The Effect of Using Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

August 24, 2017 updated by: Ahmed Abdelazim Abdelrahim Hassan, Assiut University

The Effect of Using Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion : a Randomized Comparative Trial

the study aims to determine the effect of using Autologous platelet rich plasma on both the quality & rate of posterior lumbar interbody fusion & its outcome on the Patient regarding postoperative lumbar pain & functional outcome

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will be submitted for approval by the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients prior to enrollment. The study population will be selected from patients attending the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma surgery, Assiut University hospitals.

Sixty patients will be selected for the study and will be randomized into two group one receiving posterior lumbar interbody fusion with Autologous platelet rich plasma and the other group will receive posterior lumbar interbody fusion without Autologous platelet rich plasma.

Methodology pre-operative preparation: Prior to the operation the selected patients will perform lumbar spine Computarised tomography and X ray films. Both the visual analogue scale of pain and the Oswestry disability index will be collected from the patients

Autologous platelet rich plasma preparation:

Autologous Platelet rich plasma is obtained using a two-stage centrifugation process.

Whole blood sample will be drawn from the participant and be collected in a sterile tube containing anticoagulant (sodium citrate 3.8% or Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ). The tube will be centrifuged at 160xg relative centrifugal force (about 1000 round per minute) for 10 min in a centrifugal apparatus. The first spin will separate platelet poor plasma at the top from red blood cells at the bottom and platelet rich plasma above (mixed with the white blood cells in the buffy coat). The Platelet poor plasma, Platelet rich plasma and a few red blood cells will be aspirated into a new tube, mixed and in the second spin, the tube will be centrifuged at 400xg relative centrifugal form (about 1500 round per minute) for another 10 minutes. The upper section will consist of Platelet poor plasma and the Platelet rich plasma will be collected at the bottom of the tube in the form of pellet. Then, Platelet poor plasma and Platelet rich plasma will be aspirated and mixed (discarding the upper portion). Prior to treatment calcium chloride 3% will be added to activate platelets immediately before its application to avoid coagulation of the specimen (for every 1.5 milliliter plasma, 1 milliliter calcium chloride 3% is added).

Surgery:

A posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation will be performed through a midline posterior approach. Trans-pedicular screws will be placed under fluoroscopic guidance, followed by discectomy. The vertebral body endplates will be prepared by curetting until point bleeding was seen.

Autologous cancellous bone chips will be harvested unilaterally from the iliac wing, approached through the midline posterior incision. The bone chips will be steeped in the plasma solution until clotting occurred visually (approximately 10 minutes). In the control group, the bone chips will be filled with autologous bone in the same way and were implanted after approximately 10 minutes without incubation in a plasma solution.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spondylolisthesis.
  • Degenerative disc disease requiring posterior lumbar interbody fusion not responding to medical treatment for 1 year.
  • Age between 20 & 70 years.
  • Single or multiple level fusions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery.
  • Other lumbar spine pathology
  • severe osteoporosis
  • Chronic use of steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (more than one year)
  • Patients younger than 20 years old.
  • Patients older than 70 years old.
  • Immunocompromised patients (eg. Chronic renal failure)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: posterior lumbar interbody fusion + platelet rich plasma
the addition of autologous platelet rich plasma to the bone graft
Biological: autologous platelet rich plasma
adding autologous platelet rich plasma to the bone graft harvested from the patient
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: posterior lumbar interbody fusion
bone graft alone
Procedure: posterior lumbar interbody fusion without autologous platelet rich plasma
performing posterior lumbar interbody fusion without using platelet rich plasma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bridging trabecular bone scale
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 month post-operative
the degree of bridging bone across the fused vertebral bodies
from 3 to 6 month post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogue of pain
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 month post-operative
the amount of pain sensed by the patient pre and post-operative
from 3 to 6 month post-operative
the Oswestry disability index
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 month post-operative
the functional outcome on the patient
from 3 to 6 month post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Platelet rich plasma

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma Effect on Bone Healing

Clinical Trials on autologous platelet rich plasma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings