What's Hopping? Cricket Protein and Human Gut Microbiota (HOP)

April 2, 2019 updated by: Tiffany Weir, Colorado State University

What's Hopping? Edible Cricket (Gryllodes Sigillatus) Consumption and Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial

Edible insects are often considered a nutritious, protein-rich, environmentally sustainable alternative to traditional meat. They represent a new food for North American consumers. While the nutrient composition of several insects is characterized, all potential health impacts have not been evaluated. Crickets contain chitin and other fibers that may influence gut health. In this study, we evaluated the effects of consuming 25 grams/day whole cricket powder on gut microbiota composition, while assessing safety and tolerability. Twenty healthy adults participated in this six-week, double-blind, crossover dietary intervention. Participants were randomized into two treatment arms and consumed either cricket-containing or control breakfast foods for 14 days, followed by a 14-day washout period and assignment to the opposite arm. Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and after each treatment period to assess liver function and microbiota changes. Results demonstrate that cricket consumption is tolerable and non-toxic at the treatment dose. Cricket powder supported growth of the probiotic bacteria, Bifidobacterium animalis, which increased more than 5.7-fold. Cricket consumption was also associated with reduced plasma TNF-a. These data suggest that eating crickets may improve gut health and reduce systemic inflammation; however, more research is needed to understand these effects and underlying mechanisms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Although no research on the impact of edible insect protein powder on the human microbiome, there is plenty of evidence that edible insects offer a good source nutrition. Extensive research demonstrates that edible insects provide a source of high-quality bioavailable animal protein as many edible insects contain all essential amino acids for human nutrition and have high crude protein levels containing between 40 and 75% protein by dry weight. House crickets, for example, have more protein by dry weight than ground beef or broiled cod fish. Insects are also rich in healthy fatty acids, B vitamins (riboflavin, pantothenic acid, biotin, and folate, as well as important minerals such as iron and zinc. In addition to their nutrient content, and as arthropods, edible insects are also rich in dietary fiber, including chitin, which is found in the exoskeleton.

Chitin is a modified polysaccharide containing nitrogen; it is considered an insoluble fiber with potential prebiotic properties that could benefit human health by selectively promoting the growth of beneficial bacterial species in the intestines. Previous studies on the impact of chitin-glucan derived from Aspergillus niger mycelium on oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) in adults, a risk factor for atherosclerosis, found that chitin-glucan intakes of 4.5g/day significantly reduced OxLDL in 6 weeks. Additionally, a study of chito-oligosaccharides found that chitosan derivatives from shrimp cells with a great content of acetylated residues did not cause a putatively prebiotic effect in human gut microbiota-although this study was conducted on human fecal microbiota in batch cultures (not in humans). To date, no comprehensive study has evaluated the impact of whole insect consumption on the microbiota in humans, which would include consumption of insect-derived dietary fibers and chitins with potential health benefits. An assessment of the tolerability of whole insect consumption is also needed, despite the fact that around 2 billion people consume insects on a regular basis in 130 countries or more.

The "What's Hopping? Cricket Protein and Human Gut Microbiota" study will determine the impact of a commercially available insect flour, containing high levels of protein and dietary fiber on human gut bacterial composition and functional capacity. A secondary aim is to establish whether insect powder acts as a prebiotic. In this study, a 100% insect-based flour/powder derived from edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) will be assessed. The objective of this study is to determine if Insect powder consumption changes gut bacteria and reduces inflammation in your intestinal tract compared to a placebo. To this end, we intend to enroll 20 healthy individuals to participate in a crossover diet intervention study. Participants will consume meals made with cricket powder and placebo meals daily for 2 weeks per treatment arm with a 2-week washout period. Both study participants and study personnel (clinical coordinators, PI's, statisticians) will be blinded to the intervention group. Anthropometric measures, as well as stool and blood samples, will be collected at each of 3 clinic visits (baseline, and the end of each intervention period). Primary outcome measures will include gut microbiota and microbial metabolism (determined by measuring fecal short chain fatty acids), local and systemic inflammatory markers, comprehensive metabolic panels and GI health questionnaires to assess safety and tolerability of the intervention foods.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80523-1571
        • Colorado State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Apparently healthy males and non-pregnant or lactating healthy females of any race or ethnicity and between the ages of 18-65 with a BMI between 18.5-29.9.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals younger than 18 years of age or older than 65 years, and those outside of the BMI range of 18.5-29.9 will be excluded. Individuals will also be excluded if they have taken antibiotics or commercial probiotic/prebiotic supplements within two months of the start of the study treatment. Subjects who self-report food allergies will be excluded from the study because some proteins in insect foods are similar to those found in shellfish that could trigger an allergic reaction and tree nut or dairy products may be used in the breakfast foods.

Additionally, current medications and dietary supplements will be assessed on a case by case basis and will result in exclusion if there is a possibility that the drugs or supplements used would influence the endpoints of the study. This would include statins, metformin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), and botanical supplements that target the gastrointestinal tract or gut microbiota. Individuals with current diagnosis of cancer, liver or kidney disease, gastrointestinal diseases, and metabolic disorders will also be excluded. Pregnant and breastfeeding women will be excluded from the study as well. Additionally, exclusion will be determined if the individual feels they are unable to adhere to the study requirements which include consuming 1 prepared breakfast per day (treatment or placebo) for a total of 28 days (treatment periods), making 3 clinic visits, and providing 3 blood and stool samples.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cricket powder protein
Participants were provided with frozen 70 gram breakfast muffins and pre-mixed powder packets to prepare smoothies. Participants were asked to consume one muffin package and one smoothie (mixed with water or choice of milk/milk substitutes) daily for 14 days. The amount of intervention food consumed daily contained 25 grams of cricket protein powder.
Dietary supplement: Cricket Protein Powder
Cricket powder was supplied by Entomo farms and consists of roasted and milled whole crickets.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Control
Participants were provided with a placebo comparator that included frozen 70 gram breakfast muffins and pre-mixed powder packets to prepare smoothies. Participants were asked to consume one muffin package and one smoothie (mixed with water or choice of milk/milk substitutes) daily for 14 days. These foods were formulated to taste and appear similar to the cricket intervention foods but did not consume any cricket powder.
Other: Placebo control
Placebo controls consisted of intervention foods (muffin and smoothie powder packet) that were visually and organoleptically similar to cricket-containing foods but contained no cricket powder.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in gut microbiota with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Characterization of microbes in fecal samples using 16s sequencing methodologies.
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in liver function with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Comprehensive metabolic panel
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Tolerability of intervention foods based on change in GI symptoms
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Self assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms determined by completion of a questionnaire
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Change in mucosal immunity with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
ELISA analysis of secretory Immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in stool samples
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Change in microbial metabolism with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Gas Chromatography determination of fecal short chain fatty acids
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Change in lipid metabolism with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Liquid Chromatography determination of fecal secondary and primary bile acids
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Change in systemic inflammation with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Luminex panel to examine 13 circulating cytokines (pro and anti-inflammatory)
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in lipid absorption with intervention foods
Time Frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.
Colorimetric measure of fecal triglycerides
T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Colorado State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16-6966H

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings