The Enzymatic Activity of Lymphocyte Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase DPD in the Blood as a Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Digestive Cancer in the First or Second Metastatic Line (DPD DIG)

July 1, 2021 updated by: Centre Antoine Lacassagne
An observational study of a prospective, analytical, monocentric cohort which does not modify the patient care because the phenotyping of the dihydropyrimidine déshydrogénase DPD (lymphocyte activity) is already carried out in routine hospital. The analysis will be based on clinical, radiological and biological criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Used for nearly sixty years, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the oldest drug prescribed in the treatment of digestive cancers and, still today, the most prescribed drug in digestive cancer. 5-FU belongs to the class of anti-metabolites. There is an oral precursor of 5-FU which is currently available and used in digestive cancer: Xeloda® (capecitabine).

The problem is that fluoropyrimidines are 80% metabolised to 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH2) by a key enzyme: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). There is inter-individual variability in the activity of this enzyme, partly related to genetic factors [1]. An abundant literature has already shown that a decrease in the activity of this enzyme results in an increase in the half-life of 5-FU. Thus, patients with a deficit in DPD activity have a risk of overexposure to chemotherapy in this class, and consequently an increased risk of acute, early and severe toxicity.

Since the 1990th years, many authors have shown that there is considerable inter-individual variability in the plasma concentration of 5 FU after bolus [5] or continuous infusion [6]. These variations in plasma concentrations of 5FU are probably related to a 5-FU catabolism variability related to the activity of DPD.

It has also been shown that there is a correlation between 5FU plasma level, tumor response and toxicity [7, 8]. A Phase III study showed that there was a significant impact on the response rate (33.7% VS 18.3%) p = 0.004 if doses of 5-FU were adjusted to plasma levels of 5-FU versus body surface [9]. Median survival was 16 months in the control arm versus 22 months in the experimental arm (P = 0.08), with severe grade 3-4 toxicities statistically increased in the control arm (p = 0.03). An adaptation of doses of 5-FU to the body surface, as it is done today, is in conclusion insufficient to obtain reproducible plasma concentrations due to an interindividual variability of the metabolism, linked to the activity of the DPD .

These data suggest that DPD activity, by modulating plasma concentration, may be a predictive factor of fluoropyrimidine response and also a prognostic factor. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have demonstrated a direct link between DPD activity, tumor response, and survival impact. Recently, Chamorey and al. [10] showed that the high level of DPD enzyme activity (> 0.30 nmol / min / mg protein) was significantly correlated with lower overall survival and progression-free survival. This was a retrospective analysis of 130 patients treated with fluoropyrimidines regardless of the tumor primitive (digestive, breast, ENT).

These results, presented in spite of their significance, are the result of a retrospective study that is subject, as a minimum, to selection bias. It therefore seemed important to make a prospective study, centered on digestive cancers. The prospective nature will limit selection bias and restriction to digestive cancers in which fluoropyrimidines have a main function and limit confunding biases. The selection of the first and second lines of palliative chemotherapy will increase the population studied and thus the power of the statistical analysis.

If the initial results were confirmed, this will allow DPD to be approached from a new angle and will encourage multicenter controlled prospective studies with the Antoine-Lacassagne center as the national promotor.

In our study, we decided to evaluate DPD activity using an enzymatic radio technique that directly evaluates the activity of the enzyme in blood lymphocytes, which is the original technique and the oldest.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric FRANCOIS, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Metastatic or locally-advanced digestive cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be > or = to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent
  • ECOG 0 to 2,
  • Patient with digestive cancer, all histologic type,
  • Patient who will receive a metastatic or locally-advanced first or second line treatment by 5-FU or capecitabine,
  • Patient with measurable lesions based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
  • Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial,
  • Health care insurance available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Be < to 18 of age on day of signing informed consent,
  • Patient without measurable lesion based on RECIST 1.1 criteria,
  • ECOG > 2,
  • Patients refusing to participate in the study or unable to give an oral consent,
  • Contraindication of 5-FU or capecitabine treatment,
  • People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
normal DPD result group
patients group with a normal DPD result
lymphocyte DPD dosage in peripheral blood
elevated DPD result group
patients group with an elevated DPD result
lymphocyte DPD dosage in peripheral blood

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression free survival
Time Frame: june 2019
progression free survival calculated between diagnosis date and progression date or death date
june 2019

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: june 2019
overall survival calculated between diagnosis date and lastest news date or death
june 2019
treatment response
Time Frame: june 2019
treatment response defined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria
june 2019
toxicities evaluation
Time Frame: june 2019
toxicities evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0
june 2019

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 29, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/25

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic or Locally-advanced Digestive Cancer

Clinical Trials on lymphocyte DPD dosage

Search Similar Trials