Change in Symptom Clusters in HNC Patients

November 22, 2017 updated by: Chia-Chin Lin, Taipei Medical University

Change in Symptom Clusters in HNC Patients Undergoing Postoperative Radiotherapy: A Longitudinal Study

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, causing more than 379,000 deaths in 2015 notwithstanding the breakthrough in cancer screening and medical treatment. The primary treatment for HNC is a combination of surgery and radiotherapy, either delivered preoperatively or postoperatively. Although these treatments, especially the postoperative radiotherapy can greatly improve the survival of patients, they still have to pay a high price for numerous symptoms induced by radiation. On the other hand, research on symptoms clusters is an emerging field in oncology which aims to understand the complexity of multiple symptoms experienced by cancer patients. A thorough understanding of symptom clusters help informs the development of comprehensive care plans which target a group of symptoms that is likely to coexist, thus easing the total symptom burden in cancer patients.To date, there has been a paucity of evidence regarding symptom clusters of HNC. To address the gap in existing literature, this study described the symptom clusters among HNC patients who were treated with surgery with a combination of postoperative radiotherapy. In addition, a longitudinal approach was employed to examine the change in symptom clusters throughout the treatment course.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Head and neck cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiotherapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed with HNC,
  • Aged older than 18 years,
  • Without receiving any radiotherapy prior to surgery,
  • No cognitive impairment and able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese

Exclusion Criteria:

- Undergoing any concurrent treatment for cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with head and neck cancer
No intervention was provided. The patients were only asked to complete a set of questionnaire at baseline, and week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 after starting of postoperative radiotherapy.
Other: complete questionnaire
Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire at baseline, and week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 after starting of radiotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 6 months after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
6 months after radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: baseline
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
baseline
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 1 month after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
1 month after radiotherapy
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 2 months after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
2 months after radiotherapy
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 3 months after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
3 months after radiotherapy
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 4 months after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
4 months after radiotherapy
treatment-related symptoms of head and neck cancer patients with post-operative radiotherapy assessed by the Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory
Time Frame: 5 months after radiotherapy
The Taiwanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory is designed to assess the severity of 13 symptoms that are most commonly reported by patients undergoing cancer treatment. The symptoms include dry mouth, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, drowsiness, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath, numbness, difficulty remembering, distress and sadness. Participants in this study were asked to rate the severity of these symptoms on a 11-point Likert scale, with "0" representing "not present "and "10" representing "as bad as you can imagine". The item scores of 1 - 4, 5 - 6 and 7 - 10 are considered as mild, moderate and severe, respectively. The composite score can be obtained by averaging the 13 item scores.
5 months after radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Taipei Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HKU_2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings