Clinical Evaluation for Sarcoma Originated From Bone (CESOFB)

November 10, 2018 updated by: Peking University People's Hospital
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are insensitive in evaluating primary sarcoma originated from bone treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapy, which did not have the definition of measurement methods either. This study evaluates whether clinical imaging findings of sarcoma after preoperative chemotherapy correlate with tumor responses by pathological evaluation by Huvos classifications and develops reliable, quantitative, clinical response criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

A total of 1570 lesions were evaluated by clinical imaging including X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scan or PET/CT preoperatively treated with chemotherapy. All patients had surgery in our center and get pathological evaluation by tumor necrosis rate. Statistical diversity analysis was performed by different pathological groups and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves，ROC were done to find the dividing clinical parameters (Cut-off values) to distinguish different pathological groups.The cut-off values of change rate of maximum diameters of tumor located in extremities were 86%, 50.7% and 0.02% for Huvos Ⅳ,Ⅲ,ⅡandⅠgroups. The differentiation was not obvious using bone scan to distinguish different pathological responses. And the cut-off value for SUVmax value for Huvos Ⅲ,ⅡandⅠgroups were 60.7% and 31.4%.After Multidisciplinary discussion in multiple sites of China, we finally designed a evaluation system based on our data. This study is desgined to prospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of this Clinical evaluation of primary sarcoma originated from bone with other clinical evaluation system,such as RECIST 1.1, Choi and PERCIST.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • Recruiting
        • Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital
      • Xi'an, China
        • Recruiting
        • Xijing Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Zhen Wang, M.D.
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Zhaoming Ye, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Zhaoming Ye, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Biopsy proved high-grade osteosarcoma, who could follow routine chemo-protocol for osteosarcoma, could get enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) histologically confirmed high-grade osteosarcoma;
  • 2) initially treated in Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital, Xijing Hospital or The Second Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang Hospital;
  • 3) imaging evaluation should be available;
  • 4) completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and at least 8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy;
  • 5) expected to live longer than 3 months with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1;
  • 6) acceptable hematologic, hepatic, and renal function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Patients who could not complete neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or at least 4-month adjuvant chemotherapy;
  • 2) lost to follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: 12 months
Sensitivity is defined as the true right clinical evaluated number/ the pathological evaluated number by different classification system.
12 months
Specificity
Time Frame: 12 months
Specificity is defined as the true wrong clincial evuluated number /the pathological evaluated number by different classification system.
12 months
Pathological response rate
Time Frame: 12 months
tumor necrosis rate descripted by Huvos
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
progression-free survival
Time Frame: 24 months
Progression-free survival is defined as time from diagnosis to the first occurrence of progression of disease or death from any cause
24 months
overall survival
Time Frame: 60 months
overall survival is defined as time from diagnosis to death from any cause.
60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University People's Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xijing Hospital
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wei Guo, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CBTRA-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Survival

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings