Prebiotic Supplementation and Intestinal Barrier Function in Elderly: a RCT

August 21, 2018 updated by: Robert Brummer, Örebro University, Sweden

The Influence of Prebiotic Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier Function in Elderly: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

The investigators aim was to assess whether 6 weeks of oral intake of the wheat-derived prebiotic fiber arabinoxylan or oat-derived beta-glucan could improve intestinal barrier function against drug-induced barrier disruption in a general population of elderly people, in a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study consisted of a 9 week clinical trial to which the study participants orally ingested two different prebiotic compounds/one placebo for a total of 6 weeks.

The primary outcome was intestinal permeability which was measured before/after indomethacin intake before starting with the prebiotic supplementation and repeated 6 weeks afterwards.

Indomethacin is an NSAID known to artificially increase the intestinal permeability. The prebiotic fibers arabinoxylan and oat-derived beta-glucan have not been investigated for their effect on intestinal permeability in older adults.

Intestinal permeability was investigated using the multi-sugar permeability test. Participants ingested a water solution containing 5 sugar probes that are taken up in different parts of the gut. These sugars are later recovered in the urine at two different time points, reflecting gastroduodenal, small intestinal and colonic permeability.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Örebro, Sweden, 701 82
        • Örebro University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent signed by study participant
  • Age ≥ 55 years
  • Mentally and physically fit to complete questionnaires during the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or genic gastrointestinal disease, with strictures, malignance's and ischemia.
  • Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)
  • Participation in other clinical trials in the past three months.
  • Intake of medications know to change the inflammatory status (i.e proton pump inhibitors, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory medication (including NSAIDs)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Maltodextrin 12 gram used as placebo
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Maltodextrin as placebo
Active Comparator: Naxus
Naxus contains the wheat-derived prebiotic fibre Arabinoxylan
Dietary supplement: Naxus
Non-digestible polysaccharides arabinoxylan (Naxus)
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Active Comparator: Oatwell
Oatwell contains an oat-derived prebiotic beta-glucan fibre
Dietary supplement: Oatwell
Non-digestible polysaccharides oat beta-glucan (Oatwell)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in delta indomethacin challenged permeability at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
In vivo multi-sugar permeability test
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in faecal microbiota composition at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
16S rRNA-based sequencing
6 weeks
Changes in cytokine levels at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Multiplex assay for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-2, IL-12p70, IFN-γ and TNF-α
6 weeks
Changes in reactive oxygen species levels at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
FORT test for hydrogen peroxide
6 weeks
Changes in gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire scores at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS) evaluates gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms based on the 5 domains diarrhoea, constipation, reflux, indigestion and abdominal pain. The symptoms are assessed with 15 items, ranging in scores 1 to 7 depending on their severity. A score of 1 represents "no problems" and score 7 represents "severe problems". The severity of symptoms may be defined as no problems (1 point), mild (1-2 points), moderate (2-4 points), and severe (4-7 points). The scores for each domain was calculated as the mean score of each corresponding item while the mean total GSRS score reflects the general severity of GI symptoms.
6 weeks
Changes in hospital and anxiety depression scores at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to evaluate the psychological distress of study participants.This questionnaire consists of 14 items subdivided in two subscales for the assessment of anxiety or depression. The total score is used as a measure of general psychological distress. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 21. A score > 8 on respective subscales indicates a significant level of anxiety or depression.
6 weeks
Changes in perceived stress scale scores at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The perceived stress scale (PSS) consists of 10 items, including a number of direct questions about current levels of experienced stress. The respondent answers how often a certain emotion has been present during the past month. PSS scores are obtained by reversing responses (e.g., 0 = 4, 1 = 3, 2 = 2, 3 = 1 & 4 = 0) to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7, & 8) and then summing across all scale items. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from never (0) to almost always (4). The questions in this scale ask about the responders feelings and thoughts during the last month. In each case the questionnaire requires the respondent to indicate by circling how often they felt or thought a certain way.
6 weeks
Changes in quality of life questionnaire scores at end of intervention period
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) tool consists of two parts; 5Q-5D, which includes 5 items related to wellbeing and function (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression) and the visual analogue scale, 5Q-5D-VAS, ranging from 0 to 100.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Örebro University, Sweden

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fibebiotics consortium (EU)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 12, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 18, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 18, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 21, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FIT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aged

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings