Gadolinium and Ferumoxytol MRI in Diagnosing Patients With Abnormalities in the Central Nervous System

February 25, 2026 updated by: Ramon Barajas, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

The Feasibility of Steady State CBV Mapping Using Ferumoxytol Immediately After Gadolinium Enhanced MRI of the CNS

This phase II trial studies how well gadolinium and ferumoxytol magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) work in diagnosing patients with abnormalities in the central nervous system. Diagnostic procedures, such as gadolinium and ferumoxytol MRI, may help find and diagnose abnormalities in the central nervous system.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test if prior gadolinium administration affects vascular imaging using ferumoxytol.

II. To test signal changes of T2*w multi-echo fast field echo (mFFE) scans before and after contrast agent injection.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test if ferumoxytol affects gadolinium enhanced MRI. II. To test if steady state cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps are different at various magnetic field strengths.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore late ferumoxytol enhancement (optional MRI) hours to days after ferumoxytol administration in various brain pathologies.

II. To evaluate the effects of ferumoxytol on malignant and non-malignant lesions in head & neck, and liver lesions

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive gadolinium intravenously (IV) and then ferumoxytol IV and undergo MRI over 60 minutes on day 1.

GROUP II: Patients receive ferumoxytol IV and then gadolinium IV and undergo MRI over 60 minutes on day 1.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
150

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Amy E Huddleston, MPA:HA, CCRP
  • Phone Number: 5034942910
  • Email: huddlesa@ohsu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ramon Barajas, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have one of the following:

    • Neurological findings (i.e. headache, loss of consciousness, paresis, cranial neuropathy, seizures, etc.)
    • Radiological abnormalities in the brain (neoplastic or non-neoplastic in nature)
    • Neoplastic process elsewhere in the body that may affect the brain (i.e. possible metastasis, vascular compromise, treatment related changes, etc.)
  • Subjects must be able to undergo MRI imaging without anesthesia
  • Subjects must be at least 10 years of age
  • All subjects, or their legal guardians, must sign a written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization in accordance with institutional guidelines
  • Sexually active women of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; surgical intervention i.e. tubal ligation or vasectomy; post-menopausal < 6 months; or abstinence) for at least two months after each cycle of the study; should a female become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with clinically significant signs of uncal herniation, such as acute pupillary enlargement, rapidly developing motor changes (over hours), or rapidly decreasing level of consciousness, are not eligible
  • Subjects with known allergic or hypersensitivity reactions to parenteral iron, parenteral dextran, parenteral iron-dextran, or parenteral iron-polysaccharide preparations (Ferumoxytol Investigator's Drug Brochure, 2009); subjects with significant drug or other allergies or autoimmune diseases may be enrolled at the investigator's discretion
  • Subjects who are pregnant or lactating or who suspect they might be pregnant
  • Subjects who have a contraindication for MRI: metal in their bodies (a cardiac pacemaker or other incompatible device), are severely agitated, or have an allergy to gadolinium containing contrast material
  • Subjects with known iron overload (genetic hemochromatosis); in subjects with a family history of hemochromatosis, hemochromatosis must be ruled out prior to study entry with normal values of the following blood tests: transferrin saturation (TS) test and serum ferritin (SF) test; all associated costs will be paid by the study
  • Subject who have received ferumoxytol within 3 weeks of study entry
  • Subjects with three or more drug allergies from separate drug classes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group I (gadolinium, ferumoxytol, MRI)
Patients receive gadolinium IV and then ferumoxytol IV and undergo MRI over 60 minutes on day 1.
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan
  • Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • MR Imaging
  • MRI Scan
  • NMR Imaging
  • NMRI
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Drug: Ferumoxytol
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Feraheme
  • Ferumoxytol Non-Stoichiometric Magnetite
Drug: Gadolinium
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Gd
Experimental: Group II (ferumoxytol, gadolinium, MRI)
Patients receive ferumoxytol IV and then gadolinium IV and undergo MRI over 60 minutes on day 1.
Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan
  • Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • MR Imaging
  • MRI Scan
  • NMR Imaging
  • NMRI
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Drug: Ferumoxytol
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Feraheme
  • Ferumoxytol Non-Stoichiometric Magnetite
Drug: Gadolinium
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Gd

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visualization of normal vasculature
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Primary analysis will use the average score of the two readers. The mean difference and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) between the two groups will be estimated using a linear regression model. Equivalence will be claimed if the 95% CI does not include 0.4 on either side (equivalence margin is 0.4).
Up to 5 years
Visualization of abnormal vasculature
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Primary analysis will use the average score of the two readers. The mean difference and the associated 95% CI between the two groups will be estimated using a linear regression model. Equivalence will be claimed if the 95% CI does not include 0.4 on either side (equivalence margin is 0.4).
Up to 5 years
Visualization of normal anatomical structures
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Primary analysis will use the average score of the two readers. The mean difference and the associated 95% CI between the two groups will be estimated using a linear regression model. Equivalence will be claimed if the 95% CI does not include 0.4 on either side (equivalence margin is 0.4).
Up to 5 years
Identification of the lesion corresponding areas on cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
Will assess the confidence in identifying the lesion corresponding areas on CBV maps as well as signal change (deltaR2*) and relative cerebral blood volume. Primary analysis will use the average score of the two readers. The mean difference and the associated 95% CI between the two groups will be estimated using a linear regression model. Equivalence will be claimed if the 95% CI does not include 0.4 on either side (equivalence margin is 0.4).
Up to 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast enhancement
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The mean difference and the associated 95% CI before versus after ferumoxytol in the three visualization variables will be estimated using a paired t-test based on the average score of the two readers. Will use the same equivalence margin of 0.4. To compare the two magnetic field strengths, will also use a linear regression model to analyze contrast to noise ratios, Image homogeneity and susceptibility artifacts (the latter two based on average score of the two readers).
Up to 5 years
Border delineation
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The mean difference and the associated 95% CI before versus after ferumoxytol in the three visualization variables will be estimated using a paired t-test based on the average score of the two readers. Will use the same equivalence margin of 0.4. To compare the two magnetic field strengths, will also use a linear regression model to analyze contrast to noise ratios, Image homogeneity and susceptibility artifacts (the latter two based on average score of the two readers).
Up to 5 years
Internal morphology
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The mean difference and the associated 95% CI before versus after ferumoxytol in the three visualization variables will be estimated using a paired t-test based on the average score of the two readers. Will use the same equivalence margin of 0.4. To compare the two magnetic field strengths, will also use a linear regression model to analyze contrast to noise ratios, Image homogeneity and susceptibility artifacts (the latter two based on average score of the two readers).
Up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Oregon Health and Science University
Celgene Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael F Regner, MD, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00017028 (Other Identifier: OHSU Knight Cancer Institute)
  • NCI-2017-01460 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Brain

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings