Appropriateness of Intravenous Antibiotics Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge

June 1, 2017 updated by: Romanee Chaiwarith, Chiang Mai University

Quasi-experimental Study Comparing Intravenous Antibiotics Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge With and Without ID Consultation

A quasi-experimental study was conducted among patients receiving care at the medicine units of the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital to determine the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge with and without ID consultation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The pre-intervention period was started from November 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016 (6-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were prescribed by the primary care team. The post-intervention period was started from May 1, 2016 to February 28, 2017 (10-month period), in which the intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed and intervened by ID team.

The appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed separately by the ID fellow and ID specialist. If disagreement occurred, the feedback to the ID fellow was performed and the decision by ID specialist was used in the final analysis of appropriateness.

In post-intervention period, ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics

Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
173

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Department of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All adult patients who met the following criteria were consecutively enrolled;

  1. age≥ 15 years old and
  2. had infections at any sites and received intravenous antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria:

- They were evaluated by infectious diseases specialist for appropriate antibiotics during admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: pre-intervention period
The charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge were reviewed. Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics was assessed by ID specialists.
Experimental: post-intervention period
The intervention is the charts of patients who were prescribed intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge by the primary team were prospectively reviewed and intervened by ID team (ID specialist approval)
Procedure: ID specialist approval
Appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team was assessed by ID specialist. ID fellow modified the intravenous antibiotics ordered by the primary team if those intravenous antibiotics were judged as inappropriate by ID fellow as follows: 1) discontinue intravenous antibiotics (treatment was complete), 2) switch to oral antibiotics, 3) change intravenous antibiotics to cover isolated pathogens, 4) adjust the dose of intravenous antibiotics, and 5) change the duration of intravenous antibiotics. Finally, ID specialist retrospectively assessed the appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics at hospital discharge managed by ID fellow in post-intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of appropriateness of intravenous antibiotics prescriptions at hospital discharge between groups
Time Frame: 16 months
To calculate the number of antibiotic prescriptions at hospital discharge over the total number of prescriptions, comparing between pre-and post-intervention period.
16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The costs of antibiotics for the course of treatment
Time Frame: 16 months
To compare the cost of antibiotics for the course of treatment between the 2 periods
16 months
Clinical improvement at 1 week
Time Frame: 1 week
To calculate the number of patients who had clinical improvement at 1 week over the total number of patients in each period, comparing between the 2 periods
1 week
Readmission within 30 days, length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 30 days
To calculate the number of patients who were readmitted within 30 days over the total number of patients in each period, comparing between the 2 periods
30 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 60 days
To calculate the length of hospital stays in days between 2 periods
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chiang Mai University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Romanee Chaiwarith, MD, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3631

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anti-Infectives Adverse Reaction

Clinical Trials on ID specialist approval

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings