Mental Ability Challenge Study in Adults With and Without HIV

February 21, 2019 updated by: Asante Kamkwalala, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Cholinergic Correlates of Impaired Cognitive Ability in HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders

It is estimated that by 2016, nearly 50% of HIV-positive individuals in the US will be aged 50 or older, and up to 60% of those will experience some degree of cognitive impairment as they age. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the contribution of the neuronal cholinergic receptor system to the cognitive impairments seen in adults aging with chronic HIV Infection. By using anti-cholinergic challenge drugs to reversibly "stress" cognitive functioning, the investigators hope to understand whether the presence of the HIV virus in the brain impairs the neural system necessary for normal cognition, more than would be expected from normal cognitive aging.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is intended to evaluate the involvement of the neuronal cholinergic receptor system in the accelerated cognitive aging profile seen in adults living with chronic HIV-1 infection. It is estimated by the CDC that by the year 2016, nearly 50% of the US' HIV-positive population will be 50 or older. The HIV-1 virus is known to enter the CNS very rapidly after initial infection, and cause a pattern of persistent neural inflammation, which is deleterious to neurons and glia. This damage is believed to be the basis of cognitive impairment associated with long-term chronic HIV infection, known as HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). Successful introduction of Anti-Retroviral Treatment (ART) has greatly reduced the likelihood of progressing to the most severe category of HAND (HIV-Associated Dementia), however the mild and moderate forms (Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment and Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, respectively) are still fairly common even in adults declared "virally suppressed", with little to no detectable peripheral viral DNA/RNA. Prior studies have shown that over the lifetime, more than 50% of adults diagnosed with HIV will experience some degree of cognitive impairment as they age. Some of these changes may be due to cholinergic dysfunction. The acetylcholinergic receptor system is necessary for normal cognitive performance, and is active during working memory, executive functioning, attention, and learning tasks. It has been shown that as the human brain ages, cognitive ability begins to decline, and correlates with declining acetylcholinergic activity. The cholinergic theory of cognitive aging postulates that this loss of activity at cholinergic receptors with age is at least partly responsible for poorer cognitive performance in aging. I will use this model to examine the impact of HIV infection on cholinergic system functioning. This study will use a well-established anti-cholinergic drug challenge model to evaluate cognitive performance in domains of cognitive functioning relevant to cholinergic functioning. Under conditions of temporary muscarinic or nicotinic blockade, or a combination of both, I aim to explore the contribution of putative cholinergic receptor dysfunction to the observed symptoms of HAND. I also intend to determine whether age and HIV-status interact to produce an accelerated pattern of cholinergic cognitive aging that would indicate that older adults with HIV are at higher risk for more rapid cognitive aging than HIV-negative individuals. If successful, the outcome of this study would support the future exploration of novel pro-cholinergic medications to treat cognitive symptoms of HAND, which may improve quality of life for adults living with chronic HIV infection, as they survive into old age.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV-Positive Healthy older adults and HIV-Negative Healthy older adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 35 years of age or older;
  2. HIV-Positive (must be on ART's for at least 6 months, most recent viral load (within 6 months) <50, CD4+ count >200, must be diagnosed HIV-positive at least 5 years) or HIV-Negative, At-Risk Individuals
  3. Able and willing to give written informed consent
  4. Negative urine pregnancy test
  5. Adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unmanaged HIV Infection, identified by no current medication regimen or the presence of one or more AIDS-defining conditions
  2. Fagerstrom cigarettes per day (CPD) score of '2' indicating heavy use of nicotine
  3. An ART regimen including a Protease Inhibitor Medication
  4. A documented history of cardiac disease or abnormal ECG at Screening
  5. Current alcohol or substance abuse, particularly intravenously
  6. Current use of psychoactive medications (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, etc.)
  7. Current Axis I or Axis II psychiatric disorder
  8. History of myocardial infarction in the past year or unstable or severe cardiovascular disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
HIV-Positive
Patients will be administered each of 4 possible treatments: high dose (5 mcg/kg) scopolamine, high dose (20 mg) mecamylamine, a low dose combination (2.5mcg/kg and 10 mg) of scopolamine and mecamylamine, or placebo.
Drug: Scopolamine Injectable Product
2.5 or 5 mcg/kg of scopolamine via IV
Drug: Mecamylamine Pill
10 or 20mg of mecamylamine orally
HIV-Negative
Patients will be administered each of 4 possible treatments: high dose (5 mcg/kg) scopolamine, high dose (20 mg) mecamylamine, a low dose combination (2.5mcg/kg and 10 mg) of scopolamine and mecamylamine, or placebo.
Drug: Scopolamine Injectable Product
2.5 or 5 mcg/kg of scopolamine via IV
Drug: Mecamylamine Pill
10 or 20mg of mecamylamine orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Outcome - Lower verbal memory score
Time Frame: 2 hours
Cognitive performance will be more significantly impaired by study medications in HIV-positive participants relative to HIV-negative participants, indicating impairment of cholinergic neurotransmitter system.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age and HIV-Status Interaction - Slower CRTreaction time
Time Frame: 2 hours
Older age and positive HIV status will interact to more significantly impair cognitive performance as measured by reaction time on the Choice Reaction Time task under the influence of study medications, than either variable alone.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 150929

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Scopolamine Injectable Product

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings