Evaluation of a Short Version Computerized Test for Processing Speed to Detect Cognitive Disorders in HIV+ Patients (NEURACog)

May 17, 2019 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
The objective of this prospective study is to evaluate the prevalence of neurocognitive impairments in HIV infected patients comparing patients with and without HAART. Recent studies have demonstrated a specific HIV infected patients neurocognitive disorders profile. These cognitive disorders concern primarily information processing speed, memory recall, attentional abilities, work related memory, executive functions, and psychometrical speed. This cognitive profile is similar to another highly documented one, described for another central nervous system disease (CNS): multiple sclerosis. In both CNS diseases, the earliest and most severe disorder is the one related to the information processing speed. For the multiple sclerosis patients, a short cognitive test (SDMT) is actually used not only to identify cognitive disorders presence, but also in order to predict a long term disability worsening. A digital version of this test (CSCT), has recently been developed in order to make this early evaluation easier. We hypothesize that CSCT alteration would also predict HAND, in HIV infected patients. A complete neuropsychological assessment is highly time and personal consuming. This short (approximatively 2 minutes) digital test would be highly helpful to identify patients, who will need a more extensive neuropsychological assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
86

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Nice, France, 06001
        • Hôpital Pasteur 2 - Service de Neurologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients infected with HIV-1

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients infected with HIV-1
  • Patients followed in outpatient service, over 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients infected with HIV-2
  • Patients with difficulty understanding the French language
  • Patients present with progressive opportunistic infection
  • Patients for whom a change of psychotropic treatment was performed in the last 3 weeks
  • Patients with drug and / or alcohol addiction
  • Patients with a history of psychiatric disorder
  • Patients with stroke, endocarditis or meningoencephalitis with severe neurological sequelae

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Absence of cognitive disorder
Other: Classic evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Other: New evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Cognitive Speed Computerized Test (CSCT)
Asymptomatic cognitive disorder
Other: Classic evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Other: New evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Cognitive Speed Computerized Test (CSCT)
Symptomatic cognitive impairment
Other: Classic evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Other: New evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Cognitive Speed Computerized Test (CSCT)
HIV associated dementia
Other: Classic evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Other: New evaluation of neurocognitive functions
Cognitive Speed Computerized Test (CSCT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Speed Computerized Test (CSCT) score
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows the evaluation of the speed of the processing of the information
at patient inclusion
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows the evaluation of the overall cognitive functioning
at patient inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) score
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows to evaluate the concentration capacity
at patient inclusion
Numeric Memory (WAIS-III location and back)
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
short-term memory evaluation and verbal working memory
at patient inclusion
Score RL-RI16
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows the evaluation of episodic and long-term verbal memory
at patient inclusion
Rey figure
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows the evaluation of the long-term capacities of visio-construction (wealth score) and planning
at patient inclusion
TMTB - TMTA Time Score
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
Assessment of Mental Flexibility
at patient inclusion
Verbal fluency test
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows the evaluation of the verbal initiation and verbal language capacities
at patient inclusion
IADL score
Time Frame: at patient inclusion
allows to evaluate the symptomatic character of the disorders
at patient inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16-PP-09

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV-1

Clinical Trials on Classic evaluation of neurocognitive functions

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings