Decision Aid Website in Helping to Make Decisions About Fertility in Participants With Cancer

April 21, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Patient-Centered Decision Counseling for Women at Risk of Cancer-Related Infertility: Efficacy Study and Comparative-Effectiveness Randomized Trial

This trial studies how well a decision aid website works in helping to make decisions about fertility in participants with cancer. Decision aid websites that provide information about fertility preservation (maintaining your ability to have children of your own after cancer treatment) may help participants with cancer make fertility-preservation decisions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the effect of the Pathways to Fertility patient decision aid website (DA website) with women of reproductive age seen at the MD Anderson Oncofertility Service, in terms of improving patients' decisional conflict. (Part 1) II. To assess the effect of a multicomponent oncofertility decision support intervention (multicomponent DS intervention) compared to usual care with women of reproductive age at selected MD Anderson Houston Area Locations (HALs) on patients' decisional conflict. (Part 2)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess patients' decision-making process (e.g., preparation for decision making, decision self-efficacy, satisfaction) and decision quality (e.g., fertility preservation knowledge, clarity of patients' values, and congruence of preferences with the decision and/or treatment received). (Part 1) II. To assess patients' decision-making process (e.g., preparation for decision making, decision self-efficacy, satisfaction) and decision quality (e.g., fertility preservation knowledge, clarity of patients' values, and congruence of preferences with the decision about whether to accept fertility preservation referral and/or fertility preservation treatment). (Part 2)

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore the acceptability of the DA website (e.g., length, clarity, ease of use) and feasibility of the research methods (e.g., preferences for viewing at home versus at the clinic, timing of viewing, website usage, recommendations for improvement), in preparation for future planned dissemination and implementation studies. (Part 1) II. To explore the feasibility of the multicomponent DS intervention and research methods (e.g., clinician's perspectives of the educational session and referral process, website usage, rates of referrals, recommendations for improving the intervention and referral process) as delivered in the HALs oncology clinics, in preparation for future planned dissemination and implementation studies. (Part 2)

OUTLINE:

PART 1: Participants review decision aid website and complete questionnaires to help researchers learn the website's effect.

PART 2: Participants are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Participants receive standard of care including education materials about fertility preservation from the Livestrong organization and a referral for fertility preservation, if requested.

ARM II: Participants receive standard of care as in Arm I. Participants also use the decision-making the website.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
130

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed breast tumor, female genital system tumor, colorectal tumor, and/or lymphoma/myeloma
  • At risk for cancer-related infertility, as assessed by their clinician(s), including the oncofertility specialist
  • Must be able to speak, read, and write English
  • Must have internet access and a valid email address
  • Have not previously viewed the Pathways decision aid
  • For clinical provider participants: Clinical provider at a Houston Area Location of MD Anderson assigned to the intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Arm I (standard of care)
Participants receive standard of care including education materials about fertility preservation from the Livestrong organization and a referral for fertility preservation, if requested.
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other: Best Practice
Receive standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Other: Educational Intervention
Receive educational materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Experimental: Arm II (standard of care, decision-making website)
Participants receive standard of care as in Arm I. Participants also use the decision-making the website.
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other: Best Practice
Receive standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy
Other: Educational Intervention
Receive educational materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Other: Internet-Based Intervention
Use decision-making website

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' decisional conflict (Part 1)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will assess the effect of the Pathways to Fertility patient decision aid website (DA website) with women of reproductive age seen at the MD Anderson Oncofertility Service, in terms of improving patients' decisional conflict.
Up to 2 months
Patients' decisional conflict (Part 2)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will assess the effect of a multicomponent oncofertility decision support intervention (multicomponent DS intervention) compared to usual care with women of reproductive age at selected MD Anderson Houston Area Locations (HALs) on patients' decisional conflict.
Up to 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients' decision-making process (Part 1)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will assess patients' decision-making process (e.g., preparation for decision making, decision self-efficacy, satisfaction) and decision quality (e.g., fertility preservation knowledge, clarity of patients' values, and congruence of preferences with the decision and/or treatment received).
Up to 2 months
Patients' decision-making process (Part 2)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will assess patients' decision-making process (e.g., preparation for decision making, decision self-efficacy, satisfaction) and decision quality (e.g., fertility preservation knowledge, clarity of patients' values, and congruence of preferences with the decision about whether to accept fertility preservation referral and/or fertility preservation treatment).
Up to 2 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the decision aid website (Part 1)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will explore the acceptability of the DA website (e.g., length, clarity, ease of use) and feasibility of the research methods (e.g., preferences for viewing at home versus at the clinic, timing of viewing, website usage, recommendations for improvement), in preparation for future planned dissemination and implementation studies.
Up to 2 months
Feasibility of the multicomponent DS intervention and research methods (Part 2)
Time Frame: Up to 2 months
Will explore the feasibility of the multicomponent DS intervention and research methods (e.g., clinician's perspectives of the educational session and referral process, website usage, rates of referrals, recommendations for improving the intervention and referral process) as delivered in the HALs oncology clinics, in preparation for future planned dissemination and implementation studies.
Up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Terri L Woodard, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-0758 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • P30CA016672 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • UG1CA189823 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2018-01208 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings