancy and to use one of the following forms of birth control while receiving DLM and for one month after stopping DLM: condoms, diaphragm or cervical cap, intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal-based contraception. The selected method must be initiated prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to any nitroimidazoles or nitroimidazole derivatives
  • Active use of prohibited medications listed in the protocol, within 3 days of enrollment
  • Participant has a history of any of the following, as determined by the site investigator or designee based on parent/guardian report and available medical records:

    • A significant cardiac arrhythmia that requires medication or a history of heart disease (heart failure, coronary artery disease) that increases the risk for Torsade de Pointes
    • Significant gastrointestinal (GI), metabolic, neuropsychiatric, kidney or endocrine disease at screening that would, in the investigator's opinion, preclude safe participation in the trial and/or assessment of primary endpoints
    • Previous DLM or pretomanid exposure
    • Note: Participants can have received up to 17 days of DLM prior to enrollment
  • Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) (including QTcF [mean value of QT interval, corrected using Fredericia correction, on ECG performed in triplicate] greater than or equal to 450 ms, atrioventricular block, or prolonged QRS greater than or equal to 120 ms) at screening. Note: The value from centralized ECG read should be used to determine study eligibility.
  • Karnofsky score less than 30% for participants greater than or equal to 16 years of age or Lansky play score less than 30% for participants less than 16 years of age, at screening
  • Alcohol intake that in the opinion of the study investigator could potentially interfere with study participation and/or introduce safety concerns with use of DLM
  • Lactating with plans to breastfeed, at enrollment
  • Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) Stage 2 or 3, or osteo-articular TB at screening
  • Co-enrolled in any other trial involving pharmacologic regimens, at screening
  • If exposed to HIV and less than 2 years of age: Breastfeeding at enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1 (>=12 to < 18 years)
Participants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.

Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight.

≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to < 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to < 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); < 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)

Other Names:
  • DLM
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.
Experimental: Cohort 2 (>=6 to < 12 years)
Participants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.

Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight.

≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to < 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to < 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); < 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)

Other Names:
  • DLM
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.
Experimental: Cohort 3 (>=3 to < 6 years)
Participants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.

Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight.

≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to < 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to < 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); < 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)

Other Names:
  • DLM
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.
Experimental: Cohort 4 (>=0 to < 3 years)
Participants received delamanid (DLM) twice daily for 24 weeks. Participants also received non-study prescribed OBR for MDR-TB.

Administered orally; dosing based on participants' weight.

≥ 40 kg: 100 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 30 to < 40 kg: 50 mg twice daily (adult formulation); 15 to < 30 kg: 25 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation); < 15 kg: 15 mg twice daily (pediatric formulation)

Other Names:
  • DLM
Non-study prescribed OBR varied according to local, national, and/or international guidelines for treatment of children with MDR-TB. Administered in addition to DLM for 24 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Severity
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CIconfidence interval (CI) computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of ≥ Grade 3 Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Were Terminated From Study Treatment Due to a Drug-related Adverse Event
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Time Frame: Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits were performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted if they had QTcF ≥ 500 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 24. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 24
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Death due to all causes included. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 24
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose

PK parameter was determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model

The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study.

  • Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis
  • Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-24h) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose

PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model

The starting population PK model was developed on data from Otsuka study 232 and 233 (1). NONMEM was used when developing the final model for the population in this study.

  • Developed a population PK model as part of the final PK analysis
  • Data used in the population PK analysis included the semi-intensive PK visit (week 0, 2 and 8) and sparse PK visits (week 4, 12, 16, 24 and 28).
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Geometric Mean of Area of Maximal Concentration (Cmax) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Time of Maximal Concentration (Tmax) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Oral Clearance (Cl/F) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Volume of Distribution (Vd) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Mean Absorption Time (MAT) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DLM
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
Median Terminal Half-life (t1/2) DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose
PK parameter determined from plasma concentration-time profiles, dosing information and participant covariates using the final population PK model
Approximately day 10 (Week 2) at pre-dose, and 2, 4, and hours post dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 3 Severity Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Corrected QT Interval by Fridericia (QTcF) ≥ 500 Msec
Time Frame: Screening, Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and week 28
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits should be performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted as having an outcome if they had QTcF ≥ 500 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 28. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Screening, Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and week 28
Percentage of Participants Who Died Through Week 72 Post DLM
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Death due to all causes included. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Severity
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events ≥ Grade 2 Severity Assessed by the Core Team to be at Least Possibly Related to the Study Drug.
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
At entry and follow-up, all lab results, signs and symptoms, and diagnoses were recorded. The core team reviewed and confirmed the sites assessment of event relatedness to study drug. An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or diagnosis that occurs in a study participant during the conduct of the study REGARDLESS of the attribution. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1-5: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4= potentially life-threatening, 5=death. AE grading was per Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table V2.1). A higher grade indicates worse outcome. 95% CI computed using exact Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Count of Participants With Change in QTcF Interval From Baseline of Greater Than 60 ms
Time Frame: Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and week 28
Evaluation of the Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTcF was performed per protocol. ECGs conducted at these visits should be performed in triplicate (if possible). Consultation with the protocol cardiologist was available and encouraged for any abnormal or equivocal ECG findings and/or questions related to cardiac toxicities and assessment. Participants were counted if they had QTcF was greater than 60 msec at any study visit from entry to Week 28.
Entry, weeks 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and week 28
Percentage of Participants (Overall) With TB Treatment Outcomes
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Site investigator assessment of participant TB treatment outcomes through last study visit were entered into the eCRF. Treatment outcomes in children were defined as bacteriologic cure, probable cure, death, treatment failure, TB recurrence, and loss to follow-up as per protocol.
Measured from entry through Week 72 post DLM
Number of Participants Who Had Permanently Discontinued Study Drug Whilst on Study Due to Intolerance or Refusal to Take Medication
Time Frame: Measured from entry through Week 24
Participants were assessed for tolerability of the study drug during the study by their intolerance or refusal to take the medications
Measured from entry through Week 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Study Drug in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. The participants had the option of taking the study drug either as dispersible tablet or tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Formulation of Study Drug in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. The participants had the option of taking the study drug either as dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Dispersible Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Administration of Dispersible Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Taste of Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Frequency of Cumulative Responses to Administration of Tablet Doses in an Acceptability Assessment
Time Frame: Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Acceptability assessments were assessed by Study Staff at study visits and by Participant Caregiver whilst at home. Participants' dose formulations were not restrictive as at each visit, the participant was given the option of taking the study drug as either a dispersible tablet or tablet formulation. At a visit, the participant could have been taking a dispersible tablet and at the next visit the same participant could have been taking a tablet formulation.
Assessments conducted at weeks 2, 8 and 24
Age Effect on Bioavailability DLM
Time Frame: Approximately Week 2
Plasma concentrations are used to determine age effect on bioavailability. The age covariate describes the fold change in bioavailability for each respective age group of 0-1 year and 1-2 years, with participants aged >2 to <18 years used as the reference group. Study arms were combined for the analysis of age effect.
Approximately Week 2
Age Effect on Fraction Metabolised From Delaminid to DM-6705
Time Frame: Approximately Week 2
Plasma concentrations are used to determine age effect on bioavailability. The age covariate describes the fold change in bioavailability for each respective age group of 0-1 year and 1-2 years, with participants aged >2 to <18 years used as the reference group. Study arms were combined for the analysis of age effect.
Approximately Week 2
Dose Effect on Bioavailability DLM
Time Frame: Approximately Week 2
Plasma concentrations are used to determine dose effect on bioavailability. For doses > 50 mg the bioavailability is described by F=(dose/100)-0.66. The participants receiving the dose 100 mg are the reference group and the dose effect of doses 15-20mg, 25mg and 50mg on the bioavailability are compared to the reference group and the fold change is presented. Study arms were combined for the analysis of dose effect.
Approximately Week 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ethel Weld, MD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Study Chair: Anthony Garcia-Prats, MD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IMPAACT 2005
  • 20721 (Registry Identifier: DAIDS-ES Registry Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial (IMPAACT) Network by NIH.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

  • With whom?

    * Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the IMPAACT Network.

  • For what types of analyses?

    * To achieve aims in the proposal approved by the IMPAACT Network.

  • By what mechanism will data be made available?

    • Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the IMPAACT "Data Request" form at:

https://www.impaactnetwork.org/studies/submit-research-proposal

Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an IMPAACT Data Use Agreement before receiving the data.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Delamanid

Search Similar Trials