Acute Effects of Open and Closed Suction Systems in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

August 16, 2017 updated by: Talita Dias da Silva, University of Sao Paulo

Acute Effects of Open and Closed Suction Systems on Pulmonary Mechanics and Cardiovascular Function in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Seventy-one patients in intensive care were randomized for initial treatment with open suction systems or closed suction systems in a cross-over design. Pulmonary and cardiovascular physiology was assessed immediately before and after three 10-second aspirations per suction. Were analyzed the effect of each suction system on physiologic parameters while adjusting for their respective values prior to suction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Participants. The sample consisted of 71 subjects, both genders, hospitalized in intensive care units. This study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Heliopolis Hospital - Sao Paulo - Brazil.

Patients were randomized in the following way: patients hospitalized in the odd beds of ICU were aspirated initially by open suction system (OSS) and later by the closed suction system (CSS); patients hospitalized in the even beds were aspirated by CSS, initially, and subsequently by the OSS.

Cardiopulmonary measures: Eligible patients were evaluated for the presence or absence of neural stimulation to spontaneous ventilation (drive breathing). If the patients showed spontaneous respiratory movements, they were sedated to the level four of Ramsay scale. After this initial evaluation, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SAT), tidal volume (Vt), peak pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplat), positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), and inspiratory flow (V) were measured. The HR and SAT data were collected by visualization of DX 2010 multiparameter monitor from Dixtal. SBP, DBP and MBP were obtained by a single measurement provided by the same monitor. Data of peak pressure, plateau pressure, positive end expiratory pressure, inspiratory flow and tidal volume were used to calculate compliance (C) and airway resistance (R). Data were collected before and after tracheal aspiration.

Pulmonary Suction: After the initial data were obtained, patients who were under volume-controlled ventilation mode (VCV) were submitted to the first aspiration procedure according to randomization described above. Patients who were under pressure-controlled ventilation mode (PCV) were changed to VCV mode, respecting the individual mean tidal volume, which means that the tidal volume of the patient under PCV would be used to ventilate in VCV. All patients were ventilated with a Savina (Drager) mechanical ventilator. Aspiration procedures and data collection were done by a health care professional unaware of the study regimes or objectives. After the measurement of the initial parameters, patients underwent the procedure of aspiration in an open or closed system according to the randomization described above. All patients were aspirated by a system that had not been used previously. The procedure was timed and required 10 seconds to insert and remove the aspiration catheter, with each aspiration performed three times. The outside diameter of the aspiration catheter had half the inner diameter of the endotracheal tube, and the negative pressure was adjusted between 70 and 100 mmHg. At the end of the aspiration procedure, physiological assessments were repeated. Patients were returned to nursing care and underwent the second procedure after six hours from initial aspiration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients over 18 years old;
  • intubated with a 7.5mm endotracheal tube;
  • mechanically ventilated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • upper gastrointestinal bleeding;
  • hemodynamic instability;
  • airway bleeding;
  • previous lung diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Closed suction system
Patients in mechanical ventilation were aspirated with closed suction system.
In mechanically ventilated patients, intratracheal secretions were aspirated with closed suction systems to compare the pulmonary and cardiovascular parameters (Peak Pressure, Resistance, and Pressure Plateau, Heart Rate and Mean, Diastolic, and Systolic Pressures) with open suction system.
Active Comparator: Open suction system
Patients in mechanical ventilation were aspirated with open suction system.
In mechanically ventilated patients, intratracheal secretions were aspirated with open suction systems to compare the pulmonary and cardiovascular parameters (Peak Pressure, Resistance, and Pressure Plateau, Heart Rate and Mean, Diastolic, and Systolic Pressures) with closed suction system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvements in Pulmonary parameters when comparing closed and open suction systems.
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of Peak Pressure (cmH20) in both closed and open suction systems.
1 day
Improvements in Cardiovascular parameters when comparing Closed and open suction systems.
Time Frame: 1 day
Assessment of Blood Pressure (mmHg) in both closed and open suction systems.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo D Raimundo, Ph.D., Faculdade de Medicina do ABC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 467

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on Closed suction system

Search Similar Trials