Optimizing Patient Experience During Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (OPTIMIZE)

August 20, 2025 updated by: Tilburg University

The present study focusses on the effects of the diagnostic testing environment on psychological wellbeing, cardiac symptoms and patient satisfaction during cardiac stress testing (CST) in patients who are referred to the Institute Verbeeten for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

The diagnostic procedure consists of two days of MPI using SPECT: day 1 of MPI involves obtaining a resting image and day 2 (typically 3 or 4 days later) a stress MPI following exercise or pharmacological challenge with adenosine. The diagnostic procedure can result in undesirable effects on psychological wellbeing, such as anxiety or psychological distress. These effects can be related to anticipatory anxiety (day 1 of MPI) and/or responses to the exercise or adenosine stress testing (day 2 of MPI). The present investigation aims to develop methods to further improve patients' experiences and wellbeing during the diagnostic process for the presence of inducible myocardial ischemia.

This research project will compare four groups to establish the effect of providing information and supportive coaching: (1) care as usual, (2) information support using video materials, (3) supportive coaching during the diagnostic testing procedure, and (4) a combination of both interventions. The video-based information and supportive coaching are aimed at reducing feelings of anxiety, uncertainty and psychological distress during the diagnostic testing procedure. In addition to standardized self-report questionnaires, this project will utilize facial expression analysis software to measure emotional states during CST as well as 24- hour ambulatory assessments to evaluate autonomic nervous system activity, cardiac symptoms and psychological wellbeing during everyday life activities in the period between the two days of MPI. It is hypothesized that additional video-based information and supportive coaching during the diagnostic process for the inducibility of myocardial ischemia will result in improved psychological wellbeing (reduced acute negative emotions; primary outcome) as well as less cardiac and other physical symptoms and improved patient satisfaction (secondary outcomes) of the diagnostic clinic visit. The innovative aspect of the present proposal is its focus on emotional expression during evaluation for myocardial ischemia using FaceReader software in combination with self-reported momentary mood and perceived stress assessments. Knowledge about the interaction between psychological wellbeing and cardiac function obtained in this project will strengthen the development of future interventions aimed to reduce symptom burden and psychological distress in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluations for heart disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

149

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Brabant
      • Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands, 5042 SB
        • Institute Verbeeten

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • referred to the Institute Verbeeten Tilburg and eligible for adenosine-exercise SPECT MPI
  • capable of answering questionnaires and receiving information and coaching in Dutch.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a life-threatening disease with < 1 year survival (e.g., metastatic cancer)
  • refusal to informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Care as usual
Patients in this group will not receive any additional information materials or support on top of care as usual, but information videos will be made available after completion of the MPI procedures.
Experimental: Care as usual with information support
Patients in this group will primarily receive additional information on the diagnostic process that they will go through with the use of video materials. Supportive coaching will not be provided in this group.
Comprises of additional visual information in the form of two videos that show details about the procedure on both days of the MPI diagnostic procedure. Each of these two videos are approximately 5 minutes long and are made available to the patients before the first day (video 1), and in between the first and second day (video 2).
Experimental: Care as usual with supportive coaching
Patients in this group will receive supportive coaching throughout their clinic visit. The coach is available for questions as well as specific support for each patient. Information support using video materials will not be supplied to the patients during the diagnostic process in this group, but will be made available after completion of the MPI procedures.
Patients receive coaching from one person who is present throughout the complete diagnostic process. The coach is available for answering questions as well as comforting the patients when necessary (e.g., to reassure patients if they are anxious or stressed).
Experimental: Care as usual with information support and supportive coaching
Patients in this group will receive both information support as well as supportive coaching during their diagnostic clinic visit.
This intervention comprises additional visual information in the form of two videos and coaching throughout the diagnostic process as described above.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological wellbeing - self report using Profile of Mood States
Time Frame: During the two day diagnostic process.
Will be assessed using self-report measures of emotional states on a scale from 0 to 10 (stressed, anxious, insecure, relaxed, worried, irritated, excited, and tired) with a higher score representing more of this emotional state.These measures of psychological well-being will be compared between the four groups.
During the two day diagnostic process.
Psychological wellbeing - Facial expressions of emotions
Time Frame: During the stress test on day 2.
Will be assessed using facial expression of emotions based on video recordings during the diagnostic testing procedure. Facial expressions will be analyzed (valence and intensity; e.g., anxiety) using FaceReader software as in our prior METC-approved research projects at Institute Verbeeten. A value between 0 and 1 will be the outcome measure for each emotion (happy, sad, angry, surprised, scared, disgusted and neutral). These measures of psychological well-being will be compared between the four groups.
During the stress test on day 2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac symptoms
Time Frame: During the two day diagnostic process.
The intensity of cardiac symptoms and other common symptoms during MPI SPECT (e.g., headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea) will be assessed using self-report measures on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores represent a higher intensity of the symptoms.
During the two day diagnostic process.
Patient experience - PSQ-18
Time Frame: At the end of the two day diagnostic process.
Patient experience and satisfaction of the clinic visit, cardiac tests, and coaching will be assessed using a validated questionnaire with a higher score representing a better patient experience.
At the end of the two day diagnostic process.
Physiological measures - heart rate
Time Frame: During the cardiac stress test on the second day of the diagnostic process.
During the cardiac stress test, heart rate is routinely collected. This data will be used as a physiological measure that is relevant to emotional experiences, cardiac symptoms, and the inducibility of myocardial ischemia.
During the cardiac stress test on the second day of the diagnostic process.
Physiological measure - blood pressure
Time Frame: During the cardiac stress test on the second day of the diagnostic process.
During the cardiac stress test, blood pressure is routinely collected. This data will be used as a physiological measure that is relevant to emotional experiences, cardiac symptoms, and the inducibility of myocardial ischemia.
During the cardiac stress test on the second day of the diagnostic process.
Ambulatory ECG monitoring
Time Frame: For 24 hours between the first and second day of the diagnostic process.
A 24-hour Holter-ECG will be used to assess heart rate variability during everyday life activities. These assessments are obtained out-of-clinic during the day between the resting and stress MPI SPECT assessment.
For 24 hours between the first and second day of the diagnostic process.
SPECT images
Time Frame: At the end of the first and second day of the diagnostic process.
As part of the patient's clinical care, single-photon emission computed tomography will be used to obtain myocardial perfusion images on the rest and cardiac stress test days. The presence or absence of ischemia can be evaluated based on these images.
At the end of the first and second day of the diagnostic process.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Care as usual with information support

Subscribe