The Psychosocial Effects of Systemic / Family Constellation
The Psychosocial Effects of Systemic / Family Constellation: An Observational Follow-up Study
The purpose of this study is to investigate the psychosocial effects of systemic / family constellation. The method of systemic / family constellation refers to an approach which integrates ideas from family systems therapy with elements from psychodrama. The constellations are conducted in a group based seminar-setting, each seminar lasting two days.
Considering the very limited amount of empirical data on this method, the study design is a simple pre-post one with a 6-months follow-up. The study will be observational: the researchers will not manipulate who receives the intervention; instead they invite all clients (individuals from the general population) attending these therapeutic workshops run independently of the research process. Given the limited amount of evidence on this therapeutic method, special attention will be given to monitor potential adverse outcomes to establish intervention safety.
It is hypothesized that participation in a family constellation seminar might decrease potential psychological symptoms and will not result in adverse outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Family / systemic constellation therapy is a short-term group psychotherapy aiming to help clients better understand and resolve their conflicts within their personal systems, which in turn might lead to a decrease in psychopathological or functional somatic symptoms. The personal system addressed is most often the family but other inter- or intrapersonal systems (e.g., ego parts, victim-perpetrator dyads) can also be the target of the intervention; the term "family constellation therapy" is used throughout the manuscript in this broader sense. This therapeutic modality was developed in Germany in the early '90s integrating elements of - among others - psychodrama, family sculptures, contextual therapy, and certain South-African aboriginal traditions and has become particularly popular in Europe and South America and even became part of the public health care system in certain countries. Compared to its use by thousands of therapists of various theoretical and professional backgrounds all over the world, little effort has been made to generate empirical data regarding the effectiveness and safety of this intervention.
We believe that the large discrepancy between the relatively high level of penetration into the practice of complementary and alternative medicine versus the low quantity of evidence on effectiveness stems largely from academic psychology's reluctance to engage with at least two metaphysical / anthropological postulates of family constellation therapy. Firstly, the theory of family constellation therapy assumes that an individual's mental and physical health might be significantly influenced by major life events of other members of the personal system even if they lived generations before (e.g., the death of a mother during childbirth might have an effect on her descendants' anxiety level and reproductive success for several generations even if the original event has never been talked about in the descendant's life). While - due to recent developments in epigenetics and the better understanding of transgenerational trauma - this and similar concepts are less shocking to the academic community than they were 3-4 decades ago when family constellation therapy was developed, they are still in sharp contradiction with the common understanding that the etiological factors of any physical or mental illness are to be sought in bio-psycho-social events, situations, or conditions occurring or existing around and after the individual's conception.
The second distinctive feature is that the theory of family constellation therapy assumes that the life-altering, relevant pieces of information are 'stored' and somehow can be 'downloaded' not just automatically and unconsciously by the members of the same system but intentionally by outsiders as well. This accessibility of system-relevant information makes it possible that participants of the single-occasion intervention (who are unknown to each other) are able to perceive and verbalize thoughts, physical perceptions, emotions associated with the history of the system, often unknown even to the recipient of the given constellation. This somewhat 'mystical' re-presentation of unknown facts and hidden dynamics makes it possible for the recipient of the constellation to better understand the etiology of their mental or physical symptoms and intentionally change these very same dynamics. How this storage and access of system-relevant information occurs is highly debated and uncertain; the most-widely held explanation of these processes use the morphic / morphogenic field and -resonance concepts (cf. storage) of the biologist Rupert Sheldrake in combination with the function of mirror neurons (cf. way of accessing stored information by non-members of the system).
Regardless of whether we fully understand the exact mechanisms of action of a therapeutic modality and if its certain assumptions fit the contemporary paradigms of health sciences, we argue that collecting empirical data on an intervention's effectiveness and safety is a public health necessity, especially if it is so widely used as family constellation therapy (and it certainly could provide further impetus to the study of the mechanisms of action and the potential reconsideration of the accuracy of our paradigms).
The very limited number of previous prospective, peer-reviewed studies into family constellation therapy's therapeutic effectiveness reported that the intervention was effective in reducing general, non-diagnosis-specific psychopathology and psychological distress, decreasing the intensity of dermatological symptoms, as well as improving quality of life and functioning in interpersonal relationships. A recent systematic review summarizing both the peer-reviewed and the grey literature on family constellation therapy concluded that further studies into its effectiveness are greatly needed, especially if 1) using at least a mid-term time frame (≥6 months) to evaluate client outcomes, 2) employing active monitoring (not just passive surveillance) of potential iatrogenic effects, and 3) providing information on the presence or absence of therapist effects. The aim of the present study was to collect and analyze further data from the real life setting on family constellation therapy's effectiveness in improving mental health and its tolerability in line with these recommendations.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1037
- Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Self-referred and registered for a family constellation workshop with one of the therapists (clinical psychologist / psychiatrist) who were willing to collaborate with the researchers of the present study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years
- Currently suffers from a diagnosed mental disorder
- Participated actively (not merely as a "representative") in a family constellation intervention in the 12 months preceding baseline assessment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Workshop participants
Participants of systemic / family constellation workshops
|
Systemic / family constellation integrates elements from psychodrama, family sculpture, and spontaneous dramatizations of intra- and interpersonal processes, while spatially visualizing family dynamics.
Family constellations stimulate change through the following ways: 1) making visible the spatial arrangement of relationships within a conflictual system; 2) providing access to the insights of unrelated third parties regarding the sensations, feelings, and thoughts they experienced while representing family members within the constellation; and 3) making observable (from the outside) and experienceable (from within) the transformation of the problem constellation into the solution constellation [Hunger, Weinhold, Bornhäuser, Link, & Schweitzer, 2015].
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in General Severity Index Scores on the Brief Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: Before, 1- and 6-month after the intervention
|
The Hungarian version of the Brief Symptom Inventory was used to measure an individual's overall psychopathology level.
This tool consists of 53 items covering nine symptom dimensions: somatization, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism.
Out of the three global measures of pathology and distress, the General Severity Index (GSI, mean of all items) was used in the present study.
The range of this measure is 0-4, higher scores indicating worse mental health (more psychopathological symptoms).
The range of this measure is 0-4, higher scores indicating worse mental health (more psychopathological symptoms).
|
Before, 1- and 6-month after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Scores on the Experience in Personal Social Systems Questionnaire
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
The Experience in Personal Social Systems Questionnaire assesses social aspects of quality of life (how the respondent feels about their own personal social system).
Total score is created by adding all 12 items and the range is 12-72, higher scores indicating better social quality of life.
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change in Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic Symptom Severity Scale (PHQ-15)
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic Symptom Severity Scale includes 15 somatic symptoms (headache, stomach pain, chest pain, dizziness, etc.) that account for more than 90% of symptoms seen in primary care (exclusive of upper respiratory symptoms).
Total score is the sum of all items, range is 0-30, higher scores indicate more somatic symptoms (worse physical health).
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change in Scores on the SCOFF Questionnaire
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
The SCOFF Questionnaire is a brief screener to detect increased risk for eating disorders.
The total score is created by summing all five items, leading to a score range of 0-5.
Higher scores indicate higher eating disorder risk.
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change in Scores on ad Hoc Items to Assess Behavioral and Substance-related Addictions
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
Items assess perceived problem severity with behavioral and substance-related addictions.
The total scores is created by summing all four items resulting in a score range of 4-28.
Higher scores indicate more severe behavioral and substance-related addiction severity.
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change in Scores on the Meaning in Life Questionnaire / Presence of Meaning Subscale
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
The Presence of Meaning Subscale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire assesses the perceived level of meaning in an individual's life.
Total score is created by summing all 5 subscale items resulting a score range of 5-35.
Higher scores indicate a higher sense of meaning in life (better mental health).
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Change in Scores on the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index (WBI-5)
Time Frame: Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
The World Health Organization Wellbeing Index captures the general well-being of the individual.
Total score is created by summing all 5 items, resulting in a score range of 0-15.
Higher scores indicate better overall well-being.
|
Before, 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
|
Participant-perceived Iatrogenic Effects
Time Frame: 1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
Qualitative responses on the perceived iatrogenic effects of the intervention were collected using-open ended, ad hoc questions.
|
1 month after and 6 months after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Barna Konkoly Thege, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Univeristy of Toronto
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Konkoly Thege B, Petroll C, Rivas C, Scholtens S. The Effectiveness of Family Constellation Therapy in Improving Mental Health: A Systematic Review. Fam Process. 2021 Jun;60(2):409-423. doi: 10.1111/famp.12636. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
- Weinhold J, Hunger C, Bornhauser A, Link L, Rochon J, Wild B, Schweitzer J. Family constellation seminars improve psychological functioning in a general population sample: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Couns Psychol. 2013 Oct;60(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037/a0033539. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
- Hunger C, Weinhold J, Bornhauser A, Link L, Schweitzer J. Mid- and long-term effects of family constellation seminars in a general population sample: 8- and 12-month follow-up. Fam Process. 2015 Jun;54(2):344-58. doi: 10.1111/famp.12102. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
- Hunger C, Bornhauser A, Link L, Schweitzer J, Weinhold J. Improving experience in personal social systems through family constellation seminars: results of a randomized controlled trial. Fam Process. 2014 Jun;53(2):288-306. doi: 10.1111/famp.12051. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
- Konkoly Thege B, Somogyi B, Szabo GS. The Effectiveness of Family Constellation Therapy in Reducing Psychopathological Symptoms in a Naturalistic Setting. Psychiatr Danub. 2022 Fall;34(3):497-505. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2022.497.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 325/2017/P
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mild to Moderate Psychopathological Symptoms
-
NCT05051462CompletedMild to Moderate Psychopathological Symptoms
-
NCT07374653Not yet recruitingMild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms
-
NCT07297797RecruitingMild to Moderate Hypertension
-
NCT07457125RecruitingMild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
-
NCT07166497Completed
-
NCT01354743CompletedMild to Moderate Temporal Atrophy | Moderate to Severe Glabellar Rhytids | Moderate to Severe Periorbital Rhytids
-
NCT05226520CompletedMild to Moderate Levels of Stress
-
NCT05560919CompletedMild to Moderate Anterior Mandibular Segment Crowdind
-
NCT01368835CompletedMild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Cheek | Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Upper Neck | Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Cheek | Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Upper Neck
-
NCT07532512CompletedDepressive Symptoms Mild to Moderate in Severity
Clinical Trials on Systemic / family constellation
-
NCT05051462CompletedMild to Moderate Psychopathological Symptoms
-
NCT03350594Recruiting
-
NCT04911933Active, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety | Mental Health Disorder | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Panic Disorder
-
NCT07228091RecruitingVitreous Hemorrhage | Cataract | Retinal Detachment | Macular Holes | Macular Pucker
-
NCT05557890Active, not recruitingPsychological and Systems Functioning
-
NCT02477605CompletedVitreoretinal Disease
-
NCT02307188CompletedAtrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter
-
NCT01581437Completed
-
NCT07054281WithdrawnProliferative Diabetic Retinopathy | Vitreous Hemorrhage | Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment | Epiretinal Membrane | Vitreomacular Traction | Macular Hole | Visually Significant Vitreous Floater | Retained Lens Material in the Posterior Segment
-
NCT06387758RecruitingSickle Cell Anemia in Children