Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic in Bariatric Surgery Study (iLABS Study)

January 21, 2021 updated by: Dr. Tikfu Gee

Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic in Bariatric Surgery: A Double Blind-randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

Obesity is a metabolic disorder that has gradually become a prevalent public health problem and is becoming one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. The most efficacious therapy for morbid obesity today is bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery increases life expectancy by correcting the comorbidities associated with obesity, improves the quality of life, and is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. There is an increase application of laparoscopic procedures as it is considered to cause less pain than traditional open surgery, smaller incision, reduced blood loss and shorter postoperative stay, which cuts down on hospital cost. However, postoperative pain still exists causing unpleasant experience for the patient and at times causes a delayed discharge. Pain after bariatric surgery is a result of many mechanisms such as tissue injury, abdominal distention, local trauma of the stomach, chemical irritation of the peritoneum, and the pneumoperitoneum and this pain potentially can prolong hospital stay and lead to increased morbidity, and bariatric surgeons are striving to minimize the morbidity of current procedures to improve patient outcomes and this gave rise to the use of intraperitoneal local anesthetics (LA). It was found that the use of intraperitoneal LA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe, and it results in a statistically significant reduction in early postoperative abdominal pain. Many studies were done to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal LA in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gynecologic procedures and appendectomy but to date there are limited studies done to evaluate the role of intraperitoneal LA in bariatric surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraperitoneal instillation of local ropivacaine on postoperative abdominal pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We hypothesized that the administration of intraperitoneal instillation of local ropivacaine would help reduce postoperative pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Recruitment will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study in patients age 18 and above going for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The study will involve two groups with equal allocation of patients in the test group (local anaesthesia) and control group (normal saline) by randomization. All patient will need to be evaluated by our multidisciplinary team before randomization. Each patient going for an elective LSG will be informed regarding this research study, and the final decision will solely be made based on patients' willingness. All patients who agree to participate in this study will be randomized into one of the study groups. The patients will also be made aware that this is an experimental trial and both verbal and written informed consent will be taken before treatment. In addition, the patients will be informed regarding the use of the clinical and analytical data for publication purposes.

Patients will not be given access to the study data however they will be informed regarding their progress during every follow-up visit. All research data will be kept in our hard disk as well as our web-based storage (i-cloud and i-drive) for two years. Study data will be held even after the study period as there will still be a continuous follow-up with the patients for life. However, all patients' information obtained from this study will be kept and handled in a confidential manner, by applicable laws and regulations. When publishing or presenting the study results, the identity of patients will not be revealed without patient's expressed consent. Participants will also be covered under clinical trial insurance from the institution during the study period. In the case of emergency, all patients will be given the contact number of the investigator as the investigator are contactable throughout the day. This study will begin after receiving the approval of Medical Research & Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia.

Computer generated randomization will be done using Interactive Web Response Technology. There will be equal chances for patients to be assigned to either one of the study groups. The result of the randomization will be kept in envelopes and viewed by the research assistant who did not otherwise participate in this study, were unknown to the investigators and the patients, and the answer will be contained in a set of sealed envelopes. After admitting the patient into the operating room and just before the surgery was done, the numbered envelope will be opened by the operating theater nurse and the card inside determined which group the patient would be placed. The operating theater nurse will then prepare either 20mL of 150mg ropivacaine in 180mL normal saline (for test group) or 200mL normal saline (for control group) using a standard syringe and the syringe will be given to the surgeon who then injects the solution through a catheter along the greater curvature and left subdiaphragmatic region of the stomach. The general anesthetic used for all patients will be a combination of 1gm IV Paracetamol, 40mg IV Parecoxib and IV Fentamyl prepared according to patient's adjusted body weight.

Patients will need to be admitted to the hospital one day before the scheduled surgery date. Participating patients that are allergic to local anesthetic ropivacaine will be excluded from this study. However, if patients have allergy due to the medication after surgery, anti-allergic medication will be administered to the patients upon investigation. After the surgery, the medical doctors or nurses in the ward that is not otherwise involved in this research will assess and record the pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). A score of 0 means no pain, whereas a score of 10 equals the worst pain ever experienced. Post-operative pain will be rated on a VAS at rest and cough. The time of arrival in the postoperative recovery room will be defined as zero hours postoperatively. The patients will be asked about the location of pain, whether at the shoulder, incision sites, and/or inside the abdomen by the medical doctors or nurses. The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated at two, four, six, eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. The analgesic requirement during the 48 hours after the surgery will also be noted by the medical doctor or nurses in the ward. The duration of patients' participation in the study will only be for two days postoperative. However, patients still need to come for follow-up after surgery. The standard follow-up includes a visit to the outpatient clinic at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks after surgery, then 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months and after that, a life-long annual visit. Adverse events (eg. post-operative bleeding and stapler leak) will be monitored closely at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after surgery. In any occurrence of an adverse event, it will be documented and reported within 14 days.

Sample Size Estimation The sample size was estimated with the help of PS software (power and sample size calculation software) 3.0.43 with a power of 80% and a significant level of 0.05. The estimation was based on Visual Analog Score (VAS) with assuming 50% of difference in mean postoperative pain score. The total estimated sample size is 22 patients in each arm for our study. However, with the inclusion of 20% drop out rate, the total number of patients needed for this study is 27 patients in each arm.

Data Analysis Statistical calculations will be performed using the standard statistical software package, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. All data will be expressed as mean values and standard deviation, with the exception of rescue analgesic treatment and the occurrence of shoulder tip pain that will be in percentages (%). Median and interquartile range (IQR) will be calculated for all not normally distributed continuous variables. Non-parametric tests such as Mann-Whitney U test and/orKruskall-Wallis test will be used for non-normal distribution of variables. Associations between qualitative variables will be determined by Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and SAS Exact Contingency Table. In all statistical analyses, p-value of < 0.05 (95% confidence interval) was considered to be statistically significant.

Study Ethics Ethical clearance will be obtained from the Medical Research Ethic Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia and Kuala Lumpur General Hospital. This study will be submitted for National Medical Research Register (NMRR). Respondent consent will be obtained from each participant of study.

Conflict of Interest There is no conflict of interest among the investigators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia, 43400
        • Hospital Serdang
    • Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
      • Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50586
        • Hospital Kuala Lumpur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

i. Patients age 18 years and above ii. Patients who can communicate in English or Malay iii. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy iv. Able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

i. Patients age below 18 years ii. Patients are allergic to ropivacaine or local anaesthetic iii. Inability to informed consent iv. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification > 3 v. Patients with chronic medical diseases (eg. Ischaemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac failure) and chronic opioid treatment vi. Patients with previous foregut surgery including esophageal, gastric, liver, and pancreas resections

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test group
Patients will undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with ropivacaine diluted in normal saline injected along the stomach region at the end of the surgical procedure.
Patient undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will receive 20mL of 150mg ropivacaine (0.75%) diluted in 180mL normal saline to be injected through a catheter along the greater curvature and left subdiaphragmatic region of the stomach at the end of the surgical procedure. After the surgery, the medical doctors or nurses in the ward that is not otherwise involved in this research will assess and record the pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated at two, four, six, eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
Other Names:
  • Test group
Experimental: Control group
Patients will undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with only normal saline injected along the stomach region at the end of the surgical procedure.
Patient undergo elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will receive 200mL normal saline to be injected through a catheter along the greater curvature and left subdiaphragmatic region of the stomach at the end of the surgical procedure. After the surgery, the medical doctors or nurses in the ward that is not otherwise involved in this research will assess and record the pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10). The abdomen and shoulder tip pain intensity will be rated at two, four, six, eight, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively.
Other Names:
  • Control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 2 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
2 hours after surgery
4 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 4 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
4 hours after surgery
6 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
6 hours after surgery
8 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 8 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
8 hours after surgery
24 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
24 hours after surgery
48 hours postoperative pain at rest
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 2 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
2 hours after surgery
4 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 4 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
4 hours after surgery
6 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
6 hours after surgery
8 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 8 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
8 hours after surgery
24 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
24 hours after surgery
48 hours postoperative pain at cough
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Measured by visual analogue pain scale
48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lim Shu Yu, MS, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NMRR-17-284-33857

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bariatric Surgery Candidate

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Search Similar Trials