ZIKAlliance Children Cohort (ZIKAllianceCH) (ZIKAllianceCH)

May 17, 2022 updated by: Thomas Jaenisch, University of Heidelberg Medical Center

Children (CH) Cohort for the Evaluation of Developmental and Neurological Abnormalities in Infants Born to Mothers Residing in Areas With Zika Virus Transmission During Pregnancy

The aim of this proposal is to evaluate the causal relationship between Zika virus (ZIKV) infections in pregnancy and congenital malformations. The study will estimate the absolute and relative risks of congenital malformations and other adverse outcomes of pregnancy among women who become infected with ZIKV during pregnancy compared to uninfected pregnant women, also leading to further validation of the Congenital Zika Syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The aim of this proposal is to evaluate the causal relationship between Zika virus (ZIKV) infections in pregnancy and congenital malformations. The study will estimate the absolute and relative risks of congenital malformations and other adverse outcomes of pregnancy among women who become infected with ZIKV during pregnancy compared to uninfected pregnant women, also leading to further validation of the Congenital Zika Syndrome.

The study will also determine the ZIKV maternal to child transmission rate and evaluate co-factors or effect modifiers that account for the large variability seen in the preliminary absolute risk estimates derived from population figures and reporting of microcephaly in different states in Brazil and across Latin America.

The study will carry out a pregnant women (PW) multicentre cohort study in areas across Latin America and the Caribbean. Women will be enrolled early in pregnancy and followed every 4 weeks, in connection with their routine antenatal care visits. At each visit, urine and blood samples will be collected, tested and stored.

Among PW reporting recent or current undifferentiated fever/rash syndrome at any point in time, the acute illness episode will be characterized in greater detail. PW with suspected ZIKV infection (i.e. meeting the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) clinical case definition) during pregnancy will be managed according to national protocols. Irrespective of symptoms, pregnant women will be followed prospectively and revisited at birth (or after abortion) for a detailed documentation of the outcome of their pregnancy.

Live newborns will receive a detailed neonatal examination. In the course of examination of the newborns, biological samples will be collected and stored. Other potential causes of congenital abnormalities (TORCHS infections in the mother, toxic substances, chromosomal abnormalities), and potential effect modifiers (for example past flavivirus infections/vaccinations, socio-economic status) will also be assessed.

With appropriate counselling and consent, biological samples of newborns with severe abnormalities, deceased newborns, stillborn babies, and aborted foetuses from ZIKV-infected mothers will be collected to help elucidate the aetiological contribution of ZIKV in neurological and other congenital malformations.

Children of women infected with ZIKV during pregnancy - and a subset of the children born to uninfected women - will be followed prospectively after birth for the assessment of neuro-developmental milestones.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1554

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Bolivia
      • Guaqui, Bolivia
        • Sosecali Ltd. (SOSE)
  • Brazil
      • Recife, Brazil
        • Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • University of Sao Paulo
  • Colombia
      • Bucaramanga, Colombia
        • Industrial University of Santander (UIS)
  • Cuba
      • Havana, Cuba
        • Pedro Kouri Institute (IPK)
  • Guadeloupe
      • Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
        • INSERM
  • Mexico
      • Guadalajara, Mexico
        • IMSS Mexico (IMSS)
      • Mérida, Mexico
        • National Institute of Public Health (INSP)
  • Venezuela
      • Valencia, Venezuela
        • Universidad de Carabobo / UMC Groningen (UMCG)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

New born children

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born within the Pregnant Woman cohort
  • Born to mothers with confirmed ZIKA

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Congenital Abnormalities detected after birth as defined by the evolving definition of the congenital zika syndrome
Time Frame: Birth
Birth
Hearing abnormalities measured after birth
Time Frame: Between birth and 2 years
Between birth and 2 years
Visual abnormalities measured after birth
Time Frame: Between birth and 2 years
Between birth and 2 years
Developmental / cognitive abnormalities measured by the Ages and Stages 3rd Edition (ASQ3)
Time Frame: Between birth and 2 years
Between birth and 2 years
Developmental / cognitive abnormalities measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III)
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Heidelberg Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 734548CH (EC | H2020 | RIA)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

  1. The ZIKAlliance birth cohort is part of the 3 European Commission (EC) funded Zika consortia. The data are intended to be shared after the individual cohort data is analyzed and published.
  2. The ZIKAlliance birth cohort is part of the WHO-moderated IPD meta-analysis Consortium. The data are intended to be shared after the individual cohort data is analyzed and published.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Zika Virus

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings