Validation of the TOF Cuff Monitor® Which Measures Neuromuscular Block on the Upper Arm

October 29, 2019 updated by: Christoph Czarnetzki

The Comparison of the TOF Cuff Monitor® With the TOF Watch SX® Monitor:

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are frequently used in anesthesia and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is standard care. The TOF WATCH SX® monitor is considered as one of the reference monitoring devices in clinical research and clinical practice. With this monitor the ulnar nerve is stimulated at the wrist and the force of the movement of the thumb is measured with acceleromyography. This method requires freedom of movement of the patient's thumb. Unfortunately this is not always possible due to the constraints of patient positioning during the operation. The TOF Cuff® monitor is a modified non-invasive blood pressure cuff that incorporates stimulating electrodes in its inner surface and is based on the stimulation of the peripheral nerve in the arm (brachial plexus, ulnar and median nerves principally). The evoked neuromuscular activity is recorded through the changes in pressure generated in the inner part of the cuff by the muscular activity after the stimulus. Moreover, this device can be used for non-invasive reading of the blood pressure. This device has been validated with mechanomyography, but was never been compared with acceleromyography, which is the most common used neuromuscular monitoring method.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are frequently used in anesthesia for tracheal intubation, artificial ventilation, and continued muscle relaxation during surgical interventions. It is of particular importance to measure the neuromuscular block for several reasons:

  1. To monitor the onset of neuromuscular block and to intubate when deep muscular relaxation is attained.
  2. To choose the best antagonist and its dosage dependent of the degree of neuromuscular block (for instance sugammadex for deep neuromuscular block or neostigmine for superficial block).
  3. To avoid antagonization of neuromuscular block in the case of complete recovery of neuromuscular function.

It is proven that monitoring of neuromuscular block reduces patient mortality. It avoids postoperative residual curarization, which is associated with complications such as hypoxemia, bronchoaspiration and pneumonia. Therefore the development and validation of new and efficacious neuromuscular monitoring devices is of great importance.

Neuromuscular monitoring is done by stimulating with an electric current a nerve and to measure the response of the corresponding muscle. In clinical practice acceleromyography is the most often used quantitative measurement method, because it is much easier to apply than other established quantitative neuromuscular monitoring methods such as mechanomyograpy and electromyography. Acceleromyography is based on the piezoelectric effect where mechanical forces at play on the surfaces of certain materials, such as crystals or ceramics, induce an electrical current. According to Newton's second law of motion, force equals mass times acceleration (F=m x a). At constant mass, the acceleration measured and the voltage thereby generated can be used to derive the force of the stimulated muscle. It is standard practice to stimulate the ulnar nerve at the wrist and to measure the movement of the adductor pollicis. In the research setting acceleromyography (TOF Watch SX® monitor) is an established and widely used method. This method requires freedom of movement of the patient's thumb. Unfortunately this is not always possible due to the constraints of patient positioning during the operation. The TOF Cuff® monitor is a modified non-invasive blood pressure cuff that incorporates stimulating electrodes in its inner surface and is based on the stimulation of the peripheral nerve in the arm (brachial plexus, ulnar and median nerves principally). The evoked neuromuscular activity is recorded through the changes in pressure generated in the inner part of the cuff by the muscular activity after the stimulus. Moreover, this device can be used for non-invasive reading of the blood pressure. This device has been validated with mechanomyography, but was never been compared with acceleromyography, which is the most common used neuromuscular monitoring method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • University Hospitals of Geneva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients, age ≥18 to 65 years
  • Patient with American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] status I or II
  • Patient able to read and understand the information sheet and to sign and date the consent form
  • Patient scheduled for elective surgery lasting at least 60 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to rocuronium
  • Patient with pacemaker
  • Patients with neuromuscular disease
  • Patients with preoperative medications known to influence neuromuscular function (for instance aminoglycosides, phenytoin, lidocaine)
  • Patients with electrolyte abnormalities (for instance, hypermagnesemia)
  • Patients with a body mass index <19 or >30 kg m2
  • Patient having participated in any clinical trial within 30 days, inclusive, of signing the informed consent form of the current trial
  • Patients undergoing interventions that need a continuous deep NMB (for surgical reasons).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Tof Watch SX and Tof Cuff
Patients undergoing surgery with intubation and receiving a single intubation dose of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) under propofol anesthesia will have monitoring of neuromuscular block with two monitors simultaneously.
Device: Tof cuff
The Tof Cuff will be installed on one arm. After anesthesia induction the Tof Cuff will be calibrated and continuos monitoring of the neuromuscular block started until complete recovery of neuromuscular block.
Device: Tof Watch SX
The Tof Watch SX will be installed on the opposite arm to the Tof Cuff. After anesthesia induction the Tof Watch SX will be calibrated and continuos monitoring of the neuromuscular block started until complete recovery of neuromuscular block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total recovery time of neuromuscular block
Time Frame: 60 to 120 minutes
The total recovery time, i.e. total duration of the neuromuscular block is defined as the time in minutes from start of injection of rocuronium until a normalized TOF ratio of 90% (Dur TOF 0.9). TOF = Train of Four
60 to 120 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset time
Time Frame: 1 to 4 minutes
time in seconds from start of injection of rocuronium until 95% depression of the first twitch (T1) of the TOF(Train of Four)
1 to 4 minutes
Duration TOF count 1
Time Frame: 20 - 30 minutes
Time (in minutes) from administration of rocuronium to emergence of the 1st twitch of the TOF (Dur TOFc1)
20 - 30 minutes
Duration TOF 25%
Time Frame: 30 - 40 minutes
Time (in minutes) from administration of rocuronium to emergence of a normalized TOF ratio of 25%
30 - 40 minutes
Duration TOF 50%
Time Frame: 30 - 50 minutes
Time (in minutes) from administration of rocuronium to emergence of a normalized TOF ratio of 50%
30 - 50 minutes
Duration TOF 75%
Time Frame: 30 - 60 minutes
Time (in minutes) from administration of rocuronium to emergence of a normalized TOF ratio of 75%
30 - 60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Christoph Czarnetzki

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Christoph Czarnetzki, MD, University Hospitals of Geneva

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 14, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 14, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TofCuff Study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blockade

Clinical Trials on Tof cuff

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings