Greek NIS Spiolto ELLACTO

April 15, 2020 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Changes in Health and Functional Status in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) During Therapy With Spiolto® Respimat® [ELLACTO]

Open-label observational study: including COPD patients receiving treatment with Spiolto® Respimat® for approximately 6 weeks, which is the average time between two medical consultations

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1360

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Aigina, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Athens, Greece, 18547
        • Metroplitan
      • Athens, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Chania, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Heraklio, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Hrakleio, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Hraklio, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Ioannina, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko
      • Kavala, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko
      • Larisa, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko
      • Patra, Greece, 18547
        • Metropolitan
      • Serres, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54629
        • Merkouropoulos Markos
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko
      • Volos, Greece, 55535
        • Diavalkaniko

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

1300 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom combination treatment with long-acting bronchodilators is indicated in accordance with the guidelines are to be observed by approx. 100 pulmonologists in the setting of private practice. The NIS will take place in Greece and sites in urban as well as rural areas will be included. The nationwide distribution of the participating pulmonologists as well as the number of patients enrolled are intended to ensure that the data collected are representative.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Therapeutic indication before entering the enrollment face is patients diagnosed with COPD requiring a combination therapy of two long-acting bronchodilators (LAMA + LABA) according to approved SmPC and guidelines, COPD GOLD 2017 groups B to D
  • Female and male patients ≥40 years of age
  • Treatment with Spiolto ® Respimat® acc. to SmPC and at the discretion of the physician
  • Written informed consent prior to participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindications according to Spiolto® Respimat® SmPC
  • Patients who have been treated with a LABA/LAMA combination (free and fixed dose) in the previous 6 weeks or patients already on a combination of LAMA and LABA therapy; either as a fixed combination product or as separate components Note: Patients previously treated with LABA or LAMA (with or without ICS) are eligible to be included in the study
  • Patients continuing LABA-ICS treatment should not be additionally treated with Spiolto® Respimat® in order to avoid a double dosing of long-acting beta-agonists
  • Patients for whom further follow-up is not possible at the enrolling site during the planned study period of approx. 6 weeks
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Patients currently listed for lung transplantation
  • Current participation in any clinical trial or any other non-interventional study of a drug or device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
COPD patients
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Drug: MaxSpiolto® Respimat® 160 Characters...
as per the approved SmPC
Other Names:
  • INSPIOLTO, SPIOLTO, STIOLTO, VAHELVA, YANIMO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Achieving "Therapeutic Success" Defined as a ≥ 0.4 Point of Decrease in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Score
Time Frame: Between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit after end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

Therapeutic success was defined as ≥0.4 point decrease in the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

The CCQ contained 10 questions about symptoms, functional status and mental status. Each of the 10 CCQ questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale (ranging between 0=asymptomatic/no-limitation, to 6=symptomatic/totally limited). The sum of the scores divided by 10 gives the CCQ score. A higher CCQ score is indicative of worse status. A decrease of 0.4 points is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for CCQ score.
Between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit after end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Change in Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Score Between Visit 1 and Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

Absolute change in Clinical COPD Questionaire (QQC) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

The CCQ contained 10 questions about symptoms, functional status and mental status. Each of the 10 CCQ questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale between 0 and 6. The sum of the scores divided by 10 gives the CCQ score which measured the health and functional status. A higher CCQ score is indicative of worse status.
At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
Absolute Change in the Functional Status Subdomain of Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ-4) Score Between Visit 1 and Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

Absolute change in the functional status subdomain of Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ-4) score between visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and visit 2 (final visit at end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

The CCQ-4 score is a subdomain of the CCQ-score. It contains 4 questions about the functional status of patients. Each questions was scored by the patient on a 7-point scale, (ranging between 0=asymptomatic/no-limitation, to 6=symptomatic/totally limited). The QQC-4 score was calculated by the sum of 4 questions divided by 4. A higher CCQ-4 score was indicative of worse status.
At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
General Condition of Patient at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).

General condition of the patient, evaluated by Physician´s Global Evaluation (PGE) score at visit 1 and visit 2.

The PGE score uses a eight-point ordinal scale, ranging from poor (1,2) to excellent (7,8).
At visit 1 (baseline visit at study start) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after visit 1).
Patients Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).
The patients satisfaction with Respimat was assessed at end of study (visit 2) by the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) Part 1. PASAPQ Part 1 uses a 7-point ordinal scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied, to rate the satisfaction with inhaler attributes. The patients were requested to describe their satisfaction level answering three questions.
At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).
Patients Preference for Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit)
Patients preference for Respimat® Inhaler vs. Spiriva HandiHaler (HH) was assessed using the abbreviated Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) Part 2 survey. Patients were requested to describe their preference for each inhaler device by answering 2 additional questions.
At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit)
Patient's Willingness to Continue Treatment With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Time Frame: At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).
Patients' reported willingness to continue using either of the inhalers was measured with a scale score ranking from 0 to 100. 0 indicates not willing to continue using this inhaler and 100 indicates definitely willing to continue using it.
At visit 2 (final visit, at the end of study, approximately 6 weeks after baseline visit).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 19, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 9, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 3, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 15, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1237-0073

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on MaxSpiolto® Respimat® 160 Characters...

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings