Angiographic and Psychosocial Evaluation of Peripartum vs. Non: SCAD (SCAD)

September 23, 2019 updated by: Katharine Sears Edwards

Angiographic and Psychosocial Evaluation of Peripartum vs. Non Peripartum Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): A Collaborative Study

This multi-site international clinical research project is a collaboration between investigators from multiple institutions in the USA, Canada, and Europe. Approximately 7 to 11 sites will participate and provide data for analysis. Clinical operations (for data collection and analysis) across sites will be managed by Stanford. The study purpose is to determine differences in clinical and imaging presentation, in-hospital management and prognosis in peripartum and non-peripartum SCAD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

There is a reason to believe that female sex hormone fluctuations during the peripartum period are linked with the occurrence of SCAD, and may be associated with a distinctive clinical presentation. In addition, symptoms of psychological distress may be linked to the development of SCAD and post-event distress is higher in SCAD patients than in those with coronary artery disease (CAD).

The primary objective is to determine differences in clinical and imaging presentation, in-hospital management and prognosis in peri-partum and non-peri-partum SCAD patients. At the methodological level, the purpose is to apply a systematic image analysis protocol for classifying SCAD lesions and to pool data to achieve adequate statistical power.

The secondary objective is to gather more information about psychological and psychosocial factors in SCAD patients. Specifically, to assess pre-event stress and psychological diagnoses and determine differences in post-event distress between peripartum and non-peripartum SCAD.

It is expected that these aims will result in two important outcomes. First, implementation of a systematic image analysis protocol for SCAD data will lead to improved reliability and, we expect, the detection of clinically meaningful differences between peripartum and non-peripartum SCAD. These differences may align with potential causal mechanisms for further study to ultimately better understand SCAD and develop treatment(s). Second, by characterizing the psychological distress experienced by SCAD patients, and differences between patients who experienced peripartum vs. non-peripartum SCAD, psychosocial risk factors may be identified and psychosocial interventions can be tailored to meet the needs of this unique patient population.

This is an observational study using cross-sectional design. There are two main components: a retrospective collection of medical history pertaining to SCAD event and prospective questionnaires. Sites may elect not to contact patients and not collect the prospective questionnaire.

Clinical variables will include demographic data, cardiac risk factors, medications and details of presentation (including peak troponin, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and days to discharge), as well as follow-up data, including recurrent events, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD.

Clinical data will be obtained by study collaborators and entered into a secure database maintained on Stanford systems. De-identified imaging data will be uploaded by collaborators. Imaging data will be analyzed by two independent readers (selected from participating institutions).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
241

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with pregnancy-related and non pregnancy-related SCAD will be recruited from the population of SCAD patients known to an international collaborative of investigators. We expect to enroll approximately 400 patients, 100 of whom have experienced peripartum SCAD. For each enrolled participant with peripartum SCAD, we will enroll 3 patients with non-peripartum SCAD who are the closest match on age at SCAD event and country.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Sites contacting patients and/or conducting the survey

  • Female adults 18 years of age and older
  • Voluntary participation
  • Patients with a known or suspected diagnosis of SCAD
  • Ability to read in English
  • Ability to access online consent and questionnaire portal

Sites not contacting patients and/or conducting the survey

  • Female adults 18 years of age and older
  • Patients with a known or suspected diagnosis of SCAD

Exclusion Criteria

- Not fulfilling inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Peripartum SCAD
Female patients who experienced any SCAD event that occurred during pregnancy or up to 1 year post-delivery
Non-peripartum SCAD
Female patients who experienced any SCAD with event onset outside of the pregnancy period

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (post-SCAD)
Time Frame: First SCAD event represents t=0. Time (in days) from t=0 until the first occurrence of any of the above, for up to 6-months after t=0.
The time from the first SCAD event until the first occurrence of (1) myocardial infarction, (2) re-vascularization, (3) stroke, or (4) death due to cardiovascular cause.
First SCAD event represents t=0. Time (in days) from t=0 until the first occurrence of any of the above, for up to 6-months after t=0.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression
Time Frame: At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) is a 9-item questionnaire that measures depression on a scale of 0-27 (where >20 is major depression).
At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Anxiety
Time Frame: At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) is a 7-item questionnaire that measures anxiety on a scale of 0-21 (where >14 is severe anxiety).
At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Stress
Time Frame: At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a 10-item questionnaire that measures stress on a scale of 0-40 (where >26 is high perceived stress).
At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Time Frame: At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.
PTSD CheckList (PCL-5) is a 20-item questionnaire that assesses the presence and severity of PTSD symptoms on a scale of 0-80 (where >32 suggests the patients needs further assessment to confirm a diagnosis of PTSD).
At survey administration (post-SCAD), ranging from 6-months to 10 years post SCAD.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Katharine Sears Edwards

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Mayo Clinic
University of British Columbia
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
University of Leicester

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Ann Tremmel, MD, MS, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Katharine S. Edwards, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 40486

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings