Absorbable Suture Versus Tissue Glue to Repair Defects Following Mohs Surgery

Fast Absorbing Gut Suture Versus Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive in the Epidermal Closure of Linear Repairs Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery

The purpose of the study is to look at which nonpermanent superficial closure method, cyanoacrylate tissue glue or fast absorbing gut suture, leads to a better cosmetic and functional outcome in repairs of facial wounds after Mohs surgery.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Basal Cell Carcinoma; Squamous Cell Carcinoma
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut

Detailed Description

Cyanoacrylate is a rapidly polymerizing topical adhesive commonly used as an alternative to traditional sutures. Both cyanoacrylate and fast absorbing gut suture eliminate the need for suture removal which can represent a significant savings in patient and staff time as well as related healthcare resources. Both cyanoacrylate and fast absorbing gut suture are currently routinely used for epidermal closure at Yale following Mohs micrographic surgery. Physician preference currently dictates which epidermal closure method is chosen for a given surgery.

Cyanoacrylate has been reported to decrease trauma to the epidermal edges, minimize suture tract marks in surgical scars, and decrease the risk of inflammatory reaction to suture material. Cyanoacrylate, however, does not allow for wound eversion.

Wound eversion minimizes the risk of a depressed scar from tissue contraction during healing. As with all sutures, fast absorbing gut suture allows for wound eversion which is reported to maximize the likelihood of a good epidermal approximation. On the other hand, fast absorbing gut suture degrades by proteolysis which can result in an inflammatory reaction. Any inflammatory reaction on the skin while healing can affect the final cosmetic outcome (ie. post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation).

A recent article (Tierney 2009), reported that tissue adhesive may not be as effective in achieving optimal cosmesis as fast absorbing gut for defects on the trunk and extremities. However, we would like to study these two methods for the repair of facial wounds, which are in low tension areas as compared to trunk and extremities. Therefore, it is unknown exactly which of these two method is better than the other in epidermal closure of facial wounds follow Mohs micrographic surgery.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 14
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Connecticut
    • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
      • Yale Dermatologic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• The subject is willing and able to give informed consent.
• The subject is willing and able to participate in the study as an outpatient and is willing to comply with study requirements.
• The subject is 18 years of age or older.
• The subject has a diagnosis of a non-melanoma skin cancer on the face requiring Mohs micrographic surgery.
• The subjects also has a final wound length of 3cm or greater.
• The subject is able to abide by the protocol of standard postoperative care and is able to attend standard post-operative visits at 3 months after the surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The subject is on systemic immunosuppressants and/or is an organ transplant recipients.
• The subject has reported or suspected hypersensitivity to cyanoacrylate or fast absorbing gut suture.
• The subject has a dermatologic disease in the target site that may interfere with examination.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cyanoacrylate Superior/Inferior; This arm contains data from only the Cyanoacrylate used on superior ½ of wounds & inferior ½ of wounds in randomized patients to determine the impact of Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast Absorbing Gut suture.	Device: Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut; All wounds will be closed using a linear, bilayered closure method, where the buried intradermal absorbing suture (5-0, Polysorb) will be placed along the length of the incision, consistent with standard surgical procedure. Only patients with wounds with a length of 3cm or greater will be enrolled. Each wound will be measured, and the length divided in half. Half of the surgical wound will be randomly selected (by coin toss) for epidermal reapproximation with cyanoacrylate, whereas the other half will be repaired with 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture in standard running fashion.
Active Comparator: Fast Absorbing Gut Suture Superior/Inferior; This arm contains data from only the Fast Absorbing Gut Suture used on superior ½ of wounds & inferior ½ of wounds in randomized patients to determine the impact of Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut suture.	Device: Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut; All wounds will be closed using a linear, bilayered closure method, where the buried intradermal absorbing suture (5-0, Polysorb) will be placed along the length of the incision, consistent with standard surgical procedure. Only patients with wounds with a length of 3cm or greater will be enrolled. Each wound will be measured, and the length divided in half. Half of the surgical wound will be randomly selected (by coin toss) for epidermal reapproximation with cyanoacrylate, whereas the other half will be repaired with 6-0 fast absorbing gut suture in standard running fashion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)	The Visual Analog or Analogue Scale (VAS)* is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to their feeling. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The scale is interpreted as the greater the scale score (as the score approaches 10), the greater the cosmetic and functional outcome of the healed wound.; Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 62, 989 - 993; Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 83 - 102; Hayes, M. H. S. & D. G. Patterson (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 98-99	3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Yale University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: David Leffell, MD, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kim J, Singh Maan H, Cool AJ, Hanlon AM, Leffell DJ. Fast Absorbing Gut Suture versus Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive in the Epidermal Closure of Linear Repairs Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015 Feb;8(2):24-9.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: February 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2011
• Study Completion (Actual): August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 15, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 15, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): February 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): November 9, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 10, 2012
• Last Verified: October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cyanoacrylate; Fast Absorbing Gut; Mohs Surgery; Epidermal closure method
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms, Basal Cell; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Basal Cell
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1101007845