A Phase II Trial of Cisplatin-Docetaxel Induction Plus Concurrent 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy and Weekly Chemotherapy (TAXCIS)

December 12, 2017 updated by: Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Cisplatin-Docetaxel Induction Plus Concurrent 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy and Weekly Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Phase II Trial

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) is the standard of care for unresectable locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimal combination remains unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 2 induction chemotherapy cycles (days 1 and 22) with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 followed by concurrent chemotherapy (weekly docetaxel-cisplatin, 20 mg/m2) and 3-D conformal radiotherapy for 6 weeks (66 Gy/5 fractions per week/2 Gy per fraction). ). The primary endpoint is the response rate. Secondary objectives are toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Lung cancer is the most common malignancy among men in most countries and constitutes the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Non-small cell histology represents roughly 80% of lung cancer cases comprising one third of patients with stage III, locally-advanced disease at diagnosis. Some stage IIIA cancers are considered resectable but many stage IIIA (with bulky N2) and stage IIIB (T4 any N M0, any T N3M0) cancers are considered unsuitable for surgery. However, some authors have shown that surgery after chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) is beneficial for at least progression-free survival (PFS). Since the 90s, CHRT has become the cornerstone of inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A meta-analysis of 52 randomized studies showed a survival improvement of 3% at 2 years and 2% at 5 years for patients treated with CHRT versus radiotherapy alone [6]. Concomitant chemoradiation was demonstrated to be better than sequential administration in terms of overall survival (OS) in 3 out of 4 randomized studies with esophagitis as the dose-limiting toxicity. Nevertheless, the median survival was around 16 months and improvement is needed. To better control micrometastatic disease and reduce distant relapses, one possibility is to increase radiosensitization with higher doses of chemotherapy.The aim of this phase II study is to evaluate the anti-tumoral activity of a weekly docetaxel-cisplatin combination administered concurrently with radiotherapy after 2 induction cycles with the same drugs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC,
  • stage IIIB (excluding malignant pleural or pericardial effusions, tumoral volume exceeding one radiation field,
  • N3 supraclavicular, and contralateral hilar nodal involvement) or inoperable stage IIIA defined by the new International Staging System [21],
  • 18 ≤ age ≤ 75 years,
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤2,
  • weight loss <10%,
  • at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.0 criteria,
  • adequate hematopoietic function (absolute neutrophil count ≥2 × 109/l, platelets ≥100 × 109/l, and hemoglobin level ≥10g/dl), adequate hepatic function [total serum bilirubin less than or equal to the institutional upper limit of normal (ULN), aspartate aminotransferase ≤1.5× ULN, and alkaline phosphatase ≤5× ULN], and adequate renal function (serum creatinine ≤1.5× ULN).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients previously treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy for NSCLC,
  • previous cancer except basocellular carcinoma and in situ carcinoma of the cervix curatively treated and other cancers curatively treated for at least 5 years,
  • peripheral neuropathy NCI-CTC grade ≥2,
  • noncontroled severe disease,
  • pregnant or breast-feeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Radiochemotherapy
Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatine and concomitant radiotherapy
Drug: Docetaxel
Induction chemotherapy
Radiation: concomitant radiotherapy
Pulmonary and mediastinal radiotherapy
Drug: Cisplatin
Induction chemotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the antitumor activity of Docetaxel - Cisplatin and concomitant thoracic radiotherapy after Docetaxel - Cisplatin induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-operable NSCLC by tumor response rate
Time Frame: up to 3 years

Tumor Response rate between 6 and 8 weeks according to RECIST 1.0 criteria after the end of radiotherapy (except in the case of early progression) that patients:

  • having received at least 4 weekly injections of Docetaxel and Cisplatin,
  • who have received the full radiotherapy treatment (except in case of cessation for toxicity, in which case the patients will be evaluable).
up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival and at 12 months
Time Frame: up to 3 years
To evaluate the overall survival at 12 months between the first day of treatment to the death
up to 3 years
Response delay
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Complete response delay evaluated between the day of the complete response to the progression and partial response between the first day of the treatment and the progression
up to 3 years
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: up to 3 years
To evaluate Progression free survival according to RECIST criteria
up to 3 years
Tolerance profile of the association in terms of immediate and delayed toxicity
Time Frame: up to 3 years
To evaluate early and late toxicity according to the NCI-CTC
up to 3 years
Quality of Life evaluation (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13)
Time Frame: up to 3 years
To evaluate the quality of life at inclusion, at the end oh chemotherapy, 2 months after the radiotherapy and every 3 months until end of study
up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 5, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2004/07

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings