Smartphone Addiction Recovery Coach for Young Adults (SARC-YA) Experiment (SARC-YA)

August 29, 2024 updated by: Michael L. Dennis, Ph.D., Chestnut Health Systems

At discharge from outpatient treatment, researchers will recruit 300 young adults and randomly assign them to recovery support as usual control condition or the Smartphone Addiction Recovery Coach for Young Adults (SARC-YA) experimental condition. Participants in the experimental conditions will receive a smartphone, a calling/texting/data plan, and the SARC-YA mobile applications for the first 6 months post treatment discharge. Experimental participants will 1) complete a 2-3 minute recovery-focused ecological momentary assessment (EMA) at 5 random times a day, receive feedback on their current answers, and provided access to behavioral charting of their past answers over time; and 2) receive continuous access to a suite of self-initiated ecological momentary interventions (EMI) to support their recovery via tool box of coping tools, apps related to getting support, and apps related to maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Data include standardized assessments, urine tests, mobile phone metadata, EMA responses, and EMI utilization. The study's primary aim and hypothesis are:

Aim 1: Test the effects of experimental assignment on the frequency of substance use.

H1 Relative to the control group, participants in the experimental group will have lower scores on the quarterly Substance Frequency Scale (3, 6, 9 months post- discharge).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

At discharge from outpatient treatment, researchers will recruit 300 young adults and randomly assign them to recovery support as usual control condition or the Smartphone Addiction Recovery Coach for Young Adults (SARC-YA) experimental condition. Participants in the experimental conditions will receive a smartphone, a calling/texting/data plan, and the SARC-YA mobile applications for the first 6 months post treatment discharge. Experimental participants will 1) complete a 2-3 minute recovery-focused ecological momentary assessment (EMA) at 5 random times a day, receive feedback on their current answers, and provided access to behavioral charting of their past answers over time; and 2) receive continuous access to a suite of self-initiated ecological momentary interventions (EMI) to support their recovery via tool box of coping tools, apps related to getting support, and apps related to maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Data include standardized assessments, urine tests, mobile phone metadata, EMA responses, and EMI utilization. The study's aims and their associated hypotheses are:

Aim 1: Test the effects of experimental assignment on the frequency of substance use.

H1 Relative to the control group, participants in the experimental group will have lower scores on the quarterly Substance Frequency Scale (3, 6, 9 months post- discharge). Aim 2: Evaluate the extent to which the experimental effects are moderated by baseline substance use frequency. H2 The Substance Frequency Scale Scores at intake will moderate the effects of experimental on the quarterly subsequent Substance Frequency Scale scores. Aim 3: Test the extent to which the frequency of substance use mediates the effects of experimental assignment on other aspects of recovery including SUD symptoms, HIV risk behavior, quality of life, mental wellness, and days of school. H3a Relative to the control group, participants in the experimental group will have better scores on other aspects of recovery (reverse of number of SUD symptoms, reverse of HIV risk behaviors, quality of life, mental wellness, days of school) in the quarterly interviews. H3b Higher Substance Frequency Scale scores (regardless of assignment) in a given quarter will be associated with worse scores on other aspects of recovery in the next quarter. H3c Substance Frequency Scale scores in a given quarter will mediate the impact of the experimental assignment on other aspects of recovery in the next quarter. Aim 4: Within the experimental condition, determine the degree to which EMA responses (e.g., use, withdrawal, craving, negative and positive affect) and EMI utilization predict the duration of abstinence (to be done within experimental condition.) H4a The duration of abstinence will be negatively related to EMA measures of the recency of use, withdrawal, craving, low self-efficacy to resist relapse, increased negative affect, and decreased positive affect. H4b The duration of abstinence will be positively related to immediate and cumulative EMI utilization.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
237

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States, 61701
        • Chestnut Health Systems
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60610
        • Chestnut Health Systems

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. discharge from an adolescent outpatient SUD treatment program to the community;
  2. substance use during the 90 days prior to treatment;

  3. aged 18 to 26 at the time of discharge;

    Exclusion Criteria:

  4. inability to read and communicate in English;
  5. does NOT reside or plan to stay in Chicago during the next 9 months;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Recovery Support as Usual Control
Participants in the control and experimental condition will have access to post treatment recovery support services as usual.
Other: Recovery support as usual
same as arm
Other: Smartphone assisted relapse prevention
same as arm
Other Names:
  • Relapse Prevention
Experimental: Smartphone Addiction Recovery Coach (SARC) - Assisted Relapse Prevention
Participants in the experimental condition will receive a smartphone, a calling/texting/data plan, and the SARC-YA mobile applications for the first 6 months post treatment discharge. Experimental participants will 1) complete a 2-3 minute recovery-focused ecological momentary assessment (EMA) at 5 random times a day, receive feedback on their current answers, and provided access to behavioral charting of their past answers over time; and 2) receive continuous access to a suite of self-initiated ecological momentary interventions (EMI) to support their recovery via tool box of coping tools, apps related to getting support, and apps related to maintaining a healthy lifestyle.
Other: Smartphone assisted relapse prevention
same as arm
Other Names:
  • Relapse Prevention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in GAIN's Substance Frequency Scale from baseline to 6 months (effect of providing the intervention)
Time Frame: 6 month SFS minus baseline SFS
The GAIN's Substance Frequency Scale (SFS; alpha=.85; test-retest rho=.94) ranges from 0 to 100% and is calculated as the average percent of days in the past 90 that adolescents reported alcohol, cannabis, stimulates, opioids, and other substance use, days of heavy substance use, and days of problems from substance use. Thus it incorporates the frequency of use, range of substances used, amount used, and degree to which use is causing problems.
6 month SFS minus baseline SFS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in GAIN's Substance Frequency Scale from 6 to 9 months (effect of withdrawing the intervention)
Time Frame: 9 months SFS minus 6 month SFS
The GAIN's Substance Frequency Scale (SFS; alpha=.85; test-retest rho=.94) ranges from 0 to 100% and is calculated as the average percent of days in the past 90 that adolescents reported alcohol, cannabis, stimulates, opioids, and other substance use, days of heavy substance use, and days of problems from substance use. Thus it incorporates the frequency of use, range of substances used, amount used, and degree to which use is causing problems.
9 months SFS minus 6 month SFS
Change in GAIN Substance Disorder Screener (SDScr) from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 month minus baseline
Count of 5 past 90 day substance use disorder symptoms (alpha=.90) from the GAIN-Q3
6 month minus baseline
Change in GAIN Risk Behavior Screener (RBScr) from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 month minus baseline
Count of 6 past 90 day of HIV risk behaviors (test-retest rho=.80) including needle use, needle sharing, unprotected sex, multiple sexual partners, trading sex, and victimization from the GAIN-Q3
6 month minus baseline
Change in European Quality of Life 5 dimensions (EQ5D) from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 month minus baseline
Count of 6 quality of life items (alpha=.83) from the EQ5D
6 month minus baseline
Change in Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 month minus baseline
Count of 14 items related to mental wellness (alpha=.94) from the MHC-SF
6 month minus baseline
Change in the days of school from baseline to 6 months
Time Frame: 6 month minus baseline
The days of being in school during the past quarter (test-retest rho=.88) from the GAIN-Q3
6 month minus baseline
Duration of abstinence after a given EMA
Time Frame: Measured at 5 random times per day over 6 months in the experimental condition
The duration of abstinence is the time from each completed EMA to the next indication of use - measured in days.
Measured at 5 random times per day over 6 months in the experimental condition

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chestnut Health Systems

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael L Dennis, Ph.D., Chestnut Health Systems

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DA011323-15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

We use standardized measures and have a history of established relationships with several investigators who have had their own funds to conduct secondary analyses or need very limited support and are open to others. For EMA/EMI data from the pilot (and for this study, if funded) we are explicitly collaborating with Dr. Susan Murphy at the University of Michigan in her efforts to develop and evaluate Machine Learning algorithms on how to increase EMI utilization and prevent relapse even more effectively. Our data sharing practices have and will continue to include a mixture of publishing traditional peer-reviewed publications; making forms, reports, and normative tables available via the internet (or by request); providing analytic runs upon request; collaborating with other researchers; and providing copies of the de-identified data sets to eligible researchers. The later require data sharing agreements and commitments not to attempt re-identification.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on Recovery support as usual

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings