Acceleration of Orthodontic Tooth Movement

September 26, 2022 updated by: Tishreen University

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Locally Injected Vitamin D3 (Calcitriol or 1,25 Dihidroxicolecalciferol) in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement (A Randomized Controlled Trial)

EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF LOCALLY INJECTED Vitamin D3 (calcitriol or 1.25 dihidroxicolecalciferol) IN ACCELERATING ORTHODONTIC MOVEMENT Design: A randomized, controlled, crossover, double-blind clinical study including Eighteen adult , aged 15-25 years old.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The rate of orthodontic tooth movement depends on two general factors: the forces used in order to cause orthodontic tooth movement and respectively the individual (biological) response of the body to these forces.

There are many methods for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. but, every method has its disadvantages, such as pain and root absorption. Locally injected of vitamin d3 was proposed to accelerates tooth movement with minimal disadvantages, but there aren't enough clinical studies to prove this claim.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to moderate crowding of mandible teeth. In accordance with LITTLE'S IRREGULARITY INDEX
  • Healthy patient
  • No previous orthodontic treatment
  • Vital teeth with periodental tissue without root absorption,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of orthodontic or orthopedic treatment.
  • Presence of craniofacial anomalies.
  • Presence of any signs and symptoms of gingival and periodontal diseases.
  • Presence of significant medical history (including drug allergy).
  • Pregnant and lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Six participants were bonded with 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot brackets (Ortho Smile) using pre-adjusted edgewise appliance with 0.022 MBT prescriptions. Local periodontal injection of 1,25 DHC at weekly interval (3 times). The gingival fluid volume will measured befor and after 1-1.5 hours after first injection. the same is done visit at the second and third visits. Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and face scale
Injection of Dihydroxycholecalciferols solution in the periodontal ligament for lower anterior segment teeth.
Experimental: Group 2
Six participants were bonded with 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot brackets (Ortho Smile) using pre-adjusted edgewise appliance with 0.022 MBT prescriptions. Local periodontal injection of dimethylsulfoxide at weekly interval (3 times). The gingival fluid volume will measured befor and after 1-1.5 hours after first injection. the same is done visit at the second and third visits. Pain during injection and treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and face scale.
Injection of dimethyl sulfoxide in the periodontal ligament for lower anterior segment teeth.
Experimental: Group 3
Six participants were bonded with 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot brackets (Ortho Smile) using pre-adjusted edgewise appliance with 0.022 MBT prescriptions. ocal periodontal injection of serum at weekly interval (3 times). The gingival fluid volume will measured once. Pain during treatment will be assessed using the FLACC scale and face scale.
Injection of serum in the periodontal ligament for lower anterior segment teeth.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Outcome Measure was the overall time needed to complete leveling and aligning (OLAT) the mandible dental arch
Time Frame: 6 months

To calculate outcome measures, a mandible alginate impression was taken to make study casts at three time points:

before insertion of the first archwire (T0), after 1 month of treatment commencement (T1), and at the end of the leveling and alignment stage (T2), represented by final archwire insertion.

LII was used to measure the change in tooth alignment on the casts. It involved measuring the horizontal linear distance among adjacent contact points of the six anterior teeth. The sum of these five measurements gave the value of the index. LII was measured using a digital caliper to the nearest 0.01 mm by the corresponding author.

OLAT was calculated by the number of days between T0 and T2.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Second Outcome Measure was leveling and alignment improvement percentage (LAIP) of the Mandible teeth throughout the leveling and alignment stage.
Time Frame: 6 months

OLAT was calculated by the number of days between T0 and T2. LAIP was calculated by dividing the amount of change in the LII value at a specific time point (T1, T2 ; calculated by subtracting the LII value at T1, T2 from the LII value at T0) by Lll value at T0. OLAT was calculated by the number of days between T0 and T2.

LAIP was calculated by dividing the amount of change in the LII value at a specific time point (T1, T2 ; calculated by subtracting the LII value at T1, T2 from the LII value at T0) by Lll value at T0.

6 months
VAS scale
Time Frame: 3 weeks
to measure patient pain or discomfort
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study Protocol, Informed Consent Form

IPD Sharing Time Frame

8 months

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild to Moderate Anterior Mandibular Segment Crowdind

Clinical Trials on Dihydroxycholecalciferols

Subscribe