E6/E7 mRNA Performance to Detect HSIL and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of This Screening Strategy in HIV + MSM (ELAVI-67)

December 5, 2017 updated by: Daniel Podzamczer Palter, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Performance of E6/E7 mRNA to Detect Anal High-Grade Intraepithelial Lesions and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a New Screening Strategy for Anal Cancer in HIV Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men

This study evaluates the positive and negative predictive value of E6/E7 mRNA expression for anal HSIL and its capacity to predict incident HSIL in HIV + MSM. We also analyse the cost-effectiveness of this new screening strategy. It is an ambispective study with 355 participants and a follow-up period of 2 to 5 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Introduction: Anal cancer incidence is increasing in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM). There are still no standardized criteria for anal cancer screening. Anal cytology has not shown enough sensitivity and specificity in the selection of patients who need more invasive procedures, as high resolution anoscopy (HRA). Human Papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 oncogenes deregulation is a crucial factor in neoplasic lesions progression.

Objectives: 1)To assess the negative and positive predictive value of E6/E7 mRNA expression for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and its capacity to predict the incidence of new HSIL during the follow-up 2)To analyze the cost-effectiveness of E6/E7 as a new screening strategy for anal cancer compared with usual strategies (cytology and DNA detection).

Methodology: Ambispective longitudinal study. Participants: HIV MSM from the outpatients HIV and STD Unit of Bellvitge Hospital. We include patients visited within the usual outpatient practice since January 2015 with a cytology stored following the Hospital protocol, as well as patients collected prospectively since January 2017. This methodological approach will let to reduce the time of inclusion and maximize follow-up time. Sample size calculated: 355 participants. Follow-up period: 2 to 5 years. At each visit an anal smear for cytology, HPV DNA detection (by Linear Array and Hybrid Capture) and E6/E7 mRNA expression and a HRA with biopsy of suspicious areas of dysplasia will be performed. The analysis of cost-effectiveness will be made with a Markov model that projects long-term cost and effectiveness for both strategies, the E6/E7 and conventional cytology plus detection of High Risk HPV.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
355

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Barcelona
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult HIV-infected MSM visited in the HIV Unit of Bellvitge's University Hospital and underwent routine anal cancer screening.

Retrospective participants: patients attended between January 2015 and December 2016 and with part of the anal smear sample stored.

Prospective participants: patients who start anal cancer screening during the inclusion period.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men who have sex with men >= 18 years
  • HIV documented infection
  • Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of anal cancer.
  • Treatment of anal intraepithelial lesions the 5 years before study inclusion.
  • Suspect infiltrating anal cancer, requiring exploration under anesthesia and surgical removal for histological confirmation.
  • History of diffuse ano-genital condylomatous disease the 5 years before study inclusion or presence at first visit.
  • Other factors that could prevent correct diagnosis and monitoring of the anal dysplastic lesions (test intolerance, proctological pathology that does not allow HRA, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine the predictive value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA for the detection of HSIL and its ability to predict incident cases.
Time Frame: 2-5 years
Determination of HPV E6/E7 ARNm in anal samples of 355 HIV + MSM. Correlation of the detection of HPV E6/E7 ARNm with the diagnosis of HSIL in this patients performing anal cytology an HRA at the first visit and during the follow-up.
2-5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an anal cancer screening strategy based on HPV E6/E7 mRNA analysis.
Time Frame: 2-5 years
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an anal cancer screening strategy based on the selection of candidates for HRA according to the expression of the E6 / E7 mRNA, compared to the usual strategy based on cytology and DNA HPV detection.
2-5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Podzamczer Palter, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 11, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 5, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PR076/17
  • PI16/01056 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings