Modeling Mood Course to Detect Markers of Effective Adaptive Interventions

June 24, 2020 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
The goal of this study is to learn how to engage individuals with bipolar disorder in long-term monitoring of daily patterns of mood, stress, sleep, circadian rhythm, and medical adherence. Knowledge gained will be used to develop a mobile health platform for the translation of a psychosocial intervention for bipolar disorder into an effective adaptive intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Bipolar disorder is a chronic illness of profound shifts in mood ranging from mania to depression. Bipolar disorder is successfully treated by combining medication with psychosocial therapy, but care can prove inadequate in practice. With gaps in coverage and medication, along with imprecise guidelines on when, where, and how to intervene, promising psychosocial therapies require adaptive strategies to better address the specific needs of individuals in a timely manner. To accomplish this, however, requires evidence-based practices for adapting a psychosocial therapy. The long-term goal of this study is to address this knowledge gap, by establishing a mobile health platform for translating a psychosocial therapy in bipolar disorder into an effective adaptive intervention.

An important first step and the specific goal of this study is to answer the question of how to engage individuals with bipolar disorder in long-term monitoring of their daily patterns of mood, stress, sleep, circadian rhythm, and medical adherence. To answer this question, individuals with bipolar disorder will interact with a smart-phone application and activity tracker over six weeks. Individuals will record their symptoms twice-daily with the smart-phone application while activity, sleep, and heart rate are recorded with their activity tracker. In addition, individuals will be interviewed on a weekly basis. The study focuses on testing three engagement strategies: using activity trackers rather than self-reports; reviewing recorded symptoms with another person on a weekly basis; and synthesizing a person's data into charts and graphs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48105
        • University of Michigan
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder
  • Individuals with a smart-phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: No weekly review
Individuals will not review self-report and activity tracker data with an interviewer on a weekly basis over the phone.
Other: No weekly review
An interviewer will not review self-report symptoms and patterns collected from an activity tracker.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Weekly review
Individuals will review self-report and activity tracker data with an interviewer on a weekly basis over the phone.
Behavioral: Weekly review
Each week in the study, an interviewer will review manic and depressive symptoms self-reported by a participant and patterns of activity, sleep, and heart rate collected by the participant's activity tracker.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Who Report They Are More Likely to Use a Smart-phone App Over an Activity Tracker to Monitor Their Symptoms
Time Frame: Study end (6 weeks)
Likelihood of using app over activity tracker is measured using a survey designed specifically for this study to evaluate participant engagement in monitoring symptoms. The relevant question asks 'Which are you more likely to use to monitor your symptoms' and has two mutually-exclusive options for an answer: 'An activity tracker' or 'A smart-phone app'. Engagement survey is conducted over the phone by an interviewer.
Study end (6 weeks)
Average Proportion of Study Days With At Least 50% Completion of Daily Self-Reports Questions
Time Frame: Study end (6 weeks)

For each individual, adherence rate for self-reporting symptoms is measured/defined as the proportion of study days with at least 50% completion of of daily self-reports questions (i.e. 6 questions completed out of a total of 12).

This measure is the average adherence rate for individuals in each of the two intervention arms: individuals who review their data with an interviewer ('Weekly review' arm) vs those who do not review their data with an interviewer ('No weekly review' arm).
Study end (6 weeks)
Average Proportion of Study Days With At Least 12 Hours of Activity Tracking
Time Frame: Study end (6 weeks)

For each individual, adherence rate for activity tracking is measured as the proportion of study days with at least 12 hours of activity tracking.

This measure is the average adherence rates among individuals in either arm: individuals who review their data weekly with an interviewer ('Weekly review' arm) compared to individuals who do not review their data weekly with an interviewer ('No weekly review' arm)
Study end (6 weeks)
Proportion of Participants Who Have Higher Adherence Rates for Self-reporting Symptoms Than Adherence Rates for Activity Tracking
Time Frame: Study end (6 weeks)
For each individual, adherence rate for activity tracking is measured as the proportion of study days with at least 12 hours of activity tracking, whereas adherence rate for self-reporting symptoms is measured as the proportion of study days with at least 50% of daily self-reports survey questions completed.
Study end (6 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change From Baseline in Severity of Manic Symptoms, as Measured With the Young Mania Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, study end (6 weeks)
The Young Mania Rating Scale consists of clinician-rated 11 items to evaluate symptoms of mania, such as elevated mood, energy, and irritability. Item scores are added together to get a total score, ranging from 0 to 60. A higher score indicates more severe manic symptoms.
Baseline, study end (6 weeks)
Average Change From Baseline in Severity of Depressive Symptoms, as Measured With the 17-item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, study end (6 weeks)
The 17-Item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression consists of 17 clinician-rated items to evaluate symptoms of depression, such as guilt, fatigue, and depressed mood. Item scores are summed to get a total score, ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Baseline, study end (6 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of Michigan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Amy L Cochran, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • K01MH112876 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • HUM00126732 (Other Identifier: University of Michigan)
  • 2017-1322 (Other Identifier: University of Wisconsin)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bipolar Disorder

Clinical Trials on No weekly review

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings