" Sweeper " and Epiretinal Membrane Surgery (SWEEPING)

October 8, 2024 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Observational Prospective Monocentric Study Evaluating "Sweeper" Use During Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a pathological phenomenon requiring surgery when vision is altered.

ERM surgery requires ERM peeling, then active internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling if it is not spontaneously peeled with ERM. Initiation of peeling is very delicate and can lead to micro scotoma when realized with microscopic forceps. The Sweeper is a microscopic tool with a soft silicon tip covered with diamond dust which allows peeling initiation without retina prehension. It may reduce retinal trauma and visual sequelae.

Purpose of our study is to evaluate use of sweeper during 20 ERM surgeries. The investigator will compare microperimetry before surgery versus those after 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3), and measure difference of number and depths of micro scotoma.

The investigator will note: number of forceps uses if sweeper is inefficient and all areas of sweeper use to correlate them with micro scotoma.

The investigator will evaluate visual and optical coherence tomography improvement after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a pathological phenomenon that leads to visual loss, visual distortions, central scotoma, and diplopia. No medical treatment is yet available.

ERM surgery requires separation of normal retina and epiretinal membrane. After epiretinal peeling, if internal limiting membrane (ILM) is not spontaneously peeled with ERM, surgeon peels ILM from retina (also named active peeling). Initiation of peeling is very accurate and delicate. Either microscopic forceps or sweeper are used to initiate peeling. Sweeper is a microscopic tool with a soft silicon tip covered with diamond dust which allows peeling initiation without retina prehension. It may reduce retinal trauma and visual sequelae.

ILM active peeling reduces recurrence of ERM and rate of repeat surgery. No visual acuity loss has been found. But 2 studies show increase of micro scotoma at micro-perimetry after active ILM peeling with forceps.

Purpose of our study is to evaluate use of sweeper during 20 ERM surgeries. The investigator will compare microperimetry before surgery versus those after 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3), and measure difference of number and depths of micro scotoma.

The investigator will note: number of forceps uses if sweeper is inefficient, all areas of sweeper use to correlate them with micro scotoma.

The investigator will evaluate visual and optical coherence tomography improvement after surgery.

Our study doesn't include any intervention while surgeries would be realized with or without study participation. Examinations are non-invasive, usual, and done during usual medical visit without additional visit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

9

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Loire-Atlantique
      • Nantes, Loire-Atlantique, France, 44000
        • Nantes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population concerned corresponds to the major patients consulting in the ophthalmology department at the Nantes University Hospital and presenting an epiretinal membrane and an operative indication.

Patients will be included at the epiretinal membrane surgery programming consultation. No inclusion will be made as part of the emergency.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • consent,
  • adult patient,
  • Epiretinal membrane

Exclusion Criteria:

  • perimetry impossible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference of number and depth of micro scotoma before and after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery with sweeper
Time Frame: microperimetry at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)
microperimetry at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy of sweeper mesured by number of forceps uses if sweeper is inefficient
Time Frame: Day of surgery
Day of surgery
Visual improvement measured by visual acuity and optical coherence tomography improvement after surgery , visual acuity and OCT morphometry before surgery, M1 and M3
Time Frame: at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)
at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) improvement after surgery measured by OCT morphometry
Time Frame: at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)
at baseline, then 1 month after surgery (M1), then 3 months after (M3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Baptiste Ducloyer, Dr, Nantes University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC17_0295

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epiretinal Membrane

Clinical Trials on Non interventional study

Search Similar Trials