Patient Satisfaction and Bone Changes for OT Cap and OT Vertical Attachment

July 17, 2017 updated by: Ahmed Mohamed Ali Hassaan, Cairo University

Patient Satisfaction and Bone Changes in Bilateral Distal Extension Case Using OT Cap Versus OT Vertical Attachment "Randomized Clinical Trial"

The purpose of this study aimed to answer a clinical question whether In a patient with bilateral distal extension area, would the metal framework partial denture with OT vertical attachment versus partial denture with OT CAP attachment result in better patient satisfaction?

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Yusr Mady

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients age ranged between 35-45years old.
  • All patients have Kennedy class I partially edentulous mandibular arch in which the last remaining teeth were the second premolars bilaterally.
  • The abutment teeth had an apparently good periodontal condition with no signs of mobility or inflammation with firm and healthy mucosa.
  • Edentulous ridge covered by health firm mucoperiosteum, without abnormal bony irregularity or severe lingual undercuts.
  • Patients with normal relationship of maxilla and mandible (Angle class I ridge classification) and sufficient inter-arch space (6mm) the size of the attachment
  • The opposing dentition is intact arch with no noticeable over eruption or tilting or restored with acceptable fixed restoration.
  • All patients are free from neurological, muscular disorders and tempro-mandibular joint disorders.
  • Only patients who can be easily motivated to achieve and maintain good oral

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with limited skills
  • Un co-operative patients.
  • patient with bad oral hygiene

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OT Vertical attachment
The attachment consists of a male part that is in the form of a steady with a central hole. This part is attached to the abutments .the female component is a white standard retentive clip engaging the outer walls of a steady male. It is incorporated in the partial denture together with a castable balancing pin that fits into the central hole of the steady male and aids in centering the prosthesis during the final stage of insertion; thereby ensuring a longer life to the retentive clips.
new extra coronal castable attachment
Other Names:
  • Castable twin cylinder attachment
Active Comparator: OT Cap attachment
Beveled castable bar with micro-size sphere located in first molar region, and attached to the distal surface of the waxed crowns to be cast as one piece, Nylone caps of standard retention for micro size sphere this nylon caps fit onto their spheres and located in metal housing at fitting surface on the denture and Positioning rings to maintain the space for nylon cap during construction of the partial denture metal framework.
standard extra coronal attachment
Other Names:
  • extra coronal castable attachment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction assessed using questionnaire
Time Frame: 9 months
Questionnaire for patient satisfaction
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bone height
Time Frame: 9 months
radio graphically by digora
9 months
bone density
Time Frame: 9 months
radio graphically by digora
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OT Cap_OT Vertical

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on OT Vertical attachment

Search Similar Trials