The Effect of OrthoPulse Photobiomodulation on the Rate of Tooth Movement During Alignment With Fixed Appliances
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Chandler, Arizona, United States, 85224
- Dickerson Orthodontics
-
Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85382
- Dickerson Orthodontics
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85028
- Dickerson Orthodontics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of permanent dentition
- Eligible and scheduled for full-mouth, fixed-appliance orthodontic treatment
- Moderate to severe crowding (LII ≥ 3 mm), with no labio-lingually displaced teeth
- Class I or Class II malocclusion by ½ cusp or less
- Non-extraction in both arches
- Age 11-60
- Good oral hygiene
- Non-smoker; non-use of chewing tobacco
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject is currently enrolled in another clinical study
- Subject decided on Invisalign rather than braces
- Periodontally involved teeth
- Use of bisphosphonates (osteoporosis drugs) during the study
- Subject plans to relocate over the treatment period
- Spaces between anterior teeth
- Subject has dental implants or an implanted prosthesis
- Sponsor employees, the Investigator and staff, as well as their immediate family members
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 1 (Control)
Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment only
|
Patients receive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment by the qualified Principal Investigator (PI).
Treatment and follow-up appointments per the traditional practices of the PI and dental office.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 2 (OP1)
Subjects assigned to this group receive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment in conjunction with receiving daily OrthoPulse™ treatments.
|
Patients carry out daily OrthoPulse™ treatments at home.
Patients receive fixed appliance orthodontic treatment by the qualified Principal Investigator (PI).
Treatment and follow-up appointments per the traditional practices of the PI and dental office.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of tooth movement in OrthoPulse treated and non-OrthoPulse treated patients
Time Frame: From start of treatment until Little's Irregularity Index (LII) reaches less than approximately 2 mm but greater than 0 mm, no more than 6 months after the start of treatment.
|
Rate of tooth movement will be evaluated based on the duration of time and amount of tooth movement required to reach Little's Irregularity Index (LII) of less than approximately 2 mm but greater than 0 mm, as determined by the qualified investigator.
|
From start of treatment until Little's Irregularity Index (LII) reaches less than approximately 2 mm but greater than 0 mm, no more than 6 months after the start of treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effect of OrthoPulse PBM on external apical root resorption (EARR)
Time Frame: 6 months after the start of orthodontic treatment
|
Root lengths from patients will be measured using panoramic radiographs at the start of treatment and 6 months after the start of treatment.
These measurements will be used to determine and compare EARR between each of the two groups.
|
6 months after the start of orthodontic treatment
|
|
Risk of OrthoPulse PBM to the patient.
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case
|
Patients from both groups will be questioned and assessed at regularly scheduled visits for treatment-related adverse events.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of their orthodontic treatment, an expected average of 1-2 years, depending on the severity of the case
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Whelan HT, Smits RL Jr, Buchman EV, Whelan NT, Turner SG, Margolis DA, Cevenini V, Stinson H, Ignatius R, Martin T, Cwiklinski J, Philippi AF, Graf WR, Hodgson B, Gould L, Kane M, Chen G, Caviness J. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Dec;19(6):305-14. doi: 10.1089/104454701753342758.
- Nimeri G, Kau CH, Corona R, Shelly J. The effect of photobiomodulation on root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2014 Jan 15;6:1-8. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S49489. eCollection 2014.
- Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Akkus D. Effect of LED-mediated-photobiomodulation therapy on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):779-85. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1405-3. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
- El-Bialy T, Alhadlaq A, Felemban N, Yeung J, Ebrahim A, Hassan AH. The effect of light-emitting diode and laser on mandibular growth in rats. Angle Orthod. 2015 Mar;85(2):233-8. doi: 10.2319/030914-170.1. Epub 2014 Jul 14. Erratum In: Angle Orthod. 2016 Jan;86(1):177.
- Uysal T, Ekizer A, Akcay H, Etoz O, Guray E. Resonance frequency analysis of orthodontic miniscrews subjected to light-emitting diode photobiomodulation therapy. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):44-51. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq166. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
- Ekizer A, Uysal T, Guray E, Yuksel Y. Light-emitting diode photobiomodulation: effect on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats--early bone changes. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Sep;28(5):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1214-0. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
- Kau CH, Kantarci A, Shaughnessy T, Vachiramon A, Santiwong P, de la Fuente A, Skrenes D, Ma D, Brawn P. Photobiomodulation accelerates orthodontic alignment in the early phase of treatment. Prog Orthod. 2013 Sep 19;14:30. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-30.
- Dias FJ, Issa JP, Vicentini FT, Fonseca MJ, Leao JC, Siessere S, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the oxidative metabolism and matrix proteins in the rat masseter muscle. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Oct;29(10):677-84. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2879. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
- Silveira PC, Silva LA, Fraga DB, Freitas TP, Streck EL, Pinho R. Evaluation of mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in muscle healing by low-level laser therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2009 May 4;95(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
- Cruz DR, Kohara EK, Ribeiro MS, Wetter NU. Effects of low-intensity laser therapy on the orthodontic movement velocity of human teeth: a preliminary study. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;35(2):117-20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20076.
- Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2008 Jan;23(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0449-7. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
- Sousa MV, Scanavini MA, Sannomiya EK, Velasco LG, Angelieri F. Influence of low-level laser on the speed of orthodontic movement. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Mar;29(3):191-6. doi: 10.1089/pho.2009.2652. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
- Weber JB, Pinheiro AL, de Oliveira MG, Oliveira FA, Ramalho LM. Laser therapy improves healing of bone defects submitted to autologous bone graft. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Feb;24(1):38-44. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.38.
- Saito S, Shimizu N. Stimulatory effects of low-power laser irradiation on bone regeneration in midpalatal suture during expansion in the rat. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):525-32. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70152-5.
- Masha RT, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm stimulates transcription of genes involved in the electron transport chain. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Feb;31(2):47-53. doi: 10.1089/pho.2012.3369. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
- Oron U, Ilic S, De Taboada L, Streeter J. Ga-As (808 nm) laser irradiation enhances ATP production in human neuronal cells in culture. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Jun;25(3):180-2. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2064.
- Sun X, Zhu X, Xu C, Ye N, Zhu H. [Effects of low energy laser on tooth movement and remodeling of alveolar bone in rabbits]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Oct;19(5):290-3. Chinese.
- Doshi-Mehta G, Bhad-Patil WA. Efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy in reducing treatment time and orthodontic pain: a clinical investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Mar;141(3):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.09.009.
- Yamaguchi M, Hayashi M, Fujita S, Yoshida T, Utsunomiya T, Yamamoto H, Kasai K. Low-energy laser irradiation facilitates the velocity of tooth movement and the expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-9, cathepsin K, and alpha(v) beta(3) integrin in rats. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr;32(2):131-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp078. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
- Shaughnessy T, Kantarci A, Kau CH, Skrenes D, Skrenes S, Ma D. Intraoral photobiomodulation-induced orthodontic tooth alignment: a preliminary study. BMC Oral Health. 2016 Jan 13;16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0159-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BX11
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
NCT07162753RecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07466641RecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I Malocclusion
-
NCT07404696Not yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | Overjet
-
NCT07383259Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07179354CompletedClass III Skeletal Malocclusion
-
NCT07243509CompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION
-
NCT04376190Completed
-
NCT07405905Recruiting
-
NCT06631131CompletedClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
-
NCT04972084Completed3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1
Clinical Trials on OrthoPulse™
-
NCT02267850Completed
-
NCT02267837Completed
-
NCT02267811Completed
-
NCT02267824Completed
-
NCT02954133Unknown
-
NCT01386905Completed
-
NCT02810626UnknownBrain Damage, Chronic | Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome | Cerebellar Mutism