Safety and Feasibility of Electrical Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (SAFE-SVC)

June 15, 2017 updated by: Ettore Sansavini Health Science Foundation

Safety and Feasibility of Electrical Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using the Cryoballoon: the SAFE-SVC Study.

The present study is designed as a observational prospective, multicentre, international. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SVC isolation with the CB in a prospective manner.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Consecutive patients programmed for cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for PAF will be prospectively enrolled in our study. After PVI is obtained and proven by entrance- and exit block, the SVC will be mapped for potentials. If the SVC exhibits electrical activity, isolation will be attempted performing a single maximum 180 seconds balloon application. A single 180 seconds application is known to produce a durable lesion. Performing a combined approach (PVI together with SVC isolation) using the same cryoballoon requires no additional vascular access. Therefore no significant raise in complications is to be expected. During a second generation CBA the described rate of complications is to be estimated around 2%. Transient phrenic nerve palsy in 7.2 %, but reversible in virtually all patients within the end of the procedure.

To prevent nervous injury the phrenic nerve (PN) will be tested during ablation of the SVC, in the same fashion as performed systematically during ablation of the right sided pulmonary veins.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Saverio Iacopino, MD
  • Phone Number: +390545217228
  • Email: iacopino@iol.it

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Not yet recruiting
        • UZ Brussel VUB
        • Contact:
          • GianBattista Chierchia, MD,PhD
  • Italy
    • Ravenna
      • Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy, 48033
        • Recruiting
        • Maria Cecilia Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Saverio Iacopino, MD
  • Netherlands
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Radboud University
        • Contact:
          • Sjoerd Westra, MD
  • Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Novosibirsk University
        • Contact:
          • Alexander Romanov, MD,PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients programmed for cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for PAF

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent
  2. Consecutive patients programmed for cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for PAF will be prospectively enrolled in our study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age younger than 18 years
  2. Severe valve disease (MI or AI > ¾)
  3. Uncontrolled heart failure,
  4. Contraindication to general anaesthesia/ deep procedural sedation
  5. Left atrial thrombus at the pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SVC isolation using a dedicated cryoballoon device
Time Frame: During procedure
feasibility and safety of superior vena cava (SVC) isolation added to standard pulmonary vein isolation using the cryoballoon in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
During procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical outcame
Time Frame: 12 months
Clinical outcome in terms of freedom from atrial fibrillation following ablation.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically relevant abnormalities
Time Frame: 12 months
Detection of clinically relevant abnormalities on physical examinations, vital signs, 2D echocardio, 12 lead ECG, and laboratory routine tests.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ettore Sansavini Health Science Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Saverio Iacopino, MD, Maria Cecilia Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ESREFO 31

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on SVC isolation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings