Pain Study to Assess Local Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of CTY-5339 on Gingival Mucosal Tissue in Normal Volunteers

August 20, 2019 updated by: Cetylite Industries

A Double-blind, Cross-over, Incomplete Factorial Study to Assess the Local Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray (CTY-5339A) When Applied to the Gingival Mucosal Tissue in Normal Volunteers

The purpose of this study is to determine if the topical application to gingival tissue of the combination of benzocaine and tetracaine has a longer duration of local anesthetic activity than benzocaine alone.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In a blinded study, either benzocaine alone or the combination of benzocaine and tetracaine will be sprayed onto the gingival mucosal tissue. Onset and duration of local anesthesia will be evaluated over a one hour period using pin prick and quantitative sensory testing of heat (QST-heat) stimulation. Subjects will receive both treatments in a cross-over design with each session separated by 4-14 days. A total of 50 subjects (normal volunteers) will be evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania, School of Dental Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects between 18-75 years of age with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤32;
  • Subjects are category I or II on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA category I or II) and are in normal physical health as judged by physical and laboratory examinations;
  • Subjects have normal appearance of the oral mucosal tissues;
  • At screening and at Baseline during Stage 1 and Sessions 1 and 2, of Stage 2 subjects with Pin-Prick-Test (PPT) scores of at least "3" (on a 10 point numerical rating scale [NRS]) on the 2 readings, 1 of which must be a score of at least "4";
  • Subjects have mean quantitative sensory test of heat (QST-Heat) pain sensation temperature assessments on the gingival mucosa of 46.5 °C or less based on the average of the 2 readings at screening and at the Baseline Study Sessions for Stages 1 and 2;
  • Subjects must agree to refrain from ingesting any systemic or topical analgesic medication for 3 days or 5 half-lives of the drug prior to and during the study period and alcohol for 1 day prior to and during the study period;
  • Subjects must agree to refrain from using mouth rinses, cough drops or throat lozenges on the day of each test session;
  • Female subjects must be physically incapable of childbearing potential (postmenopausal for more than 1 year or surgically sterile) or practicing an acceptable method of contraception (hormonal, barrier with spermicide, intrauterine device, vasectomized or same sex partner, or abstinence). Subjects using hormonal birth control must have been on a stable dose of treatment for at least 30 days and received at least 1 cycle of treatment prior to randomization. At Screening and at Baseline of both sessions, all females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test and not be breastfeeding;
  • Negative urine drug screen for drugs of abuse at Screening and at Baseline for each Study Session. A positive drug screen result may be permitted if the subject has been on a stable dose of an allowed medication for >30 days;
  • Subjects must be capable of reading, comprehending, and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a history of any significant hepatic, renal, endocrine, cardiac, neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, hematologic, or metabolic disorders, including glaucoma, diabetes, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis;
  • Subjects with a history of any type of cancer other than skin related cancers;
  • Subjects with conditions that affect the absorption, metabolism, or passage of drugs out of the body, (e.g., sprue, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, colitis, or liver, kidney, or thyroid conditions);
  • Subjects with any history of alcohol or substance abuse (including a positive drug screen test);
  • Subjects that currently have or have a history of uncontrolled hypertension;
  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to any local anesthetic drug;
  • Subjects with a hematocrit level significantly below the normal range on the screening laboratory examination (as judged by the PI);
  • Subjects with any clinically significant abnormal lab result (as judged by the PI);
  • Subjects with any condition or history felt by the Investigator to place the subject at increased risk;
  • Subjects who have smoked or chewed tobacco-containing substances within 6 months prior to the start of the study;
  • Subjects judged by the Investigator to be unable or unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol;
  • Subjects who have used an investigational drug within 30 days prior to entering the study;
  • Subjects who have donated blood within 3 months prior to the start of the study;
  • Subjects who have previously participated in the trial;
  • Subjects who are members of the study site staff directly involved with the study or a relative of the Sponsor or other personnel involved with the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Stage II: One spray CTY-5339-A, then one spray CTY-5339-CB
A single spray of CTY-5339-A Anesthetic Spray (14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine HCl) tested over a 60 minute session, followed by a 4-14 day washout period, followed by a single spray of CTY-5339-CB Anesthetic Spray (14.0% benzocaine) tested over a 60 minute session. Used in Stage II of the study only.
Combination product: One spray CTY-5339-A
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredients: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg) and 2.0% Tetracaine Hydrochloride (USP = 4 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • CTY-5339-A
  • CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray
  • benzocaine
  • tetracaine
  • tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 2.0% tetracaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine
  • benzocaine and tetracaine HCl
  • benzocaine and tetracaine
Device: One spray CTY-5339-CB
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredient: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • benzocaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • CTY-5339-CB
Active Comparator: Stage II: One spray of CTY-5339-CB, then one spray CTY-5339-A
A single spray of CTY-5339-CB Anesthetic Spray (14.0% benzocaine) tested over a 60 minute session, followed by a 4-14 day washout period, followed by a single spray of CTY-5339-A Anesthetic Spray (14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine HCl) tested over a 60 minute session. Used in Stage II of the study only.
Combination product: One spray CTY-5339-A
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredients: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg) and 2.0% Tetracaine Hydrochloride (USP = 4 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • CTY-5339-A
  • CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray
  • benzocaine
  • tetracaine
  • tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 2.0% tetracaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine
  • benzocaine and tetracaine HCl
  • benzocaine and tetracaine
Device: One spray CTY-5339-CB
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredient: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • benzocaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • CTY-5339-CB
Experimental: Stage I: One spray CTY-5339-A
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredients: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg) and 2.0% Tetracaine Hydrochloride (USP = 4 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray. Tested over a 60 minute session. Used in Stage I of the study only.
Combination product: One spray CTY-5339-A
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredients: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg) and 2.0% Tetracaine Hydrochloride (USP = 4 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • CTY-5339-A
  • CTY-5339 Anesthetic Spray
  • benzocaine
  • tetracaine
  • tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 2.0% tetracaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine HCl
  • 14.0% benzocaine and 2.0% tetracaine
  • benzocaine and tetracaine HCl
  • benzocaine and tetracaine
Active Comparator: Stage I: One spray CTY-5339-CB
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredient: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray. Tested over a 60 minute session. Used in Stage I of the study only.
Device: One spray CTY-5339-CB
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains the active ingredient: 14.0% Benzocaine (USP = 28 mg). Administered in a single anesthetic spray.
Other Names:
  • benzocaine
  • 14.0% benzocaine
  • CTY-5339-CB
Placebo Comparator: Stage I: One spray CTY-5339-P
Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains no active ingredient (placebo: vehicle control). Administered in a single anesthetic spray. Tested over a 60 minute session. Used in Stage I of the study only.
Device: One spray CTY-5339-P
Placebo. Metered spray bottle with ≈200 uL total spray volume. Contains no active ingredient (vehicle control).
Other Names:
  • placebo
  • CTY-5339-P
  • vehicle control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stage II: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Pin Prick Test (PPT) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application
The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based "Duration of effect" was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Pin Prick Test (PPT) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-P (Placebo: Vehicle Control)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

The duration of effect, was defined as the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia.Onset was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than Baseline. Absence of anesthesia was defined as follows: After Onset had been established, absence was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression of absence of analgesia. Reports of less pain by ≥1 unit than Baseline indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (< 1 unit) or more pain than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. The minimum onset time was 1 minute. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Duration of Anesthesia as Measured by Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) for One Spray CTY-5339-A Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-CB Compared to One Spray CTY-5339-P (Placebo: Vehicle Control)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application
The duration of effect, was defined as the time from onset to treatment failure, as measured by QST Heat score. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. The QST Heat-based "Duration of effect" was calculated by the length of time in minutes from onset of anesthesia to the absence of anesthesia where Onset of anesthesia was defined by PPT unless specific QST thresholds were not met. After Onset had been established, absence of analgesia or offset was the first of two time points with consecutive occurrences of regression or absence of analgesia. Reports of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST indicated analgesia; while a report of similar (<3 °C) than Baseline indicated regression or absence of analgesia. Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stage II: Onset of Anesthesia for Pin Prick Test (PPT)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Onset of Anesthesia for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.

  • If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.
  • If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.
  • If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.

QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Percentage of Responders for Pin Prick Test (PPT) at Each Time Point
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Percentage of Responders for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) at Each Time Point
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST.

QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Minimal Pain on Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Any time within one hour post-application

Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Any time within one hour post-application
Stage II: Duration of Minimal Pain for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Maximum Heat for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)
Time Frame: Any time within one hour post-application

QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.

Stage II outcome.
Any time within one hour post-application
Stage II: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (Post-hoc)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage II: Sum of Temperature Differences (STID) for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) (Post-hoc)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).

Stage II outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Percentage of Responders for Pin Prick Test (PPT) at Each Time Point
Time Frame: Time of application up to one hour post-application

Response at at time point is defined as when the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Time of application up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Percentage of Responders for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) at Each Time Point
Time Frame: Time of application up to one hour post-application

Response at a time point is defined as an increase of QST heat pain temperature by ≥ 3 degrees C compared to the Baseline QST. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Time of application up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Duration of Minimal Pain for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Response at a time point is defined as having the PPT average pain score of ≤2. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Maximum Heat for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)
Time Frame: Any time within one hour post-application

QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point. Reaching maximum heat for QST Heat was defined as subjects reaching the maximum temperature without reporting pain at one or more time points.

Stage I outcome.
Any time within one hour post-application
Stage I: Onset of Anesthesia for Pin Prick Test (PPT)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Onset of anesthesia was the time point at which the PPT average pain score was less than the Baseline PPT average score by any amount. Also, in 10 minutes or less, the subject must have had a lower PPT average pain score of ≥ 1 unit than the Baseline PPT. Onset was expected to be between 1 and 5 minutes. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Onset of Anesthesia for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

Onset of anesthesia was defined by Pin Prick Test (PPT) unless specific QST thresholds were not met.

  • If the PPT Onset was 5 minutes or less, then QST must have been greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 minutes by any amount and QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.
  • If the PPT Onset was 10 minutes, then QST must have been ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST temperature at 10 minutes.
  • If PPT did not achieve Onset, then QST alone could have achieved onset at either 5 or 10 minutes if QST was greater than the Baseline QST temperature at 5 or 10 minutes by any amount and the QST was ≥ 3 °C of the Baseline QST at 5 or 10 minutes.

QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Percentage of Subjects Reaching Minimal Pain on Pin Prick Test (PPT) (≤2 on Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Any time within one hour post-application

Response is defined as a subject having a PPT average pain score of ≤2 recorded at any single time point where PPT was performed. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

Stage I outcome.
Any time within one hour post-application
Stage I: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) for Pin Prick Test (PPT) (Post-hoc)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

SPID was calculated as a sum of the delta PPT scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta PPT score is defined as the change in PPT score from baseline. PPT scores were assessed using a 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) Numerical Rating Scale at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

The total possible scale range was from -100 (best) to +100 (worst) for SPID at the 30 minute time point, and from -160 (best) to +160 (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application
Stage I: Sum of Temperature Differences (STID) for Heat Sensation Threshold (QST Heat) (Post-hoc)
Time Frame: Up to one hour post-application

STID was calculated as a sum of the delta QST Heat scores at each time point until the designated time point. The delta QST Heat score is defined as the change in QST Heat score from baseline. QST Heat scores were the temperature where the sensation of a heat stimuli was felt: ranging from 35 ºC to a maximum of 50.5 ºC with intervals of 0.5 ºC, at a frequency of every 1 minute for the first 5 minutes and then every 5 minutes thereafter until the final 60 minute time point.

The total possible scale range was from -155 ºC (best) to +155 ºC (worst) for STID at the 30 minute time point, and from -248 ºC (best) to +248 ºC (worst) for SPID at the 60 minute time point Lower scores signify a better outcome (less sensitive to pain than at baseline = less pain with therapy = therapy was more effective).

Stage I outcome.
Up to one hour post-application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cetylite Industries

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Stephen A Cooper, DMD, PhD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C-003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on No Disease State or Condition

Clinical Trials on One spray CTY-5339-A

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings