6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
Use of 6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Cutaneous Wound Closure: a Randomized Evaluator Blind Split Wound Comparative Effectiveness Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of 6-0 fast absorbing gut during repair of linear cutaneous surgery wounds on the face or neck improves scar cosmesis compared to wound closure with 5-0 fast absorbing gut. The investigator will use a split wound model, where half of the wound is repaired with 6-0 fast absorbing gut and the other half is repaired with 5-0 fast absorbing gut. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be measured via the patient observer scar assessment scale, a validated scar instrument. The scar width, and adverse events will also be recorded.
This study aims to investigate whether 5-0 versus 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture leads to better surgical wound cosmesis on the head and neck. The 5-0 fast absorbing gut suture has a large diameter, and therefore greater tensile strength. The greater tensile strength would provide better support of the healing scar during the first 5-7 days after surgery and for this reason, could potentially lead to improved scar cosmesis. However, the greater diameter could also lead to track marks that are larger and more visible. Furthermore, fast absorbing gut has a high degree of tissue reactivity to begin with, and it is known that larger diameter sutures generate more tissue reactivity compared to smaller diameter sutures of the same material; therefore, it is also possible that the 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture would provide better scar cosmesis by virtue of its lower tissue reactivity3,4.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Able to give informed consent themselves
- Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the head and neck with predicted primary closure
- Willing to return for follow up visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mentally handicapped
- Unable to understand written and oral English
- Incarceration
- Under 18 years of age
- Pregnant Women
- Wounds with predicted closure length less than 3 cm
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture
6-0 fast absorbing gut used to suture wound
|
Fast absorbing surgical gut suture is a strand of collagenous material, size 6-0
|
|
Experimental: 5-0 fast absorbing gut suture
5-0 fast absorbing gut used to suture wound
|
Fast absorbing surgical gut suture is a strand of collagenous material, size 5-0
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Scar Assessment
Time Frame: 3 months following the procedure
|
The primary endpoint will be the score of two blinded reviewers using the patient observer scar assessment score at a three-month assessment visit.
|
3 months following the procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Width of the Scar
Time Frame: 3 months following the procedure
|
The secondary endpoints will include the width of the scar 1 cm from midline on each side at the follow-up visit and any complications from the treatment.
|
3 months following the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel Eisen, MD, University of California, Davis
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ. A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010 Dec;12(6):296-302. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2010.538413.
- Hochberg J, Meyer KM, Marion MD. Suture choice and other methods of skin closure. Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;89(3):627-41. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.001.
- Gabrielli F, Potenza C, Puddu P, Sera F, Masini C, Abeni D. Suture materials and other factors associated with tissue reactivity, infection, and wound dehiscence among plastic surgery outpatients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jan;107(1):38-45. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00007.
- van Rijssel EJ, Brand R, Admiraal C, Smit I, Trimbos JB. Tissue reaction and surgical knots: the effect of suture size, knot configuration, and knot volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;74(1):64-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 902404
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Cosmesis
-
NCT05977816RecruitingWound Infection | Cosmesis | Wound Surgical
-
NCT06025253RecruitingWound Infection | Cosmesis | Wound Surgical
-
NCT03871023UnknownWound Infection; Wounds; Dehisence; Cosmesis; Home Care; Length of Hospital Stay
-
NCT01938586Completed
-
NCT03716687TerminatedSurgical Wound | Surgical Site Infection | Wound Dehiscence, Surgical | Dehiscence of Internal Surgical Wound
-
NCT03330041CompletedCutaneous Sutures and Scar Cosmesis
-
NCT05805046WithdrawnSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related Wound | Dehiscence Wound | Surgical Wound Leak
-
NCT05716490Active, not recruitingSurgical Wound | Surgical Wound Infection | Surgical Site Infection | Surgical Wound, Healed | Surgical Complication | Surgical Wound Dehiscence | Surgical Wound Haemorrhage
-
NCT04894604Not yet recruitingSurgical Wound | Surgical Incision | Surgical Wound Dehiscence | Incision, Surgical | Surgical Wound, Recent
-
NCT07459855Recruiting
Clinical Trials on 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture
-
NCT04585217CompletedPtosis, Eyelid | Dermatochalasis
-
NCT03330041CompletedCutaneous Sutures and Scar Cosmesis
-
NCT05408117Recruiting
-
NCT02547077CompletedUse of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound ClosureWound Closure Techniques
-
NCT01298167CompletedBasal Cell Carcinoma | Squamous Cell Carcinoma
-
NCT07127029CompletedSuture | Dermatology | Suture Dermatologic | Closure Technique | Mohs Micrographic Surgery | Absorbable, Coated Sutures | Suture Techniques
-
NCT00292513UnknownCyst of Face, Neck or Shoulder | Pilomatrixoma of Face, Neck or Shoulder
-
NCT00681070Completed