- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04374227
The Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) on Proprioception in Adults
The Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) on Proprioception in Adults: A Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will go through an informed consent process, fill out a screening questionnaire and will undergo neurological testing. If there are any abnormalities in their neurological testing or they meet exclusion criteria, they will not be included in the study. The neurological testing will include reflex testing, sensation testing, strength testing, and coordination and balance tests.
Participants will then be randomized into 2 groups. One control and one treatment.
Each group will have their balance measured using the portable force plate. Participants will be tested on both feet with arms crossed and eyes open for 60 seconds, and both feet with arms crossed and eyes closed for 60 seconds. Then they will be given 15 seconds to practice standing on the force plate on only their right leg with eyes open and arms crossed. The investigators will then test their balance on their right leg with arms crossed and eyes open for 30 seconds. They will be given 15 seconds to practice standing on their right leg with their arms crossed and eyes closed, and then will have their balance tested on their right leg with arms crossed and eyes closed for 30 seconds. The same sequence of events will take place for the left leg as their right leg. This sequence of measurements will take place at the beginning and end of their first treatment visit. For the standing test with eyes closed and all single leg tests someone will be standing beside the force plate with an arm and either side of the participant to prevent the participant from falling and hurting themselves.
The force plate calculates the center of mass of the participant, the area that is covered by the center of mass, the length of the path of center of mass, the velocity of its motion, and the maximum sway in the x and y planes.
During the single leg tests, the investigators will also record the time of when the participant brings the other foot down, touches the two legs together, or if the sternum becomes outside the borders of the pelvis, if they do lose their balance The test duration will be 30 seconds, as stated previously.
Between the two balance tests, the treatment group will receive a full-body osteopathic manipulative treatment according to the Common Compensatory Pattern (CCP). CCP is a treatment approach developed by Dr. Zinc that addresses the transition areas of the body. The treatment will be given by one of the four fellows under supervision by a licensed physician and last 10-20 minutes. The treatment will include the following body regions:
Occipito-atlantal Joint Thoracic Inlet Thoraco-lumbar shift Lumbo-pelvic roll Ribs Sacrum Pelvis Upslip Upper extremity Lower extremity
The fellows will diagnose somatic dysfunctions within these body regions, treat, and reassess to make sure the somatic dysfunctions are resolved. The physician will perform a spinal sweep and side-to-side height assessments before and after treatment to verify there was improvement in somatic dysfunctions.
After the treatment, the treatment group will walk around the perimeter of the lab for 5 minutes before retesting their balance.
The control group will be asked to lay on an OMM (Osteopathic Manual Medicine) treatment for 15 minutes. They will then walk around the perimeter of the lab for 5 minutes before retesting their balance.
The treatment group will come for five visits. The first visit will include the informed consent and neurological exam. The second visit will include a balance measurement, a treatment, and a follow-up balance measurement immediately after the treatment. The next two visits will consist only of osteopathic treatments. Each visit will be spaced one week apart. The participant will come back a week after their last treatment and complete follow-up balance testing.
The control group will have a total of five visits. They will have the same initial visit as the treatment group with informed consent and neurological exam. Their second visit will consist of a balance measurement, have somatic dysfunctions be diagnosed, yet not be treated and have an immediate follow-up measurement. The third and fourth visits will consist of diagnosing somatic dysfunctions without any treatment. The last visit will consist of a follow-up balance testing. Each of these visits will be one week apart.
The data from the force that will be used includes area that the center of mass covers, length of pathway of center of mass, velocity of the center of mass, medial-lateral sway, and anterior-posterior sway. The investigators will also use the length of time participants were able to stand on one leg without losing their balance (without moving their knee or chest outside of their midline, their foot leaving the platform, touching their opposite foot to the ground, or letting their legs touch).
Summary descriptive statistics will be first obtained for the selected variables and demographics covariates as appropriate. For a particular variable, the change between pre- (or baseline) and post- treatment during the first week reflects the immediate treatment effect while the difference between the pre-treatment baseline and the last measurement during week 4 represents the long-term lasting accumulative effect. The data bear the characteristics of repeated measurements on the same study participants since more than one measurements are taken on the same study participant over time. Thus, it is usually plausible to assume the measurements on the same individual subjects are correlated. Ignoring the covariance between such measurements may result in erroneous statistical inference, and avoiding it by data transformation may result in inefficient statistical inference. The statistical technique of linear mixed model allows the covariance structure to be integrated into the modeling while accounting for the randomness of the study subjects. Thus, the data will be analyzed separately for each variable with a linear mixed-effect model with repeated measures design to assess the OMT effects on the balance measurement metrics over time. In the model fitting process, several candidate covariance structures will be selected and evaluated according to the experimental design (i.e., unequal spacing of the time points but with the same time points across the study participants, within-subject correlation over time and convergence of model fitting), out of which one optimal covariance structure will be selected by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) criteria. On the basis of the chosen models for the respective variables, statistical contrasts will be set up to compare the mean values of variable measurements between time points to assess the immediate and long-term effects of OMT treatment. Tukey procedure for the multiple testing adjustment will be used to compute the adjusted p-value in case of need.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50311
- Des Moines University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must be 18-40 years old
- Have the ability to give consent
- Be able to bare weight on both feet
Exclusion Criteria:
- had manipulation performed by a D.O., physical therapist, or chiropractor in the last two months,
- had surgery in the six months
- had broken or fractured a bone in the last six months
- have an abnormal neurological exam
- cerebellar dysfunction or ataxia
- has a condition that impairs balance (including orthostatic hypertension,otoneurologic conditions, or arrhythmias)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Group
The treatment group received three osteopathic manipulative treatments once a week for three weeks.
The osteopathic manipulative treatment was a full body treatment based upon Dr. Zink's model of a common compensatory pattern.
|
Body regions that were treated included head, cervical, thoracic, ribs, lumbar, pelvis, sacrum, lower extremity, and upper extremity.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
This group received an osteopathic structural exam once a week for three weeks without any treatment performed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of pathway of center of mass
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
the center of mass of the participant is tracked on the force plate and the overall length it travels will be recorded
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
|
area covered by center of mass
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
the center of mass of the participant is tracked on the force plate and its total area covered was measured
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
|
velocity of center of mass
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
the center of mass of the participant is tracked on the force plate and the velocity at which that point moved was measured
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
|
medial-lateral sway
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
the center of mass of the participant is tracked on the force plate and the amount of lateral movement the point had was measured
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
|
anterior-posterior sway
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
the center of mass of the participant is tracked on the force plate and the amount of front-to-back movement the point had was measured
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
|
Time
Time Frame: 60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
we measured the amount of time participants were able to stand upright without touching the ground or having one leg touch the other in the single-leg tests
|
60 seconds for two leg testing, 30 seconds for single leg testing, timing may de different if participant fell
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB-2019-26
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteopathy in Diseases Classified Elsewhere
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedGeriatric Oncology | Osteopathy in Other Diseases Classified Elsewhere
-
Oklahoma State University Center for Health SciencesNot yet recruitingThe Utility of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine in Weaning Patients from the Ventilator Pilot TrialRespiratory Failure | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified Elsewhere
-
Kırıkkale UniversityCompletedPeripheral Arterial Disease | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereTurkey
-
Kagawa UniversityUnknownChorioretinal Disorders in Diseases Classified ElsewhereJapan
-
University of Firenze and Siena, Napoli, ItalyCompletedBone Involvement in Diseases Classified ElsewhereItaly
-
University of Firenze and Siena, Napoli, ItalyCompletedMinimally Invasive Lateral Approach for Sinus Augmentation: a Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.Bone Involvement in Diseases Classified ElsewhereItaly
-
New York Institute of TechnologyAmerican Osteopathic AssociationRecruitingType2 Diabetes Mellitus | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereUnited States
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingEndometriosis | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereFrance
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingParkinson Disease | Osteopathy in Diseases Classified ElsewhereUnited States
-
Université Catholique de LouvainSuspendedDeaf Nonspeaking, Not Elsewhere ClassifiedBelgium
Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
-
Ecole d'ostéopathie de ParisUniversity of Paris 5 - Rene DescartesCompleted
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedBreast Feeding, ExclusiveFrance
-
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center, New YorkUnknownHeadacheUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyCompletedDistorted; Balance | Post-Concussion SymptomsUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingParkinson's Disease | ConstipationUnited States
-
Come CollaborationUniversity of ChietiCompleted
-
New York Institute of TechnologyWithdrawn
-
University of California, San DiegoEnrolling by invitation
-
Ariel UniversityAssociazione Italiana Rett (AIRETT)Not yet recruitingRett SyndromeItaly