Whole Body Exercise in Spinal Cord Injury: Effects on Psychosocial Function

June 19, 2020 updated by: J. Andrew Taylor, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) are confronted with a multitude of psychological and physiological changes post-injury leading to seemingly insurmountable barriers to participating in daily life. After injury persons with SCI engage in fewer social interactions, spend more time sedentary, and are less likely to leave the home. This leads to restricted social participation that, in turn, contributes to greater psychological problems and negatively impacts the lives of adults with SCI. Intense, structured exercise has substantial potential benefits for improving psychosocial wellbeing among persons with SCI, but accessible exercise options are few and cannot achieve high intensities of whole-body exercise. This work will use approaches to overcome the barriers to intense exercise. The investigators will use hybrid functional electrical stimulation row training (FESRT) to allow for a more intense exercise stimulus, potentially having a greater impact on psychosocial wellbeing. There is initial evidence that persons with mobility impairments who are highly physically active demonstrate better psychosocial wellbeing compared with those who have low levels of physical activity. A limitation to understanding the influence of exercise on psychosocial wellbeing is the lack of robust and time-dependent measures. The investigators will use a smartphone-based research application to measure psychosocial well-being, thus decreasing self-report bias and capturing in-the-moment behavioral and self-report data.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02139
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Network

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (>18 years of age)

    • Be in good health (asymptomatic for acute treatable illness) and medically cleared to exercise
    • Own an iPhone or Android smartphone with the capacity to download and run the research platform (able to log into to the relevant app store, install the app on their own phone, and run the app).
    • Be able to understand, communicate with and be understood by research personnel or Interpreters
    • Be interested in participating and provide informed consent
    • Have a SCI with motor or sensory deficits and use a wheelchair as primary means of mobility
    • Have an injury level only as high as C4 to allow sufficient arm function for rowing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will not have previously completed FESRT
  • Acute illness
  • Musculoskeletal injuries that have not healed completely
  • Had heart surgery or are status post-myocardial infarction (MI) in the last 4 to 6 months, -Unstable angina
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg)
  • uncontrolled dysrhythmias
  • Recent history of congestive heart failure that has not been evaluated and effectively treated
  • Severe stenotic or regurgitant valvular disease
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Unhealed pressure ulcer Stage 2 or higher at relevant contact sites during exercise.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: FES-row-training
Subjects will perform 4 months of FES-row-raining
Other: FES Row Training
Hybrid FES Row Training using voluntary upper body and electrically-stimulated lower body
Other: Wait-list time control
Subjects will wait 4 months before performing being allowed to engage in 4 months of FES-row-training
Other: FES Row Training
Hybrid FES Row Training using voluntary upper body and electrically-stimulated lower body
Active Comparator: Arms-only-row-training
Subjects will perform 4 months of arms-only row training before being allowed to engage in 4 months of FES-row-training
Other: FES Row Training
Hybrid FES Row Training using voluntary upper body and electrically-stimulated lower body

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in depression symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with depression
Each week during the 4 months
Pain Severity
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in pain severity, rated on a 0-10 scale ("0 being no pain and 10 being pain so severe you couldn't stand it"); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with pain.
Each week during the 4 months
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in pain interference in daily life activities ("0. Not at all 1. A little bit 2. Moderately 3. Quite a bit 4. Extremely"); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with pain.
Each week during the 4 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in anxiety (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Anxiety Short Form); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with anxiety. Minimum score is 9, Maximum score is 45. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.
Each week during the 4 months
Satisfaction with Social Participation
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in satisfaction with social roles and activities (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities Short Form); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with satisfaction with social participation. The Minimum score is 20 and the maximum score is 50. Higher values indicate greater satisfaction with social participation.
Each week during the 4 months
Ability to participate in social roles
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in ability to participate in social roles and activities. Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Short Form. Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with ability to participate in social roles. The Minimum score is 20 and the maximum score is 50. Higher values indicate greater satisfaction with social participation.
Each week during the 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health Complications
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in frequency of secondary health complications; Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with secondary health complications.
Each week during the 4 months
Community Mobility
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in community mobility (Distance traveled each week); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with community mobility.
Each week during the 4 months
Social Connectivity: Frequency
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in social connectivity (Frequency of phone calls and text messages); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with frequency of social connectivity.
Each week during the 4 months
Social Connectivity: Reciprocity
Time Frame: Each week during the 4 months
Difference between groups in social connectivity (Reciprocity of phone calls and text messages); Within-individual Correlation of exercise intensity with reciprocity of social connectivity.
Each week during the 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: J. Andrew Taylor, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 19, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017D006049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on FES Row Training

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings