Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With LUTS

September 3, 2021 updated by: Rose Khavari, M.D., The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

The Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure using a device that improves motor symptoms of specific neurological and movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease or Essential Tremor. As part of the patient's care, the DBS is implanted when symptoms cannot be satisfactorily controlled with medications or conventional therapies. Lower urinary tract symptoms are common in patients who have underlying neurological or movement disorders and control over lower urinary tract function is poorly understood. In this study investigators are evaluating the effects of DBS on lower urinary tract function.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that improves motor symptoms of specific neurological and movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease or Essential Tremor. DBS is implanted when symptoms cannot be satisfactorily controlled with medications or conventional therapies. After insertion of deep electrodes, electrical stimulation will be delivered to modulate specific neurons in certain areas of the brain. Despite, the known motor effects for DBS, its nonmotor effects on other organs such as the urinary tract and bladder function remains unclear. Lower urinary tract symptoms such as frequency, urgency, urinary incontinence, or incomplete bladder emptying are common in patients who have underlying neurological or movement disorders. In addition, central neural control over lower urinary tract function is still poorly understand. In this trial investigators plan to evaluate the effects of Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) on lower urinary tract function. This trial is designed to test the hypothesis that DBS improves objective and subjective symptoms of lower urinary tract function in specific patient populations. The investigators plan to test this hypothesis by using validated patient reported outcome questionnaires and urodynamic testing (both are part of routine care for neurogenic bladder) before and after DBS implantation. In addition, this trial will shed some light in understanding higher neural control of bladder and potentially identify target areas for future intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are a candidate for therapeutic DBS because of their neurologic symptoms and have a total AUASS of ≥8.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are a candidate for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) as standard care for neurologic symptoms and have a moderate or greater urinary bother American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS≥8)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, breastfeeding mothers and all individuals younger than 18 years of age will be excluded. Patients with history of urinary diversion or augmentation cystoplasty will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in AUASS (American Urological Association Symptom Score)
Time Frame: Change in AUA symptoms score at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) measurement compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) measurement.
Subjective assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) effect on urinary symptoms measured by AUASS questionnaire (from none= 0 to most severe=35)
Change in AUA symptoms score at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) measurement compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) measurement.
Change from Baseline in I-QOL (Incontinence Quality of Life score)
Time Frame: Change in I-QOL score at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) measurement compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) measurement.
Subjective assessment of DBS effect on urinary incontinence related QOL measured by I-QOL questionnaire. Scores would be from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate less impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life
Change in I-QOL score at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) measurement compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) measurement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO)
Time Frame: Change in Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity pattern at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) urodynamic study compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) urodynamic study.
Using Urodynamic Study (UDS) to objectively assess DBS effect on Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity (NDO) (Changed status from Yes to No- Yes means we see NDO at time of UDS , No means we do not see NDO at the time of UDS and we check to see if this status changes from Yes in Pre-DBS study to No in Post DBS and year 2 follow-up study ) and Bladder Compliance which is measured by diving bladder volume change to bladder pressure change (ml/cmH2O) during bladder filling at the time of UDS.
Change in Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity pattern at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) urodynamic study compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) urodynamic study.
Change from baseline in Bladder Compliance
Time Frame: Change in bladder compliance at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) urodynamic study compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) urodynamic study.
Bladder Compliance is measured by dividing bladder volume change to bladder pressure change (ml/cmH2O) during bladder filling at the time of UDS. Bladder Compliance= ( Bladder Volume at the end of bladder filling- Bladder Volume at the beginning of bladder filling)/ Bladder Pressure at the end of bladder filling- Bladder Pressure at the beginning of bladder filling)
Change in bladder compliance at Post DBS Implant (≥ 60 days after procedure) urodynamic study compared to Pre-DBS (≤60 day prior to procedure) urodynamic study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 25, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00016473

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

To be determined

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurogenic Bladder

Clinical Trials on It's is a cohort

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings