Influence of Two Different Flap Designs for Sinus Floor Elevation
Influence of Two Different Flap Designs for Sinus Floor Elevation. A Split-mouth Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Siena, Italy, 53100
- Siena University, Department of Periodontology, Policlinico Le Scotte Siena.
-
Siena, Italy, 53100
- Tuscan School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient edentulous in the maxillary posterior area on both left and right side
- residual bone height in the maxillary premolar and molar region less than 4mm
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of systemic diseases that would contraindicate surgical treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
test side ( horizontal flap)
Horizontal incision was realised in alveolar mucosa, in order to obtain the exposure of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, thus accessing the sinus cavity
|
after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up
Other Names:
|
|
control side ( standard flap)
Trapezoidal flap was realised, using a crestal incision and two deep vertical incisions extended in the fornix to expose the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus
|
after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
height of augmented bone obtained
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the height of the gained bone was recorded by using the control CT scan, realized after 6 months of follow up
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of the surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
|
both total and partial times of different surgical steps were recorded
|
1 day
|
|
Post surgical patient's discomfort
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
all patients were asked to fill out a VAS scale, graduated from 1 (minimal pain ) to 10 ( maximum pain)
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: marco ferrari, clinical director, tuscan school of dental medicine, university of Firenze and Siena
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MSL001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.